Neuroethics最新文献_第7页

The Unintended Consequences of Chile’s Neurorights Constitutional Reform: Moving beyond Negative Rights to Capabilities 智利神经权利宪法改革的意外后果:超越消极权利到能力

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2022-08-24 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-022-09504-z

J. Fins

引用次数: 8

Against Aggression? Revisiting an Overlooked Contender for Moral Bioenhancement 反对侵略?重新审视道德生物增强的一个被忽视的竞争者

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2022-06-16 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-022-09501-2

Cohen Marcus Lionel Brown

引用次数: 0

Identifying the Presence of Ethics Concepts in Chronic Pain Research: A Scoping Review of Neuroscience Journals 慢性疼痛研究中伦理学概念的存在:神经科学期刊的范围综述

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2022-06-14 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-022-09499-7

Rajita Sharma, Samuel A. Dale, Sapna Wadhawan, Melanie Anderson, Daniel Z. Buchman

引用次数: 2

Trust and Psychedelic Moral Enhancement 信任与迷幻道德提升

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2022-05-25 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-022-09497-9

E. Gordon

引用次数: 1

Review of Walter Glannon’s The Neuroethics of Memory: From Total Recall to Oblivion, Cambridge University Press, 2019 沃尔特·格兰农《记忆的神经伦理学：从全面回忆到遗忘》，剑桥大学出版社，2019

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2022-05-13 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-022-09495-x

E. Racine

引用次数: 0

Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease: Why Earlier Use Makes Shared Decision Making Important 帕金森病的脑深部刺激：为什么早期使用使共同决策变得重要

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2022-04-24 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-022-09496-w

Jaime Montemayor, H. Sarva, Karen Kelly-Blake, L. Cabrera

引用次数: 1

The Illusion of Agency in Human–Computer Interaction 人机交互中的代理幻觉

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2022-04-05 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-022-09491-1

Michael Madary

{"title":"The Illusion of Agency in Human–Computer Interaction","authors":"Michael Madary","doi":"10.1007/s12152-022-09491-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-022-09491-1","url":null,"abstract":"This article makes the case that our digital devices create illusions of agency. There are times when users feel as if they are in control when in fact they are merely responding to stimuli on the screen in predictable ways. After the introduction, the second section of the article offers examples of illusions of agency that do not involve human–computer interaction in order to show that such illusions are possible and not terribly uncommon. The third and fourth sections of the article cover relevant work from empirical psychology, including the cues that are known to generate the sense of agency. The fifth section of the article shows that our devices are designed to deliver precisely those cues. In the sixth section, the argument is completed with evidence that users frequently use their smartphones without the sort of intentional supervision involved in genuine agency. This sixth section includes the introduction of Digital Environmental Dependency Syndrome (DEDS) as a possible way of characterizing extended use of the smartphone without genuine agency. In the final section of the article, there is a discussion of questions raised by the main claim, including suggestions for reducing occurrences of illusions of agency through software design.","PeriodicalId":49255,"journal":{"name":"Neuroethics","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138536782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Moral Neuroenhancement for Prisoners of War 战俘的道德神经增强

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-022-09482-2

Blake Hereth

引用次数: 1

The Case of Hannah Capes: How Much Does Consciousness Matter? 汉娜·卡普斯案:意识有多重要?

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2022-03-15 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-022-09480-4

Lois Shepherd, C. William Pike, Jesse B. Persily, Mary Faith Marshall

{"title":"The Case of Hannah Capes: How Much Does Consciousness Matter?","authors":"Lois Shepherd, C. William Pike, Jesse B. Persily, Mary Faith Marshall","doi":"10.1007/s12152-022-09480-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-022-09480-4","url":null,"abstract":"A recent legal case involving an ambiguous diagnosis in a woman with a severe disorder of consciousness raises pressing questions about treatment withdrawal in a time when much of what experts know about disorders of consciousness is undergoing revision and refinement. How much should diagnostic certainty about consciousness matter? For the judge who refused to allow withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration, it was dispositive. Rather than relying on substituted judgment or best interests to determine treatment decisions, he ruled that withdrawal was categorically prohibited, even as he concluded that Hannah Capes was more likely than not in a permanent vegetative state. In many jurisdictions, his decision would likely be consistent with existing law. Evolving technological advances have demonstrated that biologically distinct diagnoses incorporated into state laws may be difficult to establish even under ideal conditions. We offer the Capes case for purposes of examining the consequences of enshrined legal distinctions between permanent vegetative state and other severe disorders of consciousness. Insistence on proof of the permanent absence of consciousness before treatment withdrawal is allowed fails to respect the rights of persons with disorders of consciousness. Even the well-established rights to treatment withdrawal for those in a permanent vegetative state may be in jeopardy if reform is not undertaken.","PeriodicalId":49255,"journal":{"name":"Neuroethics","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138536799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Do Different Kinds of Minds Need Different Kinds of Services? Qualitative Results from a Mixed-Method Survey of Service Preferences of Autistic Adults and Parents 不同的人需要不同的服务吗?孤独症成人和父母服务偏好的混合方法调查的定性结果

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2022-03-11 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-022-09487-x

M. Ariel Cascio, Eric Racine

{"title":"Do Different Kinds of Minds Need Different Kinds of Services? Qualitative Results from a Mixed-Method Survey of Service Preferences of Autistic Adults and Parents","authors":"M. Ariel Cascio, Eric Racine","doi":"10.1007/s12152-022-09487-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-022-09487-x","url":null,"abstract":"Many services can assist autistic people, such as early intervention, vocational services, or support groups. Scholars and activists debate whether such services should be autism-specific or more general/inclusive/mainstream. This debate rests on not only clinical reasoning, but also ethical and social reasoning about values and practicalities of diversity and inclusion. This paper presents qualitative results from a mixed-methods study. An online survey asked autistic adults and parents of autistic people of any age in Canada, the United States, Italy, France, and Germany what types of services they prefer (autism-specific, mixed-disability, or general/inclusive/mainstream). This paper presents the advantages and disadvantages of different service types, identified through inductive thematic coding and organized into higher-level themes focusing on clinical, structural, societal, interpersonal, and personal aspects of services. Autism-specific services were praised for addressing autism needs, helping clinically, and providing interpersonal benefits of others understanding autism; general services were praised for inclusion, helping clinically, community obligations and awareness, and social skills development. Looking at the interaction of these different aspects in respondent narratives nuances debates about autism-specificity, with a complex interplay between clinical, interpersonal, and societal aspects. Clinical and social perspectives are not necessarily separate and opposed, but intertwined based on different understandings of inclusion. Compared to parents, adults focused more on harm/safety issues, enjoyment, and stereotyping among other themes, attending to personal themes. These findings do not identify one best service type, but suggest that determining the right service in a given context may be informed by definitions of and goals about inclusion.","PeriodicalId":49255,"journal":{"name":"Neuroethics","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138536783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3