Studies in History and Philosophy of Science最新文献_第2页

Response to Wehner et al. (2023). 对Wehner等人（2023）的回应。

IF 1.8 2区哲学

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-08-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.07.005

Kelle Dhein

引用次数: 0

Explaining with simulation models 用模拟模型解释

IF 1.8 2区哲学

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-07-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.07.003

Matthias Ackermann

引用次数: 0

Embedded Ecology: The Partnership Flywheel for integrating local expertise 嵌入式生态：整合当地专业知识的伙伴关系飞轮

IF 1.4 2区哲学

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-07-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.012

Jesse Hamilton , Jacqueline Mae Wallis

{"title":"Embedded Ecology: The Partnership Flywheel for integrating local expertise","authors":"Jesse Hamilton , Jacqueline Mae Wallis","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.012","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.012","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There have been increasing calls to improve the integration of local expertise into both scientific research and evidence-based policy development, especially for urgent problems like climate change. There are both epistemic and ethical benefits of better involving local communities in these knowledge-generating processes. Here we present a community science process model for integrating the expertise of local communities, developed through field analysis of a community science endeavor in the Galápagos Islands. We call this kind of collaboration “embedded ecology.” The process of embedded ecology is modeled by what we call the Partnership Flywheel, which includes phases for ideation, planning, implementation, and learning. The importance of sustained collaboration between external practitioners and a local community cannot be overstated, which is one reason the flywheel is iterative, allowing the focus to be on sustained project generation and improvement. After discussing the practical elements of the Partnership Flywheel process model, we argue that its simplicity and replicability are essential for any process model aimed at improving the integration of local expertise in community science, thereby addressing both current and enduring challenges in the field. In sum, we present and explore a new community science process model thus advancing a recently growing literature on the theory of participatory research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 179-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144655790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Communal philosophy? A possible framework for academia-community interaction 公共哲学?学术界与社区互动的可能框架

IF 1.4 2区哲学

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-07-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.010

Yael Silver , Ayelet Shavit

引用次数: 0

Questioning local wisdom in Indonesian Indigenous research 质疑印尼原住民研究中的当地智慧

IF 1.4 2区哲学

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-07-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.07.001

Rangga Kala Mahaswa , Ainu Syaja

{"title":"Questioning local wisdom in Indonesian Indigenous research","authors":"Rangga Kala Mahaswa , Ainu Syaja","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.07.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.07.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article explores the shifting dynamics of local wisdom (<em>kearifan lokal</em>) as a research category within Indonesian academic discourse, particularly as reflected in journal publications that prominently feature the term in their titles. Although local wisdom is frequently equated with Indigenous knowledge, such conflation remains only partially accurate. While there are points of intersection, notable conceptual divergences persist underscoring the need to examine how local wisdom is understood, invoked, and positioned within the epistemological landscape of Indonesian scholarship. Drawing on a brief survey conducted through <em>Publish or Perish</em> software, the article outlines a provisional typology that captures how local wisdom is articulated across academic contexts. These findings suggest that local wisdom functions less as a stable or singular body of knowledge, and more as a discursive space shaped by a range of intellectual idealisms, situated commitments, and methodological compromises. Researchers engaging with this theme appear to navigate a delicate tension: between preserving the emic, often orally transmitted dimensions of local knowledge, and responding to disciplinary expectations rooted in scientific rationalism. At the same time, there is evidence of a latent ethnonationalist sentiment that further complicates the positioning of local wisdom within broader efforts to decolonize knowledge production in Indonesia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 170-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144614336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Trialability Trialability

IF 1.4 2区哲学

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.07.002

Sven Ove Hansson

引用次数: 0

Does diversity promote exclusion? 多样性促进排斥吗？

IF 1.4 2区哲学

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-07-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.009

Yael Silver , Ayelet Shavit

{"title":"Does diversity promote exclusion?","authors":"Yael Silver , Ayelet Shavit","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We argue that the typical meanings and operationalizations of <em>diversity</em> are practically linked to <em>dichotomy</em> and hamper equity practices in the academia. Scientists and scholars in mainstream Western society widely agree that achieving social justice requires promoting diversity in science and society. Diversity refers to differences existing in a set of entities, and ‘human diversity’ in academic research and social practice typically refers to racial, ethnic or gender differences in designated groups. Diversity is expected to promote inclusion by recognizing these differences and demanding equal representation in science and society. However, we argue that the operationalization of ‘diversity’ is actually disposed to produce dichotomy, thus often ending in a stereotypic portrayal of underrepresented groups rather than promoting their inclusion. We describe the informal and formal meanings of diversity measures and their usage in an academic course devoted to equity in education. We explain – at least partly – why this discourse tends to dichotomize a complex social phenomenon, inadvertently exacerbating the challenges faced by underrepresented groups. To conclude: promoting social justice requires inclusion; inclusion requires diversity, yet the implementation of a particular set of practices of diversity leads to a dichotomy that increases divergence, distancing us from inclusion. Thus, current practices of ‘diversity’ may actually undercut rather than encourage the reduction of social injustice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 133-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144580587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Why did the dark matter hypothesis supersede modified gravity in the 1980s? 为什么暗物质假说在20世纪80年代取代了修正引力理论？

IF 1.4 2区哲学

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-07-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.006

Antonis Antoniou

{"title":"Why did the dark matter hypothesis supersede modified gravity in the 1980s?","authors":"Antonis Antoniou","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the 1960s and 1970s a series of observations and theoretical developments highlighted the presence of several anomalies which could, in principle, be explained by postulating one of the following two working hypotheses: (i) the existence of dark matter, or (ii) the modification of standard gravitational dynamics in low accelerations. In the years that followed, the dark matter hypothesis as an explanation for dark matter phenomenology attracted far more attention compared to the hypothesis of modified gravity, and the latter is largely regarded today as a non-viable alternative. The present article takes an integrated history and philosophy of science approach in order to identify the reasons why the scientific community mainly pursued the dark matter hypothesis in the years that followed, as opposed to modified gravity. A plausible answer is given in terms of three epistemic criteria for the pursuitworthiness of a hypothesis: (a) its problem-solving potential, (b) its compatibility with established theories and the feasibility of incorporation, and (c) its independent testability. A further comparison between the problem of dark matter and the problem of dark energy is also presented, explaining why in the latter case the situation is different, and modified gravity is still considered a viable possibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49467,"journal":{"name":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science","volume":"112 ","pages":"Pages 141-152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144580588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The descent of blushing: On the connection between Darwin's anti-slavery positions and his explanation of the origin of emotional expression 脸红的由来：论达尔文的反奴隶制立场与他对情绪表达起源的解释之间的联系

IF 1.4 2区哲学

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-07-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.013

Santiago Ginnobili

引用次数: 0

A minimalist account of agency in physics 物理学中对能动性的极简解释

IF 1.4 2区哲学

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-07-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.06.004

Ali Barzegar , Emilia Margoni , Daniele Oriti

引用次数: 0