Cooking Matters at Home Participants Improve Confidence in Food Resource Management Strategies

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jessica Soldavini PhD, MPH, RD, LDN, Marlee Caregnato MPH, RDN, LDN
{"title":"Cooking Matters at Home Participants Improve Confidence in Food Resource Management Strategies","authors":"Jessica Soldavini PhD, MPH, RD, LDN,&nbsp;Marlee Caregnato MPH, RDN, LDN","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2025.05.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate whether Cooking Matters at Home lessons delivered by college student interns through SNAP-Ed leads to changes in confidence related to food resource management strategies among participants.</div></div><div><h3>Use of Theory or Research</h3><div>Cooking Matters curricula are based on Social Cognitive Theory. Research published on in-person Cooking Matters classes have found improvements in confidence and skills related to food resource management.</div></div><div><h3>Target Audience</h3><div>Low-income individuals from North Carolina participating in online Cooking Matters at Home lessons offered through the Carolina Hunger Initiative at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill between December 2020 and June 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Program Description</h3><div>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Carolina Hunger Initiative began offering online Cooking Matters at Home lessons through SNAP-Ed. Lessons were led by undergraduate and graduate student interns over Zoom. Cooking Matters at Home focuses on helping participants learn how to purchase healthy foods on a budget that families can prepare and eat at home together. Lessons actively engaged participants using facilitated dialogue and included a live or pre-recorded recipe demonstration.</div></div><div><h3>Evaluation Methods</h3><div>Retrospective online pre/post surveys were emailed to participants at the end of each of 13 series of lessons. Seven questions from the Cooking Matters at Home survey assessed confidence related to food resource management strategies from the SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework. Confidence for each strategy was rated using a 5-point Likert scale that ranged from “Not at all Confident” to “Very Confident.” Pre and post scores were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data from 195 participants who responded to the questions on confidence for food resource management strategies were included in the analyses. Statistically significant improvements in all seven food resource management strategies were found (p&lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cooking Matters at Home lessons led by college student interns may lead to improvements in confidence related to food resource management strategies among participants.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>SNAP-Ed</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":"57 8","pages":"Pages S46-S47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499404625002179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate whether Cooking Matters at Home lessons delivered by college student interns through SNAP-Ed leads to changes in confidence related to food resource management strategies among participants.

Use of Theory or Research

Cooking Matters curricula are based on Social Cognitive Theory. Research published on in-person Cooking Matters classes have found improvements in confidence and skills related to food resource management.

Target Audience

Low-income individuals from North Carolina participating in online Cooking Matters at Home lessons offered through the Carolina Hunger Initiative at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill between December 2020 and June 2023.

Program Description

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Carolina Hunger Initiative began offering online Cooking Matters at Home lessons through SNAP-Ed. Lessons were led by undergraduate and graduate student interns over Zoom. Cooking Matters at Home focuses on helping participants learn how to purchase healthy foods on a budget that families can prepare and eat at home together. Lessons actively engaged participants using facilitated dialogue and included a live or pre-recorded recipe demonstration.

Evaluation Methods

Retrospective online pre/post surveys were emailed to participants at the end of each of 13 series of lessons. Seven questions from the Cooking Matters at Home survey assessed confidence related to food resource management strategies from the SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework. Confidence for each strategy was rated using a 5-point Likert scale that ranged from “Not at all Confident” to “Very Confident.” Pre and post scores were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

Results

Data from 195 participants who responded to the questions on confidence for food resource management strategies were included in the analyses. Statistically significant improvements in all seven food resource management strategies were found (p< 0.001).

Conclusions

Cooking Matters at Home lessons led by college student interns may lead to improvements in confidence related to food resource management strategies among participants.

Funding

SNAP-Ed
在家做饭很重要参与者提高对食物资源管理策略的信心
目的评价大学生实习生通过SNAP-Ed进行的“在家做饭”课程是否会导致参与者对食物资源管理策略的信心发生变化。使用理论或研究烹饪问题课程是基于社会认知理论。在亲自烹饪课程上发表的研究发现,与食物资源管理相关的信心和技能有所提高。目标受众2020年12月至2023年6月期间,来自北卡罗来纳州的低收入人士参加了由北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校的卡罗莱纳饥饿倡议提供的在线家庭烹饪课程。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,卡罗来纳州饥饿倡议开始通过SNAP-Ed提供在线家庭烹饪课程。课程由Zoom的本科生和研究生实习生主持。在家做饭很重要,重点是帮助参与者学习如何在预算范围内购买健康食品,让家人可以在家里一起准备和吃。课程通过促进对话积极吸引参与者,并包括现场或预先录制的食谱示范。评估方法回顾性的在线前/后调查在13个系列课程结束时通过电子邮件发送给参与者。来自家庭烹饪问题调查的七个问题评估了SNAP-Ed评估框架中与食物资源管理策略相关的信心。每个策略的信心都用李克特5分量表进行评分,范围从“完全不自信”到“非常自信”。前后得分采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行分析。结果195名参与者回答了关于食物资源管理策略信心的问题,他们的数据被纳入分析。在所有七种食物资源管理策略中都发现了统计学上显著的改进(p<;0.001)。结论由大学生实习生主持的“在家做饭”课程可以提高参与者对食物资源管理策略的信心。FundingSNAP-Ed
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信