IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Emma Kathryn Boswell MPH, Olivia M. Hinds MPH, Cassie Odahowski PhD, Elizabeth Crouch PhD, Peiyin Hung PhD, Christina M. Andrews PhD
{"title":"Rural–urban differences in substance use during pregnancy","authors":"Emma Kathryn Boswell MPH,&nbsp;Olivia M. Hinds MPH,&nbsp;Cassie Odahowski PhD,&nbsp;Elizabeth Crouch PhD,&nbsp;Peiyin Hung PhD,&nbsp;Christina M. Andrews PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Drug overdoses are now a leading cause of pregnancy-related deaths in the United States. Despite evidence of rural–urban disparities in substance use, there has not yet been a nationally representative examination of rural–urban differences in perinatal substance use. This study provides a comprehensive examination of rural–urban disparities in perinatal substance use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study uses cross-sectional data to examine 3499 pregnant women from the 2015–2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Rural (nonmetro)–urban (metro) differences in past-month tobacco use, alcohol use, binge drinking, illicit drug use, and marijuana use were examined using Rao–Scott chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression using complex survey weights.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>In 2015–2019, past-month tobacco use varied geographically, as rural pregnant participants were more likely to have used tobacco than those in small and large urban areas (24.7% vs. 15.2% and 8.2%, respectively, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). After controlling for sociodemographic and health care needs, rural pregnant women were more likely to report tobacco use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.66, 3.25) but were less likely to report alcohol use (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.98) than their large urban counterparts. There were no rural–urban differences in the odds of binge drinking, illicit drug use, or marijuana-only use in the past month.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Geographic variations in perinatal substance use highlight the need for tailored interventions targeting substance use prevention during pregnancy, prioritizing tobacco in rural areas and alcohol in urban areas.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 吸毒过量现已成为美国妊娠相关死亡的主要原因。尽管有证据表明农村和城市在药物使用方面存在差异,但尚未对农村和城市在围产期药物使用方面的差异进行具有全国代表性的调查。本研究对围产期药物使用方面的城乡差异进行了全面调查。 方法 本研究使用横断面数据,研究了 2015-2019 年全国药物使用和健康调查(NSDUH)中的 3499 名孕妇。使用拉奥-斯科特卡方检验和使用复杂调查权重的多变量逻辑回归检验了农村(非城市)-城市(城市)在上月烟草使用、酒精使用、酗酒、非法药物使用和大麻使用方面的差异。 研究结果 2015-2019年,上月烟草使用情况因地域而异,农村怀孕参与者比小城镇和大城市参与者更有可能使用烟草(分别为24.7%对15.2%和8.2%,p <0.0001)。在对社会人口学和医疗保健需求进行控制后,与大城市的孕妇相比,农村孕妇更有可能报告吸烟(调整后的几率比 [aOR]:2.32,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.66, 3.25),但报告饮酒(aOR:0.58,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.34, 0.98)的几率较低。在过去一个月中,酗酒、使用非法药物或仅使用大麻的几率没有城乡差异。 结论 围产期药物使用的地域差异凸显了针对孕期药物使用预防采取有针对性干预措施的必要性,农村地区应优先考虑烟草,城市地区应优先考虑酒精。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rural–urban differences in substance use during pregnancy

Purpose

Drug overdoses are now a leading cause of pregnancy-related deaths in the United States. Despite evidence of rural–urban disparities in substance use, there has not yet been a nationally representative examination of rural–urban differences in perinatal substance use. This study provides a comprehensive examination of rural–urban disparities in perinatal substance use.

Methods

This study uses cross-sectional data to examine 3499 pregnant women from the 2015–2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Rural (nonmetro)–urban (metro) differences in past-month tobacco use, alcohol use, binge drinking, illicit drug use, and marijuana use were examined using Rao–Scott chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression using complex survey weights.

Findings

In 2015–2019, past-month tobacco use varied geographically, as rural pregnant participants were more likely to have used tobacco than those in small and large urban areas (24.7% vs. 15.2% and 8.2%, respectively, p < 0.0001). After controlling for sociodemographic and health care needs, rural pregnant women were more likely to report tobacco use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.66, 3.25) but were less likely to report alcohol use (aOR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.98) than their large urban counterparts. There were no rural–urban differences in the odds of binge drinking, illicit drug use, or marijuana-only use in the past month.

Conclusions

Geographic variations in perinatal substance use highlight the need for tailored interventions targeting substance use prevention during pregnancy, prioritizing tobacco in rural areas and alcohol in urban areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信