向患有SCI/D的同伴传达关心和积极的信息可以改善志愿者写信者的孤独感。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sherri L LaVela, Kelsey Berryman, Marissa Wirth, Keith Aguina, Brian Bartle, R Lorie Jacob, Charles H Bombardier, Robert W Motl
{"title":"向患有SCI/D的同伴传达关心和积极的信息可以改善志愿者写信者的孤独感。","authors":"Sherri L LaVela, Kelsey Berryman, Marissa Wirth, Keith Aguina, Brian Bartle, R Lorie Jacob, Charles H Bombardier, Robert W Motl","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2524223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Peer-based volunteering is a potential strategy to alleviate loneliness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of participating as a volunteer letter writer on pre/post-program loneliness outcomes and to examine experiences with participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Volunteers with spinal cord injury/dysfunction (SCI/D) participated in a 6-month program writing letters to peers. Mixed methods were used to evaluate volunteers' experiences with the letter writing program. Pre/post loneliness outcomes were examined using a paired t-test. Post-program evaluation included satisfaction, benefit, and negative impact ratings. Qualitative interviews were coded inductively and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Volunteer peer letter writers (<i>n</i> = 28) were male (82%), had paraplegia (57%) and incomplete injuries (50%). On average they were 55 years of age and injured for 18 years. Volunteer peer letter writers with SCI/D had a statistically significant reduction in loneliness from pre- to post-program (3-item UCLA score 4.0 to 3.7, P = .04). The majority found the program beneficial (72%), with no/neutral negative impacts (93%), and were satisfied (82%). Volunteer peers with SCI/D: (1) liked and felt good about helping others with SCI/D; (2) believed the program provided an opportunity for self-reflection, including awareness and appreciation of their own circumstances and social connections; (3) liked sharing their injury experiences with and being connected to the letter recipient, and (4) found value in the writing process itself.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Loneliness was reduced in peer letter writers from pre- to post-program. Volunteers had beneficial and satisfactory experiences. Work to develop and test interventions peer-based volunteering intervention to address loneliness and other psychosocial outcomes is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communicating messages of care and positivity to peers with SCI/D improves loneliness in volunteer letter writers.\",\"authors\":\"Sherri L LaVela, Kelsey Berryman, Marissa Wirth, Keith Aguina, Brian Bartle, R Lorie Jacob, Charles H Bombardier, Robert W Motl\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2025.2524223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Peer-based volunteering is a potential strategy to alleviate loneliness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of participating as a volunteer letter writer on pre/post-program loneliness outcomes and to examine experiences with participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Volunteers with spinal cord injury/dysfunction (SCI/D) participated in a 6-month program writing letters to peers. Mixed methods were used to evaluate volunteers' experiences with the letter writing program. Pre/post loneliness outcomes were examined using a paired t-test. Post-program evaluation included satisfaction, benefit, and negative impact ratings. Qualitative interviews were coded inductively and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Volunteer peer letter writers (<i>n</i> = 28) were male (82%), had paraplegia (57%) and incomplete injuries (50%). On average they were 55 years of age and injured for 18 years. Volunteer peer letter writers with SCI/D had a statistically significant reduction in loneliness from pre- to post-program (3-item UCLA score 4.0 to 3.7, P = .04). The majority found the program beneficial (72%), with no/neutral negative impacts (93%), and were satisfied (82%). Volunteer peers with SCI/D: (1) liked and felt good about helping others with SCI/D; (2) believed the program provided an opportunity for self-reflection, including awareness and appreciation of their own circumstances and social connections; (3) liked sharing their injury experiences with and being connected to the letter recipient, and (4) found value in the writing process itself.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Loneliness was reduced in peer letter writers from pre- to post-program. Volunteers had beneficial and satisfactory experiences. Work to develop and test interventions peer-based volunteering intervention to address loneliness and other psychosocial outcomes is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2524223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2524223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于同伴的志愿服务是缓解孤独感的一种潜在策略。目的:评估作为一名志愿写信者对项目前后孤独感结果的影响,并检查参与后的经历。方法:脊髓损伤/功能障碍(SCI/D)志愿者参加了一个为期6个月的给同伴写信的项目。使用混合方法来评估志愿者在书信写作项目中的经历。孤独感前后结果采用配对t检验。项目后评估包括满意度、收益和负面影响评分。定性访谈采用归纳编码,并采用定性内容分析进行分析。结果:志愿同行写信者(n = 28)为男性(82%),有截瘫(57%)和不完全性损伤(50%)。他们的平均年龄为55岁,受伤时间为18年。SCI/D志愿者同伴写信者的孤独感从项目前到项目后显著降低(3项UCLA得分4.0到3.7,P = 0.04)。大多数人认为该计划有益(72%),没有/中性负面影响(93%),满意(82%)。脊髓损伤/残疾志愿者:(1)喜欢并乐于帮助其他脊髓损伤/残疾志愿者;(2)认为该项目提供了一个自我反思的机会,包括意识和欣赏自己的环境和社会关系;(3)喜欢与收信人分享他们的受伤经历,并与他们建立联系;(4)在写作过程中发现了价值。结论:同伴写信者的孤独感从计划前到计划后有所减少。志愿者获得了有益和满意的经历。需要制定和测试干预措施,以同伴为基础的志愿干预措施来解决孤独和其他社会心理后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communicating messages of care and positivity to peers with SCI/D improves loneliness in volunteer letter writers.

Context: Peer-based volunteering is a potential strategy to alleviate loneliness.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of participating as a volunteer letter writer on pre/post-program loneliness outcomes and to examine experiences with participation.

Methods: Volunteers with spinal cord injury/dysfunction (SCI/D) participated in a 6-month program writing letters to peers. Mixed methods were used to evaluate volunteers' experiences with the letter writing program. Pre/post loneliness outcomes were examined using a paired t-test. Post-program evaluation included satisfaction, benefit, and negative impact ratings. Qualitative interviews were coded inductively and analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Results: Volunteer peer letter writers (n = 28) were male (82%), had paraplegia (57%) and incomplete injuries (50%). On average they were 55 years of age and injured for 18 years. Volunteer peer letter writers with SCI/D had a statistically significant reduction in loneliness from pre- to post-program (3-item UCLA score 4.0 to 3.7, P = .04). The majority found the program beneficial (72%), with no/neutral negative impacts (93%), and were satisfied (82%). Volunteer peers with SCI/D: (1) liked and felt good about helping others with SCI/D; (2) believed the program provided an opportunity for self-reflection, including awareness and appreciation of their own circumstances and social connections; (3) liked sharing their injury experiences with and being connected to the letter recipient, and (4) found value in the writing process itself.

Conclusions: Loneliness was reduced in peer letter writers from pre- to post-program. Volunteers had beneficial and satisfactory experiences. Work to develop and test interventions peer-based volunteering intervention to address loneliness and other psychosocial outcomes is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信