Examination of rural–urban disparities in utilization of preventive dental procedures in the US pediatric population: A cross-sectional study

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Affan Ghaffari PhD, Katelyn Y. Graves PhD, Russell F. Bradbury MS, Jeffrey S. Harman PhD
{"title":"Examination of rural–urban disparities in utilization of preventive dental procedures in the US pediatric population: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Affan Ghaffari PhD,&nbsp;Katelyn Y. Graves PhD,&nbsp;Russell F. Bradbury MS,&nbsp;Jeffrey S. Harman PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the extent to which there were disparities in access to recommended preventive oral services between US-based children living in rural versus urban areas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study used cross-sectional, parent-reported National Survey of Children's Health data from 2022, which is the most current year of publicly available data when analyses were performed. Inclusion criteria included all children from the ages of 2 through 17. The US Census Bureau definition of rural was used to guide the analyses. Survey procedures within Stata were used to build the multiple regression models. To test the association between the main predictor variable (i.e., rural–urban designation) and outcome variable (i.e., percentage of those receiving five recommended preventive dental services), five sets of multiple logistic regressions were used, which controlled for the effects of all the other covariates. The STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was used for reporting purposes in this manuscript.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Controlling for the effects of covariates, there was no association of living in an urban area (as opposed to a rural area) and children receiving any of the five recommended services, including comprehensive oral examination, prophylaxis, sealants, radiographs, and fluoride treatments (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study demonstrated the lack of disparities in utilization of preventive dental procedures among US-based children, which may be attributable to factors such as innovative service delivery models integrating telehealth and community-based management in rural communities, COVID-19, and public insurance expansion. Future studies should be conducted to track whether the trend of eroding disparities remains consistent.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the extent to which there were disparities in access to recommended preventive oral services between US-based children living in rural versus urban areas.

Methods

The study used cross-sectional, parent-reported National Survey of Children's Health data from 2022, which is the most current year of publicly available data when analyses were performed. Inclusion criteria included all children from the ages of 2 through 17. The US Census Bureau definition of rural was used to guide the analyses. Survey procedures within Stata were used to build the multiple regression models. To test the association between the main predictor variable (i.e., rural–urban designation) and outcome variable (i.e., percentage of those receiving five recommended preventive dental services), five sets of multiple logistic regressions were used, which controlled for the effects of all the other covariates. The STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was used for reporting purposes in this manuscript.

Findings

Controlling for the effects of covariates, there was no association of living in an urban area (as opposed to a rural area) and children receiving any of the five recommended services, including comprehensive oral examination, prophylaxis, sealants, radiographs, and fluoride treatments (p > 0.01).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated the lack of disparities in utilization of preventive dental procedures among US-based children, which may be attributable to factors such as innovative service delivery models integrating telehealth and community-based management in rural communities, COVID-19, and public insurance expansion. Future studies should be conducted to track whether the trend of eroding disparities remains consistent.

美国儿童预防牙科手术的城乡差异检查:一项横断面研究
目的确定生活在美国农村和城市地区的儿童在获得推荐的预防性口腔服务方面的差异程度。该研究使用了横断面、家长报告的2022年全国儿童健康调查数据,这是进行分析时公开可用数据的最新年份。纳入标准包括2至17岁的所有儿童。美国人口普查局对农村的定义被用来指导分析。采用Stata内部的调查程序建立多元回归模型。为了检验主要预测变量(即农村-城市指定)和结果变量(即接受五种推荐的预防性牙科服务的百分比)之间的关联,使用了五组多元逻辑回归,控制了所有其他协变量的影响。横断面研究的STROBE检查表在本文中用于报告目的。在控制协变量的影响后,居住在城市地区(相对于农村地区)和儿童接受五种推荐服务中的任何一种都没有关联,包括全面口腔检查、预防、密封剂、x光片和氟化物治疗(p >;0.01)。我们的研究表明,美国儿童在使用预防性牙科手术方面缺乏差异,这可能归因于农村社区远程医疗和社区管理相结合的创新服务提供模式、COVID-19和公共保险扩张等因素。今后的研究应追踪差距缩小的趋势是否保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信