Affan Ghaffari PhD, Katelyn Y. Graves PhD, Russell F. Bradbury MS, Jeffrey S. Harman PhD
{"title":"美国儿童预防牙科手术的城乡差异检查:一项横断面研究","authors":"Affan Ghaffari PhD, Katelyn Y. Graves PhD, Russell F. Bradbury MS, Jeffrey S. Harman PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the extent to which there were disparities in access to recommended preventive oral services between US-based children living in rural versus urban areas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study used cross-sectional, parent-reported National Survey of Children's Health data from 2022, which is the most current year of publicly available data when analyses were performed. Inclusion criteria included all children from the ages of 2 through 17. The US Census Bureau definition of rural was used to guide the analyses. Survey procedures within Stata were used to build the multiple regression models. To test the association between the main predictor variable (i.e., rural–urban designation) and outcome variable (i.e., percentage of those receiving five recommended preventive dental services), five sets of multiple logistic regressions were used, which controlled for the effects of all the other covariates. The STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was used for reporting purposes in this manuscript.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Controlling for the effects of covariates, there was no association of living in an urban area (as opposed to a rural area) and children receiving any of the five recommended services, including comprehensive oral examination, prophylaxis, sealants, radiographs, and fluoride treatments (<i>p</i> > 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study demonstrated the lack of disparities in utilization of preventive dental procedures among US-based children, which may be attributable to factors such as innovative service delivery models integrating telehealth and community-based management in rural communities, COVID-19, and public insurance expansion. Future studies should be conducted to track whether the trend of eroding disparities remains consistent.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examination of rural–urban disparities in utilization of preventive dental procedures in the US pediatric population: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Affan Ghaffari PhD, Katelyn Y. Graves PhD, Russell F. Bradbury MS, Jeffrey S. Harman PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.70022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To determine the extent to which there were disparities in access to recommended preventive oral services between US-based children living in rural versus urban areas.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study used cross-sectional, parent-reported National Survey of Children's Health data from 2022, which is the most current year of publicly available data when analyses were performed. Inclusion criteria included all children from the ages of 2 through 17. The US Census Bureau definition of rural was used to guide the analyses. Survey procedures within Stata were used to build the multiple regression models. To test the association between the main predictor variable (i.e., rural–urban designation) and outcome variable (i.e., percentage of those receiving five recommended preventive dental services), five sets of multiple logistic regressions were used, which controlled for the effects of all the other covariates. The STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was used for reporting purposes in this manuscript.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Controlling for the effects of covariates, there was no association of living in an urban area (as opposed to a rural area) and children receiving any of the five recommended services, including comprehensive oral examination, prophylaxis, sealants, radiographs, and fluoride treatments (<i>p</i> > 0.01).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study demonstrated the lack of disparities in utilization of preventive dental procedures among US-based children, which may be attributable to factors such as innovative service delivery models integrating telehealth and community-based management in rural communities, COVID-19, and public insurance expansion. Future studies should be conducted to track whether the trend of eroding disparities remains consistent.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70022\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examination of rural–urban disparities in utilization of preventive dental procedures in the US pediatric population: A cross-sectional study
Purpose
To determine the extent to which there were disparities in access to recommended preventive oral services between US-based children living in rural versus urban areas.
Methods
The study used cross-sectional, parent-reported National Survey of Children's Health data from 2022, which is the most current year of publicly available data when analyses were performed. Inclusion criteria included all children from the ages of 2 through 17. The US Census Bureau definition of rural was used to guide the analyses. Survey procedures within Stata were used to build the multiple regression models. To test the association between the main predictor variable (i.e., rural–urban designation) and outcome variable (i.e., percentage of those receiving five recommended preventive dental services), five sets of multiple logistic regressions were used, which controlled for the effects of all the other covariates. The STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was used for reporting purposes in this manuscript.
Findings
Controlling for the effects of covariates, there was no association of living in an urban area (as opposed to a rural area) and children receiving any of the five recommended services, including comprehensive oral examination, prophylaxis, sealants, radiographs, and fluoride treatments (p > 0.01).
Conclusions
Our study demonstrated the lack of disparities in utilization of preventive dental procedures among US-based children, which may be attributable to factors such as innovative service delivery models integrating telehealth and community-based management in rural communities, COVID-19, and public insurance expansion. Future studies should be conducted to track whether the trend of eroding disparities remains consistent.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.