Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior最新文献

{"title":"Withdrawn","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.046","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.046","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141953519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"College Student Health-Related Quality of Life Trends Following the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.039","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.039","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) is a comprehensive assessment of one's physical, mental, social, and emotional health. It is essential to assess HRQOL, as it goes beyond isolated measures of health to capture overall well-being.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to assess changes in HRQOL in college students following the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>Independent samples of college students, ages 18-25, completed online surveys assessing demographics and HRQOL at the University of Maine at four time points: February 2019, September 2020, March 2021, and February 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>HRQOL was assessed using the CDC's Healthy Days Core Module, which asks participants to determine how many days in the past 30 days they have experienced specific health variables (eg, anxiety) and how their health status has affected their daily activities. A MANOVA was used to assess differences in HRQOL across time points.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants (N=2829) demographics were similar during the four timepoints, with average age being 19.9-20.9 years old, majority White (86.9-91.7%), and female (61.7-69.8%). There were significant differences in overall HRQOL across time points, F(21, 7509)=9.948, p&lt;0.001. On average, students felt their physical health was not good for 5.0 days in the past 30 days at the 2019 time point, which dropped to 3.4 days in 2020, then increased to 3.6 days in 2021, and 4.6 days in 2023 (p&lt;0.001). Additionally, students felt worried/tense/anxious 14.7 days in the past 30 days in 2019, which dropped to 12.9 days in 2020, and increased to 14.1 and 14.0 in 2021 and 2023, respectively (p=0.011). Other HRQOL variables followed a similar pattern.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In general, HRQOL measures improved during the height of the pandemic in 2020, and worsened in 2021 and 2023. Future research should aim to qualitatively assess why these changes were observed.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>NIFA, University of Maine Agricultural Experiment Station</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141953610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Retrospective, Exploratory Case Study of Food Insecurity During COVID-19 Pandemic Among Chinese Americans in New York City","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.058","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.058","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>COVID-19 being referred to as the “Chinese virus” and “Kung Flu” were false accusations that were repeatedly made publicly and stoked public hysteria and racist attacks. This Asian-targeted discrimination and harassment led to an even more dire situation for already economically disadvantaged Asian American who were disproportionately affected strikingly high incident rate of food insecurity during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To provide exploratory and transcriptional interpretations of the food insecurity issue during the COVID-19 pandemic among Chinese-Americans in New York City.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>A retrospective instrumental case study of a community-based food pantry participants interviewing nine Chinese American adults (18+) who speak Mandarin or English, have received emergency food assistance during COVID-19 pandemic and resided in New York City.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Oral six-item food security questionnaire, followed by open-ended in-depths interview questions which covered demographic, acculturation and food security topics. Guided by the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) and previous studies, we first used the deductive approach to define four categories (corresponds to four levels) of codes: individual, social network(interpersonal), culture and food environment. And then, inductive approach was used when the codes emerged through direct interpretation of participant responses. Lastly, all the codes were condensed to four themes with categorical aggregation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The four themes are: Lack of ability to process and cope with trauma (Individual level); Negative effect of bonding and bridging social capitals (Social Level); Unbalance between acculturation and enculturation in dietary behavior (Cultural level); and Vulnerable and inequal food system (Environmental level).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The findings can be used to inform future studies and intervention design that food pantries and governmental institutions can implement to increase accessibility and availability of food assistance resources that are culturally appropriate for the Chinese community, and build a stronger emergency food system for unexpected crises like COVID-19 pandemic or natural disasters.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>None</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141953763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Hunger Cliff and Impact on Customers at Local Markets: Evidence From Virginia Fresh Match","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.082","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.082","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Virginia Fresh Match (VFM) is a network of farmer's markets, mobile markets, and community food stores across Virginia. VFM locations offer nutrition incentives that double the value of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) dollars spent on fruits and vegetables. Federal emergency allotments for SNAP ended in March 2023 and Virginians experienced cuts to SNAP benefits (average $82/month). Little is known about the impact of benefit reductions on household food security and shopping habits of nutrition incentive program participants.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the impact of the reduction in SNAP benefits on VFM customers' food security status and shopping habits at local markets.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>Customers using SNAP-EBT and VFM were asked to complete a cross-sectional survey from the Nutrition Incentive Program Training, Technical Assistance, Evaluation, and Information Center (NTAE) with additional VFM-specific questions. Paper surveys (n=215) were collected on-site at VFM outlets and entered into Qualtrics.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>The survey included sections on demographics, program participation, shopping experience, the impact of SNAP benefit cuts, and the USDA Household Food Security Survey Module (6-item). Descriptive statistics were computed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Although 23% of VFM customers experienced no cuts, nearly half (45%) faced a reduction in their SNAP benefits of at least $100 per month. From 2022 to 2023, participants experienced a 5 percentage point increase in household food insecurity, and 60% reported low or very low food security in 2023. Customers with very low food security (49%) and low food security (51%) were more likely to report cuts of at least $100 per month compared to those with high food security (29%). Customers (76%) struggled to purchase enough food, and 74% experienced high stress due to the loss of benefits. VFM customers disclosed shopping for food less often (69%) and changing how (81%) and where (72%) they shop.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Customers with lower food security experienced steeper SNAP cuts, further jeopardizing the quality and quantity of their food, and thereby increasing their stress.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>NIFA, Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141950001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Current State and Challenges in Charitable Food Agencies in Georgia","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.068","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.068","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The charitable food system plays a pivotal role in filling the chronic food needs of low-income Americans through food and non-food programs. However, little is known about the current state and challenges charitable food agencies face in providing their programs.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the characteristics and challenges encountered by available charitable food and non-food programs at the state level.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>As part of the Georgia Hunger Study, a statewide mixed methods needs assessment, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted in a representative sample of active charitable food agency providers in Georgia in 2023 (N=935, mean age 59.9±12.4 years, 75.7% female, 54.5% African American).</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>The provider survey assessed program operations, nutrition standards and education, and SNAP application assistance. Descriptive statistics were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Georgia charitable food agencies varied widely in type, size, and operation. Most agencies provided food programs (grocery or meals) using federal, state, and local resources, and 30.9% offered non-food programs (food assistance, nutrition education). Participants reported constant challenges in securing resources (food, funding, staff/volunteers) and critical infrastructure (facility and equipment to store, manage, and distribute food) and increasing program awareness and engagement with clients and communities they serve. Although reporting the importance of distributing healthier food to their clients, participants shared various barriers at the agency and client levels. About 25% of the agencies have written policies on food programs and provided nutrition education, primarily through print education materials. Only 13.2% provided SNAP application assistance. Many agencies did not think SNAP-related services were their goal and lacked trained staff/volunteers and time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A coordinated collaboration among charitable food agencies, government agencies, and federal nutrition education programs (eg, SNAP-Ed) is needed to help low-income Georgians navigate available food assistance programs and meet their food needs.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>USDA, Georgia Department of Human Services</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141953761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Exploring the Benefits of Wild Food Plants for Nutritional Security and Rural Livelihoods in Cambodia","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The utilization of wild food plants (WFP) has been an integral part of human diets for millennia, particularly in rural and indigenous communities where access to conventional agriculture is limited. This abstract explores the benefits of WFP and their significance for sustaining rural livelihoods in Cambodia.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>WFP encompass a diverse array of species ranging from leafy greens to fruits, tubers, and roots, many of which are rich sources of essential vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients. Through a combination of surveys, nutritional analyses, and participatory assessments, the objective of this study is to shed light on the nutritional composition and potential benefits of commonly consumed WFP.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>This study employed qualitative methods to explore how households use WFP and their perceived benefits. A total of 103 people participated. Participants for this study were purposively sampled from previously identified rural villages based on if they had experience with wild food plants.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>The data were analyzed using qualitative coding techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Respondents reported that wild food plants contribute significantly to the dietary diversity and nutritional intake of rural communities, particularly during lean seasons or periods of food scarcity. These plants often contain higher levels of certain nutrients compared to cultivated crops. Furthermore, the sustainable harvest and consumption of wild food plants offer multiple advantages for rural livelihoods, including food security, income generation, and cultural preservation. However, challenges such as habitat loss, pose threats to the availability and sustainability of these resources.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In conclusion, the nutritional benefits of wild food plants are invaluable for rural livelihoods in Cambodia, providing a vital source of nourishment. By recognizing the importance of these plants and implementing measures to safeguard their diversity and availability, we can promote food security, improve nutrition outcomes, and enhance the well-being of rural communities in Cambodia.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>USAID</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141953500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Perceived Benefits and Challenges of SNAP Participation Across Urban and Rural Population","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.077","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.077","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the largest federal food assistance initiative, helps to mitigate food insecurity in low-income families. While identifying the specific factors influencing SNAP participation is crucial for ensuring equitable program reach, there is limited exploration of the disparities in participation between urban and rural populations.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify and compare the perceived benefits and challenges that influence SNAP participation across urban and rural Nebraska.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>This cross-sectional study, conducted as part of the SNAP-Ed Nebraska Needs and Assets Assessment Survey 'Healthy People, Healthy State,' focusing on low-income families with at least one child aged 6 or younger (n=1,316 [n=1032 urban; n=284 rural]).</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Descriptive statistics were calculated to determine the percentages and chi-square tests were used (SPSS v27) to examine significant differences (p &lt; .05) in perceived benefits, participation challenges, and application difficulties for SNAP across urban and rural populations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A larger proportion of survey participants highlighted the benefits of participating in SNAP over the challenges, underscoring its importance in addressing food insecurity. Among SNAP participants, financial need emerged as a key driver for enrollment, notably higher in rural (69.7%) than urban populations (47.5%, p &lt; 0.001). In the SNAP-eligible population, complex application process stood out as the most prevalent barrier to SNAP participation (25.4% rural, 23.4% urban). Urban participants expressed significantly greater concerns about relying on government assistance compared to rural (15.2% vs. 10.6%, p&lt;0.5). Regarding perceived difficulties about the application process, rural participants reported significantly greater difficulty (53.9% vs. 38.8%, p &lt; 0.001) with the SNAP application process compared to urban, while language accessibility concerns were significantly higher for urban participants (18.4% vs. 3.9%, p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>To improve SNAP participation and ensure equitable food access, the following need to be addressed: alleviate financial hardships and streamline application procedures in rural settings, overcome language barriers and stigma in urban settings, and focus on culturally and geographically targeted outreach and education.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - Education</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141953533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Making the Connection: Access and Availability of Locally Produce and Culinary Inspiration for Healthier Lifestyle Choices","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.011","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.011","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To provide an immersive experience connecting consumers to local agriculture to improve healthier meal preparation. Use of Research: Agritourism educational events have the ability to increase knowledge of locally grown produce, increase sales, change knowledge, and increase consumption of produce (Brune et., al. 2021).</p></div><div><h3>Target Audience</h3><p>Adults.</p></div><div><h3>Program Description</h3><p>A partnership between a local farm and an extension agent began in the Fall of 2021 to bring a seasonal program to the farm's market. Weekly 1-hour classes featuring seasonal produce grown on the farm or locally were developed. The sessions consisted of nutrition information, cooking inspiration, storage, knife skills, food waste, and food safety. A cooking demonstration with a featured recipe was provided with sampling. Each participant received an educational handout to support the session. The agent brought in all cooking equipment for each weekly class. All produce required for recipe testing and classes was donated by the farm. Any additional items were secured by the agent and were covered by the $3 program fee. Due to the success, the program has continued each spring and fall season since 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Evaluation Methods</h3><p>Evaluation was completed using a paper survey provided and collected at the end of each class. The survey data was entered into Qualtrics to assess and summarize the impacts.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Since inception 33 classes with 508 total participants with 88% (447) completing post program surveys. The results indicated a knowledge gain of 86% (383) how to prepare fresh produce, 68% (302) utilizing fresh herbs in a recipe, 75% (333) freezing fresh produce, 84% (376) healthy cooking methods to prepare fresh produce, 61% (274) reducing food waste when preparing fresh produce, 55% (248) health benefits of fresh produce, and 68% (305) food safety.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This unique format of education provides access to local produce, an experience to gain culinary and health related knowledge, try new foods, adopt eating practices for better health and apply principles to improve health outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>None</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141953590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Diet and Dietary Acculturation Among Immigrants From Sub-Saharan Africa Living in the United States: A Scoping Review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.017","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite Sub-Saharan African (SSA) immigrants being a highly diverse and rapidly growing U.S. immigrant group, research on their post-immigration dietary behaviors that determine future health is unclear. Dietary acculturation, the adaptations and adoptions of food habits in the U.S., warrants scholarly attention.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>A scoping review was conducted to synthesize current literature that examines post-immigration diets and the effects of dietary acculturation among SSA immigrants.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>In September 2022, three databases were searched to retrieve studies published between 2000 and 2022. From 3,388 initially retrieved articles on adult and adolescent immigrants (including refugees), 31 were included after screening.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Twenty-four articles reported dietary factors, including dietary quality, healthy diet, alcohol use, and food security; three only examined the relationship between food security and diet; and four reported on alcohol use only.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>SSA immigrants continue to eat a variety of foods and maintain low alcohol intake. Culturally important foods include traditional starches (eg, sorghum), traditional spices, goat meat, and fried fish. Buying fresh produce, eating at home, eating family meals, and skipping meals when not hungry remain essential to SSA immigrants. Dietary acculturation is reflected in changes in food purchasing, food preparation, and eating practices such as shopping in both ethnic stores and U.S. supermarkets, reading nutrition labels, preparing traditional dishes with healthier cooking methods, and increased snacking. Dietary acculturation is also expedited by child feeding and intensified by participating in food assistance programs. Meanwhile, some groups expressed pride in mastering adaptive skills in preparing U.S. foods that symbolize culture bridging. The various dimensions of dietary acculturation make it difficult to determine its impact on overall diet quality and consumption quantities using current research methods and available evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Migration from SSA to the U.S. presents the dilemma between adapting and maintaining foodways. Studies that examine detailed intake data are urgently needed. Understanding the complex dietary acculturation is fundamental to supporting immigrant health.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>None</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141953607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Why Aren't Americans Eating Enough Seafood? A Seafood Consumption Pilot Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.057","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jneb.2024.05.057","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Regular seafood consumption has important implications for human health, including reduced risk for chronic disease. The 2020-2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommend twice weekly consumption of varied seafood as a strategy to lower dietary saturated fat and sodium levels. However, almost 90% of Americans do not eat the recommended amounts of seafood. Additional education is warranted to boost seafood consumption and foster associated health and socioeconomic benefits.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to determine what educational modalities would encourage greater seafood consumption by Americans.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design, Settings, Participants</h3><p>This study examined barriers to access, cost, preparation, and consumer misconceptions about seafood. Participants who completed the 24 question pre survey were given either a $50 gift card to a local seafood market or $5 Visa card. Post-survey participants received a $5 Visa gift card.</p></div><div><h3>Measurable Outcome/Analysis</h3><p>Survey data was collected using Qualtrics to ascertain consumer attitudes about cost of seafood, health outcomes, access, sustainability, mercury perceptions, and purchasing habits.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants (n=129) completed the pre survey and (n=107) the post survey. After using the gift card for a local fish monger, 76.12% of participants indicated they were encouraged to eat more seafood. Of those who indicated they did not feel encouraged to eat more seafood, 52.38% said they already ate enough seafood. Other objections to seafood consumption included: could not afford seafood, and personal preference issues like taste, texture, and smell. Participants also indicated educational materials that would encourage greater consumption included: recipes for seafood (13.82%), coupons to purchase less expensive seafood (14.82%), and information on purchasing seasonal seafood (8.04%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This pilot study provided data to develop seafood nutrition education based on consumer preferences. It is intended to support curriculum development and assist with the expansion of supplemental information, while also acting as a potential driver for policy and systems change for increased seafood consumption and equitable access.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>John and Anne Gerwig Director's Fund Award</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141953775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}