Nursing Philosophy最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Corrigendum to Time for different stories: Reflections on IPONS panel addressing current debates in nursing theory, education, and practice. 不同故事的时间更正:IPONS小组讨论当前护理理论、教育和实践的辩论。
IF 2.2 3区 医学
Nursing Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1111/nup.12417
{"title":"Corrigendum to Time for different stories: Reflections on IPONS panel addressing current debates in nursing theory, education, and practice.","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/nup.12417","DOIUrl":"10.1111/nup.12417","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10656810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring tacit knowledge based on an expert nurse's practice for stroke patients. 基于脑卒中患者专业护士的实践探索隐性知识。
IF 2.2 3区 医学
Nursing Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-20 DOI: 10.1111/nup.12459
Satsuki Obama, Tsuyako Hidaka, Shizuko Tanigaki
{"title":"Exploring tacit knowledge based on an expert nurse's practice for stroke patients.","authors":"Satsuki Obama,&nbsp;Tsuyako Hidaka,&nbsp;Shizuko Tanigaki","doi":"10.1111/nup.12459","DOIUrl":"10.1111/nup.12459","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored tacit knowledge based on an expert nurse's practice who cares for stroke patients by using the hermeneutic phenomenological approach. The participant ('Ms. A') was a nursing researcher and college faculty member involved in the education of advanced practice nurses; her specialty was stroke rehabilitation nursing. She was asked to describe the meaning and value she gained from her memorable nursing experiences. Four interviews-approximately 1 h each-were conducted, and the associated data were interpreted together with the participant based on the method of interpretive circulation. Notably, the analysis was ended when a fusion of horizons was recognized. The participant recalled her nursing experiences based on six model cases. During the analysis, the following five elements were extracted: [belief in the ability of vulnerable people to survive]; [being together]; [respect for human dignity]; [preparedness to respond to and bear suffering together]; and [theoretical knowledge base approaches true understanding of patient experience]. Further, the nursing model-the Roy Adaptation Model-utilized by Ms. A in the process of recognizing humans as whole beings was deeply interpreted and implemented as a guideline for her implicit advanced practice. Moreover, her deep understanding and utilization of theoretical knowledge base also built the foundation for her implicit advanced practice. In conclusion, Ms. A's tacit knowledge and the elements support the process of tacit knowledge acquisition. Her narratives, hermeneutic attitude as an interpreter, and learning attitude throughout interaction with others will strongly help her knowledge development. We intend to continue the study with multiple participants and explore the structure of tacit knowledge possessed by advanced practitioners. Future endeavours will include the development of a tacit knowledge learning strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9900678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The biological paradigm of psychosis in crisis: A Kuhnian analysis. 危机中精神病的生物学范式:Kuhnian分析。
IF 2.2 3区 医学
Nursing Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-13 DOI: 10.1111/nup.12418
Mark Pearson, Stefan R Egglestone, Gary Winship
{"title":"The biological paradigm of psychosis in crisis: A Kuhnian analysis.","authors":"Mark Pearson,&nbsp;Stefan R Egglestone,&nbsp;Gary Winship","doi":"10.1111/nup.12418","DOIUrl":"10.1111/nup.12418","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The philosophy of Thomas Kuhn proposes that scientific progress involves periods of crisis and revolution in which previous paradigms are discarded and replaced. Revolutions in how mental health problems are conceptualised have had a substantial impact on the work of mental health nurses. However, despite numerous revolutions within the field of mental health, the biological paradigm has remained largely dominant within western healthcare, especially in orientating the understanding and treatment of psychosis. This paper utilises concepts drawn from the philosophy of Thomas Kuhn to explore the impact of what Kuhn terms 'anomalies' within the dominant biological paradigm: the anomaly of the meaningful utterance, the anomaly of complex aetiology and taxonomy and the anomaly of pharmacological inefficacy in recovery. The paper argues that the biological paradigm for understanding psychosis is in crisis and explores the implications for mental health nursing.</p>","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9263491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
On Bender's orientation to models: Towards a philosophical debate on covering laws, theory, emergence and mechanisms in nursing science. 论本德对模式的定位:关于护理科学中的法律、理论、出现和机制的哲学辩论。
IF 2.2 3区 医学
Nursing Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-18 DOI: 10.1111/nup.12439
Michael Clinton
{"title":"On Bender's orientation to models: Towards a philosophical debate on covering laws, theory, emergence and mechanisms in nursing science.","authors":"Michael Clinton","doi":"10.1111/nup.12439","DOIUrl":"10.1111/nup.12439","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nursing scholars continuously refine nursing knowledge and the philosophical foundations of nursing practice. They advance nursing knowledge by creating new knowledge and weighing the relevance of developments in cognate sciences. Nurse philosophers go further by providing epistemological and ontological arguments for explanations of nursing phenomena. In this article, I engage with Bender's arguments about why mechanisms should have more primacy as carriers of nursing knowledge. Despite the careful scholarship involved, Bender's arguments need to be more convincing. Accordingly, this article encourages debate about Bender's arguments for reorientating nursing science to mechanisms. I begin by suggesting that the claim that the theory-practice divide can be overcome by reorientating to mechanisms is acceptable only if we accept Bender's depiction of the challenge. Then I question the ontology Bender relies on to justify reorientating nursing science. After that, I argue that mechanisms in models that parallel analytical sociology undermine the kind of nursing science Bender advocates. I illustrate my arguments with a social mechanism thought experiment. Then I explain why Bender's arguments cannot escape the received view of science or inform emancipatory nursing action without theory. Finally, I mention some caveats and implications for nursing science.</p>","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9317678","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Creating theory: Encouragement for using creativity and deduction in qualitative nursing research. 创造理论:鼓励在定性护理研究中运用创造性和演绎性。
IF 2.2 3区 医学
Nursing Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-27 DOI: 10.1111/nup.12421
Elisabeth Bergdahl, Carina M Berterö
{"title":"Creating theory: Encouragement for using creativity and deduction in qualitative nursing research.","authors":"Elisabeth Bergdahl,&nbsp;Carina M Berterö","doi":"10.1111/nup.12421","DOIUrl":"10.1111/nup.12421","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Texts about theory in nursing often refer to theory construction by using inductive methods in a rigid way. In this paper, it is instead argued that theories are created, which is in line with most philosophers of science. Theory creation is regarded as a creative process that does not follow a specific method or logic. As in any creative endeavour, the inspiration for theory creation can come from many sources, including previous research and existing theory. The main idea put forward is that deductive qualitative research approaches should play a key role in theory creation. Furthermore, there is a need to differentiate between theory creation and theory justification. A model that emphasizes the creative aspects of theory creation and theory justification using qualitative approaches is presented. The model suggests that knowledge development is a deductive trial-and-error process where theory creation is followed by testing. Scientific theory creation and justification are presented as an iterative process that is deductive in that a testable hypothesis is derived from the theory. If the hypothesis is falsified, then the theory needs modification or might be altogether wrong. Several factors can block the creative process, both in theory development and in finding ways to test a theory in the justification phase. Some of these blockers are the idea of 'building blocks' and the inductive view of science often brought forward in nursing. Other blockers include striving for consensus and adherence to existing nursing philosophies and existing theories. Research and knowledge development are creative processes, and following predefined methods is not enough to ensure scientific rigour in qualitative nursing research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10779433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A response to Michael Clinton's On Bender's orientation to models: Towards a philosophical debate on covering laws, theory, emergence and mechanisms in nursing science. 对迈克尔·克林顿的《论本德对模型的定位:走向一场关于护理科学中的法律、理论、出现和机制的哲学辩论》的回应。
IF 2.2 3区 医学
Nursing Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-22 DOI: 10.1111/nup.12463
Miriam Bender
{"title":"A response to Michael Clinton's On Bender's orientation to models: Towards a philosophical debate on covering laws, theory, emergence and mechanisms in nursing science.","authors":"Miriam Bender","doi":"10.1111/nup.12463","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12463","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>My purpose in this short response to Clinton's interesting article On Bender's orientation to models: Towards a philosophical debate on covering laws, theory, emergence and mechanisms in nursing science, which is published in this issue, is not to provide any counterargument to Clinton's interpretation of my own argument; readers are welcome to interrogate both articles at their leisure and make their own conclusions. What I will do instead is provide a brief critical assessment of my own (il)logic re bringing in the notion of mechanism as conceived by Machamer, Darden and Craver into an argument for models versus theories as a carrier of nursing knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41137274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial preface: The role of subjectivity, intersubjectivity, and power relations in the delivery of humane nursing care. 编辑前言:主体性、主体间性和权力关系在提供人道护理中的作用。
IF 2.6 3区 医学
Nursing Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-18 DOI: 10.1111/nup.12461
Stefanos Mantzoukas, Miriam Bender
{"title":"Editorial preface: The role of subjectivity, intersubjectivity, and power relations in the delivery of humane nursing care.","authors":"Stefanos Mantzoukas, Miriam Bender","doi":"10.1111/nup.12461","DOIUrl":"10.1111/nup.12461","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10286031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The machine of caring: A book review of Philosophy of Care By BorisGroys, London, New York: Verso Books. 2022. pp. 112. $22.95 AUD. ISBN: 9781839764929 关怀的机器:鲍里斯·格罗伊斯《关怀哲学》书评,伦敦,纽约:Verso Books, 2022。112页。$ 22.95澳元。ISBN: 9781839764929
3区 医学
Nursing Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI: 10.1111/nup.12465
Matthew Tieu
{"title":"The machine of caring: A book review of <i>Philosophy of Care</i> By BorisGroys, London, New York: Verso Books. 2022. pp. 112. $22.95 AUD. ISBN: 9781839764929","authors":"Matthew Tieu","doi":"10.1111/nup.12465","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12465","url":null,"abstract":"Nursing PhilosophyEarly View e12465 BOOK REVIEW The machine of caring: A book review of Philosophy of Care By Boris Groys, London, New York: Verso Books. 2022. pp. 112. $22.95 AUD. ISBN: 9781839764929 Matthew Tieu PhD, Matthew Tieu PhD Research Fellow [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-6579 College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this author Matthew Tieu PhD, Matthew Tieu PhD Research Fellow [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-6579 College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 28 September 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12465Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issuee12465 RelatedInformation","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135387267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A response to michael clinton. on bender's orientation to models: Towards a philosophical debate on covering laws, theory, emergence and mechanisms in nursing science. 对迈克尔·克林顿的回应。论本德对模型的定位:关于护理科学中的规律、理论、出现和机制的哲学辩论。
IF 2.2 3区 医学
Nursing Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI: 10.1111/nup.12462
{"title":"A response to michael clinton. on bender's orientation to models: Towards a philosophical debate on covering laws, theory, emergence and mechanisms in nursing science.","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/nup.12462","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12462","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41160162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From 'if-then' to 'what if?' Rethinking healthcare algorithmics with posthuman speculative ethics. 从“如果-那么”到“如果”?用后人类思辨伦理重新思考医疗算法。
IF 2.2 3区 医学
Nursing Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI: 10.1111/nup.12447
Jamie Smith, Goda Klumbyte, Ren Loren Britton
{"title":"From 'if-then' to 'what if?' Rethinking healthcare algorithmics with posthuman speculative ethics.","authors":"Jamie Smith,&nbsp;Goda Klumbyte,&nbsp;Ren Loren Britton","doi":"10.1111/nup.12447","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12447","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article discusses the role that algorithmic thinking and management play in health care and the kind of exclusions this might create. We argue that evidence-based medicine relies on research and data to create pathways for patient journeys. Coupled with data-based algorithmic prediction tools in health care, they establish what could be called health care algorithmics-a mode of management of healthcare that produces forms of algorithmic governmentality. Relying on a critical posthumanist perspective, we show how healthcare algorithmics is contingent on the way authority over bodies is produced and how predictive health care algorithms can reproduce inequalities of the worlds from which they are made, centreing possible futures on existing normativities regulated through algorithmic biopower. In contrast to that, we explore posthuman speculative ethics as a way to challenge understanding of 'ethics' and 'care' in healthcare algorithmics. We suggest some possible avenues towards working speculative ethics into health care while still being critically attentive to algorithmic modes of management and prediction in health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9677113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信