Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine最新文献

{"title":"Benefits and barriers to return to education and relationship to quality of life for people living with spinal cord injury: Results of a mixed methods study.","authors":"Shelly Hsieh, Adria De Simone, Trevor Dyson-Hudson, John O'Neill, Amanda Botticello, Ada Chen, Steven Kirshblum","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2294520","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2294520","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>There is limited research on return to education (RTE) after spinal cord injury (SCI). As a result, few programs exist to help people achieve this goal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective was to investigate the barriers and facilitators to RTE, and the relationship between RTE and quality of life (QOL). The secondary objective was to examine the role of a Vocational Resource Facilitation (VRF) program on RTE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods approach with a semi-structured interview and online survey was used. Participants included 15 people with SCI with RTE goals who received VRF services at an acute inpatient rehabilitation hospital. Qualitative responses on the barriers, facilitators and perceived benefits of RTE were analyzed using a grounded theory strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers to RTE included physical and mental health, transportation, time, environmental barriers, finances, lack of knowledge about available resources, and discrimination. Facilitators to RTE included the VRF program, social support, financial support, virtual learning, organizational support, and policy constructs. People who RTE after SCI reported better QOL, less depressed mood than those who did not, and were more likely to have returned to work.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlighted common barriers and facilitators to RTE, and potential areas of intervention. VRF is a potentially efficacious early intervention vocational rehabilitation approach that improves participation in education and employment for people with SCI. People who received VRF and achieved RTE may have better QOL outcomes and improved employability.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"327-337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864026/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139492527","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Dose escalation in intrathecal baclofen therapy based on disease etiology: Can an <i>a priori</i> target dose be established? A ten-year follow-up study.","authors":"Muhammet Enes Gündüz, Finn Haak, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle, Georgios Matis","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2266614","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2266614","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy is administered for severe, persistent spasticity that cannot be addressed by oral medication or other treatments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the target dose of ITB for severe, persistent spasticity based on disease etiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data at baseline (discharge), 1, and 10 years from 102 patients who received ITB therapy between 1985 and 2011 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided based on disease etiology (cerebral, spinal, or multiple sclerosis [MS]) to evaluate differences in dose requirements. A comprehensive literature review of the dose trends in ITB therapy was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with cerebral spasticity (<i>n</i> = 62) required the highest dose after discharge (102.66 ± 30.9 µg), 1 (402.29 ± 300.2 µg), and 10 years (578.74 ± 421.2 µg). Patients with spinal spasticity (<i>n</i> = 19) required an average of 82.89 ± 30.7 µg baclofen at discharge, 296.3 ± 224.6 µg after 1 year, and 522.63 ± 425.97 µg after 10 years. Patients with MS-related spasticity (<i>n</i> = 21) had a dose of 82.73 ± 39.3 µg baclofen at discharge, 226.95 ± 193.3 µg after 1 year, and 320.6 ± 261.4 µg after 10 years. The differences among the categories were significant after 1 and 10 years of therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The largest dose escalation occurs within the first year of ITB therapy. Our work provides a guideline for the initial dose setting during the inpatient stay after implantation and potentially expected dosage over the years thereafter, although this must always be adjusted individually.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"283-289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864033/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138048370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Severe traumatic dislocation of the lower cervical spine with mild neurological symptoms: Case reports and literature review.","authors":"Qian Yang, Ze-Chuan Yang, Chao-Xu Liu, Heng Zeng","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2374131","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2374131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Severe traumatic fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine are usually accompanied by irreversible spinal cord injuries. Such patients rarely have mild or no neurological symptoms.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We report three cases of severe lower cervical dislocation without spinal cord injury and discuss the mechanisms underlying this type of injury. All three patients had severe lower cervical dislocation, but their neurological symptoms were mild. In all cases, the fractures occurred at the bilateral junctions of the lamina and pedicle, resulting in severe cervical spondylolisthesis, whereas the posterior structure remained in place, thereby increasing the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal. After preoperative skull traction for a few days, the patients underwent anterior or combined anterior and posterior cervical surgeries. All surgeries were successfully completed and the patient's symptoms disappeared at the last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Severe traumatic dislocation of the lower cervical spine with an intact neurological status is rare in clinical practice. Pathological canal enlargement preserves neurological function, and the most commonly injured segment is C7. Preoperative traction for closed reduction remains controversial. We suggest that if no obvious anterior compression is observed, closed reduction should be pursued. Anterior or combined anterior and posterior cervical surgeries can provide rigid fixation with satisfactory results.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"357-363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864024/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141602054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Motor priming to enhance the effect of physical therapy in people with spinal cord injury.","authors":"Radha Kumari, Aleksandra Dybus, Mariel Purcell, Aleksandra Vučković","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2317011","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2317011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is an emerging neurorehabilitation therapy for people with spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aimed to test whether priming the sensorimotor system using BCI-controlled functional electrical stimulation (FES) before physical practice is more beneficial than physical practice alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten people with subacute SCI participated in a randomized control trial where the experimental (<i>N</i> = 5) group underwent BCI-FES priming (∼15 min) before physical practice (30 min), while the control (<i>N</i> = 5) group performed physical practice (40 min) of the dominant hand. The primary outcome measures were BCI accuracy, adherence, and perceived workload. The secondary outcome measures were manual muscle test, grip strength, the range of motion, and Electroencephalography (EEG) measured brain activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average BCI accuracy was 85%. The experimental group found BCI-FES priming mentally demanding but not frustrating. Two participants in the experimental group did not complete all sessions due to early discharge. There were no significant differences in physical outcomes between the groups. The ratio between eyes closed to eyes opened EEG activity increased more in the experimental group (theta P_θ= 0.008, low beta P_lβ= 0.009, and high beta P_hβ= 1.48e-04) indicating better neurological outcomes. There were no measurable immediate effects of BCI-FES priming.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Priming the brain before physical therapy is feasible but may require more than 15 min. This warrants further investigation with an increased sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"312-326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864022/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139933863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Epidemiology of spinal cord injury and spinal cord injury-induced urinary tract stones in Taiwan: A 2005-2015 population-based cohort study.","authors":"Mei-Hua Cheng, Shu-O Chiang, Chen-Yi Wang, Kuo-Ting Chang, Wei-Jie Wang","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2293326","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2293326","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) can develop urinary tract stones (UTSs) up to years after the injury, which is especially common in the first few months. However, relevant epidemiological studies and up-to-date epidemiological data for SCI in Taiwan are lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To estimate SCI and SCI-induced UTS incidence and trauma severity, neurological deficits, and injury site in patients with SCI-induced UTSs in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.Patient sample: Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) data and death data from the Department of Health and Welfare Data Science Center (HWDC) collected over 2005-2015 from 13,977 patients with SCI aged >18 years.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Cumulative incidence (CI), incidence density (ID), relative ratios (RRs), odds ratios (ORs), and hazard ratios (HRs) were measured.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By using Cox regression, we assessed UTS risk in patients with SCI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although standardized SCI incidence demonstrated a decreasing trend annually, the average annual incidence remained at 60.4 per million. Most (65.7%) of the included patients were men. SCI incidence was 1.98 times higher in men than in women. The most common injury site was the cervical spine (63.8%); the incidence at this site was 2.83 times higher in men than in women. Most (76.1%) of the patients had traumatic SCI (TSCI), and the standardized incidence of TSCI and non-TSCI was 45.9 and 14.4 per million, respectively. 46.1% of the patients had severe SCI (RISS ≥ 16). Over the 11-year follow-up period, UTSs occurred in 10.4% of the patients, with a standardized incidence of 2.39 per 100 person-years, and UTS risk was 1.56 times higher in men than in women. Age of 45-65 years, SCIs at multiple sites, and neurological deficits (e.g. paraplegia) were noted to be UTS risk factors. Finally, UTS onset mainly occurred in the first year after SCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of UTS among patients with SCI is influenced by age, sex, injury site, and paraplegia but not by paralysis resulting from other neurological deficits. Even though SCI incidence is declining annually, severe SCI remains a significant issue. Therefore, continuing to reduce SCI incidence and strengthening urinary tract management in patients with SCI are essential for reducing UTS occurrence and their impact on health.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"248-258"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864027/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139492531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparing surgeries to restore upper extremity function in tetraplegia: Impact on function during the perioperative period.","authors":"Caitlin A Francoisse, Blair R Peters, Catherine M Curtin, Christine B Novak, Stephanie A Russo, Katharine Tam, Doug T Ota, Katherine C Stenson, John D Steeves, Carie R Kennedy, Ida K Fox","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2283238","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2283238","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context/objective: </strong>To assess short-term changes in health outcomes in people with cervical-level spinal cord injury (SCI) who underwent upper extremity (UE) reconstruction via either novel nerve transfer (NT) or traditional tendon transfer (TT) surgery with individuals who did not undergo UE surgical reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, comparative cohort pilot study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>34 participants with cervical SCI met the following inclusion criteria: age 18 or older, greater than 6 months post-injury, and mid-cervical level SCI American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A, B or C.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two tertiary academic hospitals and their affiliated veterans' hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Health outcomes were assessed using two previously validated measures, the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Demographic, surgical, and survey data were collected at the initial evaluation and one month postoperatively/post-baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>34 participants with cervical SCI were recruited across three cohorts: no surgery (<i>n</i> = 16), NT (<i>n</i> = 10), and TT (<i>n</i> = 8). The TT group had a decline in SCIM and SF-36 scores whereas the NT and no surgery groups experienced little change in independence or health status in the immediate perioperative period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgeons and rehabilitation providers must recognize differences in the perioperative needs of people with cervical SCI who chose to have restorative UE surgery. Future work should focus on further investigation of health outcomes, change in function, and improving preoperative counseling and cross-disciplinary management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"300-311"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864012/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139484673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Advancing open science: The evolving role of preprints in biomedical research.","authors":"Carol Ann Murphy, Florian P Thomas","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2466373","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2466373","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":"48 2","pages":"159-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864035/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143494555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Feasibility of a community-based structured exercise program for persons with spinal cord injury.","authors":"Kerri A Morgan, Kelly L Taylor, Rachel Heeb Desai, Kimberly Walker, Susan Tucker, Carla Wilson Walker, Holly Hollingswoth, W Todd Cade","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2293327","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2293327","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) Examine the feasibility of a community-based exercise intervention for persons with spinal cord injury and (2) compare the cardiorespiratory fitness, skeletal muscle strength, and psychosocial well-being of participants in the intervention group versus control group.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Community-based pilot randomized controlled trial. <i>Setting</i>: Accessible community-based health and wellness center. <i>Participants</i>: Thirty-two sedentary community-dwelling adults with any level of spinal cord injury. <i>Interventions:</i> Participants were randomized to a 36-session/12-week community-based exercise program (intervention; EG) or to a 36-session/12-week physical activity education group (control; CG). <i>Outcome measures</i>: Primary outcome measures included cardiorespiratory fitness measured by a VO₂peak test, a composite score of four upper extremity musculoskeletal strength 1-repetition maximum exercises, and feasibility measured by EG participants' adherence and exercise intensity achieved during the program. EG participants' acceptance of the program was also evaluated using a self-reported satisfaction scale. Self-efficacy, motivation, pain, and goal performance and satisfaction were secondary outcome measures. Adherence and acceptability were also measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen participants (<i>n</i> = 15) completed the community-based exercise intervention and seventeen (<i>n</i> = 17) completed the education program. While no statistically significant differences were found, the EG experienced changes of moderate effect size in cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, motivation, and satisfaction with their goals. The EG attended, on average, two sessions per week. The community-based exercise intervention was highly accepted by and satisfying for participants to engage in.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EG had improvements in the two primary measures, cardiorespiratory fitness and musculoskeletal strength, following the intervention. The community-based exercise intervention was feasible and accepted by participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"338-350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864005/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139492533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Use and experienced effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments for chronic spinal cord injury related pain in The Netherlands: A cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Tim C Crul, Aline J Hakbijl-van der Wind, Charlotte M van Laake-Geelen, Johanna Ma Visser-Meily, Marcel Wm Post, Janneke M Stolwijk-Swüste","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2345448","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2345448","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context/objective: </strong>Chronic pain is a common secondary condition in spinal cord injury (SCI). Pharmacological interventions to reduce pain are associated with side effects. The reported effects of non-pharmacological treatments are unclear. This study aims to examine the self-reported presence and type of pain, and the use, effectiveness and side effects of non-pharmacological treatments for pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey regarding SCI-related pain and non-pharmacological treatments.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community, the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Outpatients with SCI from two rehabilitation centers.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Self-reported presence and type of pain, use, effectiveness and side effects of non-pharmacological treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 371 patients (41.5%) returned the questionnaire. Median time since onset of SCI was 7 years. Pain following SCI was reported by 262 patients (70.6%). Neuropathic pain was reported most often (74.4%), followed by musculoskeletal pain (51.5%). Of patients with pain, 204 (77.9%) reported past or current use of non-pharmacological treatments. Non-pharmacological treatments used most were physiotherapy (67.6%), physical exercise (44.7%) and massage (22.5%). Of patients using non-pharmacological treatments, 152 patients (74.5%) reported the effect of their treatment. Most treatments for which the effect was reported, were described as moderately effective. Most side effects were reported for cannabis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with SCI experiencing pain often use non-pharmacological treatments. Most treatments were described as moderately effective. Research on specific non-pharmacological treatments and different types of pain separately is needed to further determine the effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"199-207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864019/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140870990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Embracing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Access (IDEA): Cultivating understanding internally to foster external change.","authors":"Jeffrey P Jaramillo, Sigmund Hough, Jillian Walker, Trisha Hicks, Florian P Thomas, Ellia Ciammaichella, Samantha Harfenist, Katharine Tam, Jessica Whitchurch","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2426312","DOIUrl":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2426312","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Healthcare institutions acknowledge the value of diverse workforces for enhancing programs and meeting the varied needs of individuals with Spinal Cord Injury. This survey conducted at the 2023 Academy of Spinal Cord Injury Professions (ASCIP) conference assesses healthcare professionals' views on workplace Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) and their support for integrating related educational content in future events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>: The survey was distributed digitally to ASCIP attendees, ensuring anonymity and voluntary participation. It aimed to collect data on demographic backgrounds, perceptions of DEI at work, and the relevance of educational topics regarding Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Access (IDEA) for upcoming conference agendas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: Seventy percent of respondents felt able to achieve success and express their genuine feelings in the workplace, with their opinions valued. While economic disparities were often discussed (56%) in relation to patient care, other aspects like religion, cultural racism, racial inequalities, and LGBTQ + issues were less frequently addressed. Approximately 55% reported that their organizations had recently started or were initiating DEI efforts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>: There is a clear need for inclusive work environments and patient care that values the diverse intersectionality of the community served. Strong support exists for further educational initiatives on IDEA concepts, highlighting a significant opportunity to enhance early-stage DEI programs in healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"161-169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864015/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142689374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}