关键医院:来自边境社区卫生一体化项目的经验教训

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Melissa A. Romaire PhD, Alison Banger MS, Regina Rutledge PhD, Saira Haque PhD
{"title":"关键医院:来自边境社区卫生一体化项目的经验教训","authors":"Melissa A. Romaire PhD,&nbsp;Alison Banger MS,&nbsp;Regina Rutledge PhD,&nbsp;Saira Haque PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>In 2016, the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services implemented the Frontier Community Health Integration Project (FCHIP) to test the impact of a Medicare payment change for telehealth and ambulance services and a policy change for skilled nursing facility (SNF) beds for critical access hospitals (CAHs) treating Medicare fee-for-service patients in frontier regions. We evaluated the impact of FCHIP on ambulance, SNF, and telehealth service delivery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a primarily qualitative evaluation, with some descriptive analyses, of 10 CAHs in Montana, Nevada, and North Dakota that participated in FCHIP. Key informant interviews and program documents were thematically analyzed to understand how CAHs implemented their interventions. Analyses of Medicare fee-for-service ambulance, SNF, and telehealth claims from August 2013 through July 2019 described service use over time at participating CAHs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>CAHs used the demonstration to develop their workforce, even when staff turnover was a primary concern, and the demonstration gave CAHs a reason to change care delivery and improve partnerships with other hospitals or specialists treating their patients. Technical assistance supported CAHs in transforming care. CAH staff reported that FCHIP payment and policy changes had little impact on hospital finances. Changes in service use over time varied by FCHIP service.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Despite notable challenges like staffing shortages, CAHs remain committed to meeting community need by making improvements in care delivery. With low population volume and thus minimal demand for certain services, expectations that volume-based payment policies can financially bolster CAHs may need to be tempered.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical access hospitals: Lessons from the Frontier Community Health Integration Project\",\"authors\":\"Melissa A. Romaire PhD,&nbsp;Alison Banger MS,&nbsp;Regina Rutledge PhD,&nbsp;Saira Haque PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.70024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>In 2016, the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services implemented the Frontier Community Health Integration Project (FCHIP) to test the impact of a Medicare payment change for telehealth and ambulance services and a policy change for skilled nursing facility (SNF) beds for critical access hospitals (CAHs) treating Medicare fee-for-service patients in frontier regions. We evaluated the impact of FCHIP on ambulance, SNF, and telehealth service delivery.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a primarily qualitative evaluation, with some descriptive analyses, of 10 CAHs in Montana, Nevada, and North Dakota that participated in FCHIP. Key informant interviews and program documents were thematically analyzed to understand how CAHs implemented their interventions. Analyses of Medicare fee-for-service ambulance, SNF, and telehealth claims from August 2013 through July 2019 described service use over time at participating CAHs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>CAHs used the demonstration to develop their workforce, even when staff turnover was a primary concern, and the demonstration gave CAHs a reason to change care delivery and improve partnerships with other hospitals or specialists treating their patients. Technical assistance supported CAHs in transforming care. CAH staff reported that FCHIP payment and policy changes had little impact on hospital finances. Changes in service use over time varied by FCHIP service.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Despite notable challenges like staffing shortages, CAHs remain committed to meeting community need by making improvements in care delivery. With low population volume and thus minimal demand for certain services, expectations that volume-based payment policies can financially bolster CAHs may need to be tempered.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2016年,医疗保险中心医疗补助服务实施了边境社区卫生一体化项目(FCHIP),以测试医疗保险支付方式对远程医疗和救护车服务的改变,以及对边境地区治疗医疗保险按服务收费患者的关键通道医院(CAHs)的熟练护理设施(SNF)床位政策变化的影响。我们评估了FCHIP对救护车、SNF和远程医疗服务提供的影响。方法我们对蒙大拿州、内华达州和北达科他州参加FCHIP的10家CAHs进行了主要的定性评估,并进行了一些描述性分析。对关键信息提供者访谈和项目文件进行主题分析,以了解CAHs如何实施其干预措施。对2013年8月至2019年7月期间医疗保险按服务收费救护车、SNF和远程医疗索赔的分析描述了参与cah的服务随时间的使用情况。即使在员工流失是主要问题的情况下,CAHs也利用该示范来发展其员工队伍,并且该示范使CAHs有理由改变护理服务并改善与其他医院或为其患者治疗的专家的合作关系。技术援助支持CAHs转变护理方式。CAH工作人员报告说,FCHIP支付和政策变化对医院财务影响不大。服务使用随时间的变化随FCHIP服务而变化。结论:尽管面临着人员短缺等显著挑战,CAHs仍然致力于通过改善护理服务来满足社区需求。由于人口数量较少,因此对某些服务的需求最小,因此可能需要降低基于数量的支付政策可以在财务上支持CAHs的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical access hospitals: Lessons from the Frontier Community Health Integration Project

Purpose

In 2016, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services implemented the Frontier Community Health Integration Project (FCHIP) to test the impact of a Medicare payment change for telehealth and ambulance services and a policy change for skilled nursing facility (SNF) beds for critical access hospitals (CAHs) treating Medicare fee-for-service patients in frontier regions. We evaluated the impact of FCHIP on ambulance, SNF, and telehealth service delivery.

Methods

We conducted a primarily qualitative evaluation, with some descriptive analyses, of 10 CAHs in Montana, Nevada, and North Dakota that participated in FCHIP. Key informant interviews and program documents were thematically analyzed to understand how CAHs implemented their interventions. Analyses of Medicare fee-for-service ambulance, SNF, and telehealth claims from August 2013 through July 2019 described service use over time at participating CAHs.

Findings

CAHs used the demonstration to develop their workforce, even when staff turnover was a primary concern, and the demonstration gave CAHs a reason to change care delivery and improve partnerships with other hospitals or specialists treating their patients. Technical assistance supported CAHs in transforming care. CAH staff reported that FCHIP payment and policy changes had little impact on hospital finances. Changes in service use over time varied by FCHIP service.

Conclusion

Despite notable challenges like staffing shortages, CAHs remain committed to meeting community need by making improvements in care delivery. With low population volume and thus minimal demand for certain services, expectations that volume-based payment policies can financially bolster CAHs may need to be tempered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信