Journal of Rural Health最新文献

{"title":"The influence of rurality on self-reported physical therapy utilization among patients with severe chronic back pain in the United States","authors":"Kevin H. McLaughlin PT, DPT","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12923","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12923","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To examine the association of rurality and physical therapy utilization among a nationally representative sample of individuals with severe chronic back pain.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study utilized a publicly available dataset from the 2019 National Health Information Survey (Adult Sample). Individuals with severe chronic back pain were identified based on survey items examining respondents’ pain frequency and location. Physical therapy utilization was identified based on survey questions asking about pain management strategies utilized over the previous 3 months. Rurality was classified as <i>large central metro</i>, <i>large fringe metro</i>, <i>medium and small metro</i>, and <i>nonmetropolitan/rural</i>, based on the county of residence. Regression was used to examine the association between rurality and physical therapy utilization, while controlling for relevant covariates. National estimates were calculated using provided weighting variables.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We identified 2925 individuals (weighted = 20,468,134) meeting the criteria for severe chronic back pain. We observed that individuals with severe chronic back pain living in nonmetropolitan/rural areas had 34% lower odds of (weighted OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.92) utilizing physical therapy compared to individuals living in large central metropolitan areas. We did not observe significant differences in the odds of utilizing physical therapy among individuals living in large fringe metropolitan areas or medium–small metropolitan areas.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Individuals living in rural parts of the United States have lower odds of using physical therapy for management of their severe chronic back pain. Additional research is needed to examine the factors that contribute to these differences and improve access to care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143015112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Correction to “Rural–urban disparities in cardiovascular disease mortality vary by poverty level and region”","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12918","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12918","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sekkarie A, Woodruff RC, Casper M, Thompson-Paul AM, Vaughan AS. Rural–urban disparities in cardiovascular disease mortality vary by poverty level and region. The Journal of Rural Health. 2025; 41 (1): e12874. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12874</p><p>The following correction has been made after publication:</p><p>The author name “Angela-Thompson Paul” has been corrected to “Angela M. Thompson-Paul”.</p><p>The online version of this article has been corrected accordingly.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.12918","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143015109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Rural nonprofit hospital community benefit and financial assistance spending: A call for greater reporting transparency","authors":"Hannah MacDougall PhD,&nbsp;Melissa Latcham MSW,&nbsp;Erica Eliason PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12914","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12914","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>US nonprofit hospitals must provide community benefits including financial assistance to be tax-exempt. Rural residents particularly benefit from financial assistance because they have higher medical debt on average. The Internal Revenue Service allows nonprofit hospitals that are members of health systems to report expenditures for their entire system (group returns) rather than for individual hospitals. Our study examined how (if at all) rural nonprofit hospitals filing group returns are different than those filing individual returns.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We used 2021 data extracted from Community Benefit Insight and the American Hospital Association for 100 rural nonprofit hospitals in Wisconsin and Minnesota. We conducted bivariate analyses examining differences in mean total community benefit spending and mean financial assistance spending as a percentage of total operating expenses for hospitals filing individual versus group returns. We conducted multivariable regression models examining the association of filing group returns and individual returns with community benefit spending and financial assistance spending.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Bivariate analysis revealed significant differences between group return hospitals and individual return hospitals in spending on community benefits (5.81% vs. 9.49%, respectively) and on financial assistance (0.36% vs. 0.71% respectively). Multivariable regression demonstrated filing group returns is significantly negatively associated with community benefit expenditures (<i>β</i> = –2.90, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and financial assistance expenditures (<i>β</i> = –0.31, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In our sample, filing group returns was associated with less spending on community benefits and financial assistance. To understand this finding, researchers need data on individual hospital spending to increase transparency and accountability.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11724223/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142967314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Determinants of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among men who have sex with men (MSM) living in rural areas of the United States: A scoping review framed by the PrEP care continuum","authors":"Andrew M. O'Neil MPH,&nbsp;Randolph D. Hubach PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Christopher Owens PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Walsh PhD,&nbsp;Katherine G. Quinn PhD,&nbsp;Steven A. John PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12916","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12916","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective intervention to prevent HIV transmission among men who have sex with men (MSM). Despite its effectiveness, PrEP uptake and adherence among MSM in the United States remain suboptimal, particularly in rural areas.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The present study presents a scoping review of the self-reported barriers and facilitators of PrEP use among MSM living in rural areas of the United States.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Design</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews—Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines informed this review. Seven online databases were searched to identify papers published from 2012 to 2023 in English with keywords related the concepts of MSM, rural, and HIV PrEP.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>From an initial 340 articles, nine were selected. Awareness significantly impacts PrEP uptake in rural areas, with challenges including limited dissemination of information through mainstream channels and low perceived HIV risk among rural MSM. However, nonmainstream information sources can enhance PrEP awareness and use. Several barriers hinder rural residents from accessing PrEP, such as a lack of competent providers, geographic isolation, cost, and stigma. High PrEP care costs, lack of financial assistance for lab work, and limited telePrEP options are key challenges in retaining individuals in PrEP care.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Suboptimal PrEP uptake in rural areas with high HIV burden remains a concern, hindered by limited information dissemination, low perceived HIV risk, geographic isolation, nonaffirming medical providers, and expensive PrEP care. Leveraging telePrEP, co-pay assistance, 340B drug pricing, and geospatial networking apps can enhance PrEP use. Multilevel interventions are crucial to combat the HIV epidemic in rural regions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142958011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sexualized drug use factors among rural sexual minority men","authors":"Christopher Owens PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Benjamin N. Montemayor PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12917","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12917","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although rural sexual minority men (SMM) use substances immediately before/during sex (i.e., sexualized drug use), the factors contributing to this behavior are unknown. We examined the factors associated with past year sexualized drug use among rural SMM.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Rural SMM in the Southern region of the United States (<i>N</i> = 345) completed an online cross-sectional survey from February to March 23, 2024. Participants answered questions about their sexualized drug use behaviors, sexual behaviors, minority stressors, and demographics. We conducted a hierarchical logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with past year sexualized drug use.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Over three-quarters of participants (79.7%) used substances immediately before/during sex in the past year. Sexualized drug use was associated with exposure to sexual minority stressors, polysubstance use, sexually transmitted infection testing, having oral sex, receiving drugs from a man in exchange for sex, and older age.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sexualized drug use is prevalent among rural SMM, and sexual minority stressors and past year sexual risk and substance misuse behaviors were contributing factors. Rural primary care clinics, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) service organizations, and outpatient and inpatient substance use organizations should implement integrative sexual and substance use screening, counseling, and referral services for their rural clients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711912/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142958012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Well-being interventions for rural health professionals: A scoping review","authors":"Skye McKennon PharmD, BCPS, ACSM-GEI,&nbsp;Suzanne Fricke DVM, MLIS,&nbsp;Dawn DeWitt MDMSc, CMedEd, MACP, FRACP, FRCP-London","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12909","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12909","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The objective of this scoping review is to identify interventions to promote well-being that have been tried or proven effective to prevent or address burnout in rural health care professionals and trainees (HCPTs). Secondarily, we aimed to identify potentially applicable and feasible well-being interventions that could help rural HCPTs.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods and analysis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We used PRISMA guidelines to conduct a scoping review of peer-reviewed English language studies, from all countries, published in core health sciences databases. We focused on intervention studies for burnout and well-being in rural HCPTs published from July 2013 to January 2024. Searches identified 571 studies; 18 additional studies were identified from hand searches of websites, reviews, and bibliographies identified in the original search strategy. Two authors screened and extracted all data using Covidence.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>After deduplication, 507 studies were screened for inclusion, and 50 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility. After discussion and consensus, 30 studies were selected for inclusion. We included selected “applicable” studies, for example, online interventions. We excluded potentially applicable studies that would not be feasible in rural settings, that is, health system interventions requiring substantial personnel and infrastructure. Interventions included individual interventions (eg, mindfulness), increased support for professionals (eg, remote pharmacist assistance), and interventions to improve quality or teamwork.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Few interventional studies have been done to support well-being and prevent burnout in vulnerable rural HCPTs. While individual interventions, such as mindfulness, are most effective to date, studies replicating or extending these interventions, and to identify supports that address workload and systems issues are needed.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11701247/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142933401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"What cancers explain the growing rural-urban gap in human papillomavirus-associated cancer incidence?","authors":"Jason Semprini PhD, MPP,&nbsp;Whitney Zahnd PhD,&nbsp;Heather M. Brandt PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12915","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12915","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Human papillomavirus (HPV) can cause cancers of the genital system, anus/rectum, and oropharynx. Prior research showed that HPV-associated cancer incidence was rising faster in nonmetro than in metro populations. Our study identified which cancers contributed to the widening disparity.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Representing ∼93% of all cancers in the United States, we analyzed data from the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (2000-2019). Restricting the analysis to HPV-associated cancers, we compared 5-year average age-adjusted incidence rates (per 100,000 population) for nonmetropolitan (Rural-Urban Continuum Codes 4-9) and metropolitan populations, by sex and cancer site. To quantify the rural-urban gap, we calculated rate ratios and absolute differences of incidence trends.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although incidence was similar in 2000-2004 (nonmetropolitan = 9.9; metropolitan = 9.9), incidence in 2015-2019 was significantly higher in nonmetropolitan (12.3) than metropolitan (11.1) populations. The gap was widest for cervical cancers (females) in 2015-2019 (1.0 case per 100,000) but grew the most since 2000-2004 in oropharyngeal cancers among males (+1.1 cases per 100,000). The nonmetropolitan rate ratios for females (RR = 1.15, 95% C.I. = 1.13, 1.17) and males (RR = 1.07, 95% C.I. = 1.05, 1.09) in 2015-2019 were higher than the respective RRs for all other years. Since 2000, the nonmetropolitan disparity has significantly grown for anal and cervical cancers in females, and oropharyngeal cancers in both sexes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Although preventable, nonmetropolitan Americans have shouldered a growing burden of HPV-associated cancers. To address these cervical, anal, and oropharyngeal cancer disparities, it is imperative that HPV vaccination programs are effectively implemented at scale.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.12915","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142933404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Social determinants of contraception use among rural adolescents: Implications for addressing disparities","authors":"Asia S. Bishop MSW, PhD,&nbsp;Paula S. Nurius MSW, PhD,&nbsp;Ashley N. Rousson MSW, PhD,&nbsp;Anindita Bhattacharya MSW, PhD,&nbsp;Ella B. Baumgarten MPH","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12901","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12901","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Few studies have examined disparities in—and social determinants of—contraception use among rural adolescents despite evidence of higher teen birth rates and greater STI risk in rural communities. Guided by a social determinants of health (SDoH) framework, this cross-sectional study aimed to address these gaps.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data come from the 2018 Healthy Youth Survey, including <i>N</i> = 3757 sexually active, rural-based adolescents. Chi-square and independent samples <i>t</i>-tests examined group differences in rates of self-reported contraception use (condoms and any form of contraception) at last sex. Logistic regression models examined associations between SDoH factors (social/community, economic, and health care access) and contraception use outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Contraception use disparities were observed for rural-based youth identifying as Black, Asian, Indigenous, and Latino/a/x/e; lesbian, gay, bisexual, and questioning their sexual identity (LGBQ); and those experiencing poverty. Regression models accounting for youth characteristics found that SDoH factors across the social/community domain—but not economic or health care access—were the strongest predictors of contraception use outcomes. In these models, LGBQ status remained negatively associated with contraception use.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Rural disparities in contraception use, particularly for marginalized youth, call for service approaches that are relevant and responsive to diverse needs. Findings also suggest that rural disparities are influenced by a complex interplay of social factors, where existing health care resources may not sufficiently mitigate youths’ adverse living conditions. Addressing contraception use disparities in rural communities will require greater uptake of comprehensive sexuality education and multilevel service approaches that attend to youths’ social contexts.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Addressing substance use disorder-related stigma in rural communities using Community Conversations","authors":"Lisham Ashrafioun PhD,&nbsp;Tedra Cobb MSEd,&nbsp;Ken Sayres MA,&nbsp;Christina Cretelle MBA","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12900","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12900","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Rural-urban divide in risk perception of LSD: Implications for psychedelic-assisted therapy","authors":"Melissa Bradley MPH,&nbsp;Daniel Grossman MA,&nbsp;Otto Simonsson PhD,&nbsp;Heith Copes PhD,&nbsp;Peter S. Hendricks PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12906","DOIUrl":"10.1111/jrh.12906","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Recent legislative initiatives in the United States have focused on the medical and legal status of psychedelics, prompting interest in understanding public perceptions of their risks. This study investigates rural-urban differences in the perception of LSD and cannabis risks using national survey data.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) between 2015 and 2021 were analyzed. Logistic regression models were used to compare risk perceptions of LSD and cannabis between rural and urban respondents, adjusting for relevant factors.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Rural residents were 1.2 to 1.4 times more likely to perceive using LSD once or twice as of great risk compared to urban residents during the survey period. However, the perception of monthly cannabis use as having great risk was slightly higher among rural residents only until 2019, with no significant differences observed in 2020 and 2021.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The study highlights a significant rural-urban divide in the perception of LSD risk, which could impact policymaking on psychedelic therapies. Understanding these differences is crucial for developing effective and equitable policies regarding psychedelic substances and treatments.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142899911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}