Neuroethics最新文献_第10页

Towards a Governance Framework for Brain Data 迈向大脑数据的治理框架

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2021-09-24 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-022-09498-8

M. Ienca, J. Fins, R. Jox, F. Jotterand, S. Voeneky, R. Andorno, T. Ball, C. Castelluccia, Ricardo Chavarriaga, H. Chneiweiss, Agata Ferretti, O. Friedrich, S. Hurst, Grischa Merkel, Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor, Jean-Marc Rickli, J. Scheibner, E. Vayena, Rafael Yuste Philipp Kellmeyer

引用次数: 20

An Afro-Communitarian Relational Approach to Brain Surrogates Research 脑替代物研究的非社群关系方法

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2021-08-30 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-021-09475-7

L. Cordeiro‐Rodrigues, Cornelius Ewuoso

引用次数: 3

The Impact of Dementia on the Self: Do We Consider Ourselves the Same as Others? 痴呆症对自我的影响：我们认为自己和别人一样吗？

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2021-08-02 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-021-09472-w

Sophia A. Harris, A. Baird, Steve Matthews, J. Kennett, R. Gelding, Celia B. Harris

引用次数: 0

Forensic Brain-Reading and Mental Privacy in European Human Rights Law: Foundations and Challenges. 欧洲人权法中的法医脑读取和精神隐私：基础与挑战》。

IF 2.6 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2020-06-20 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-020-09438-4

Sjors Ligthart, Thomas Douglas, Christoph Bublitz, Tijs Kooijmans, Gerben Meynen

{"title":"Forensic Brain-Reading and Mental Privacy in European Human Rights Law: Foundations and Challenges.","authors":"Sjors Ligthart, Thomas Douglas, Christoph Bublitz, Tijs Kooijmans, Gerben Meynen","doi":"10.1007/s12152-020-09438-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12152-020-09438-4","url":null,"abstract":"A central question in the current neurolegal and neuroethical literature is how brain-reading technologies could contribute to criminal justice. Some of these technologies have already been deployed within different criminal justice systems in Europe, including Slovenia, Italy, England and Wales, and the Netherlands, typically to determine guilt, legal responsibility, or recidivism risk. In this regard, the question arises whether brain-reading could permissibly be used against the person's will. To provide adequate legal protection from such non-consensual brain-reading in the European legal context, ethicists have called for the recognition of a novel fundamental legal right to mental privacy. In this paper, we explore whether these ethical calls for recognising a novel legal right to mental privacy are necessary in the European context. We argue that a right to mental privacy could be derived from, or at least developed within in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, and that introducing an additional fundamental right to protect against (forensic) brain-reading is not necessary. What is required, however, is a specification of the implications of existing rights for particular neurotechnologies and purposes.","PeriodicalId":49255,"journal":{"name":"Neuroethics","volume":"14 ","pages":"191-203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7612400/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39939734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Revisiting Moral Bioenhancement and Autonomy 重新审视道德生物强化与自主性

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2021-06-22 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-021-09470-y

J. Y. Lee

引用次数: 1

Deterministic Attributions of Behavior: Brain versus Genes 行为的决定性归因：大脑与基因

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2021-06-11 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-021-09471-x

K. Peters, A. Kalinina, Nastassja M. Downer, Amy Van Elswyk

引用次数: 1

Shining a Light also Casts a Shadow: Neuroimaging Incidental Findings in Neuromarketing Research 发光也投下阴影：神经影像学在神经营销研究中的偶然发现

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2021-04-12 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-021-09463-x

Owen M. Bradfield

引用次数: 4

Next of kin’s Reactions to Results of Functional Neurodiagnostics of Disorders of Consciousness: a Question of Information Delivery or of Differing Epistemic Beliefs? 近亲对意识障碍功能性神经诊断结果的反应:是信息传递的问题还是不同认知信念的问题?

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2021-03-24 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-021-09462-y

K. Kuehlmeyer, A. Bender, R. Jox, E. Racine, Maria Ruhfass, Leah Schembs

引用次数: 1

What it Might Be like to Be a Group Agent 成为一名集团代理人可能是什么样子

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2021-03-02 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-021-09459-7

Max F. Kramer

引用次数: 4

Narrative Devices: Neurotechnologies, Information, and Self-Constitution. 叙事装置：神经技术、信息和自我构成。

IF 1.4 4区哲学

Neuroethics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-09-28 DOI: 10.1007/s12152-020-09449-1

Emily Postan

{"title":"Narrative Devices: Neurotechnologies, Information, and Self-Constitution.","authors":"Emily Postan","doi":"10.1007/s12152-020-09449-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s12152-020-09449-1","url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a conceptual and normative framework through which we may understand the potentially ethically significant roles that information generated by neurotechnologies about our brains and minds may play in our construction of our identities. Neuroethics debates currently focus disproportionately on the ways that third parties may (ab)use these kinds of information. These debates occlude interests we may have in whether and how we ourselves encounter information about our own brains and minds. This gap is not yet adequately addressed by most allusions in the literature to potential identity impacts. These lack the requisite conceptual or normative foundations to explain why we should be concerned about such effects or how they might be addressed. This article seeks to fill this gap by presenting a normative account of identity as constituted by embodied self-narratives. It proposes that information generated by neurotechnologies can play significant content-supplying and interpretive roles in our construction of our self-narratives. It argues, to the extent that these roles support and detract from the coherence and inhabitability of these narratives, access to information about our brains and minds engages non-trivial identity-related interests. These claims are illustrated using examples drawn from empirical literature reporting reactions to information generated by implantable predictive BCIs and psychiatric neuroimaging. The article concludes by highlighting ways in which information generated by neurotechnologies might be governed so as to protect information subjects' interests in developing and inhabiting their own identities.","PeriodicalId":49255,"journal":{"name":"Neuroethics","volume":"14 2","pages":"231-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549978/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39579441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0