Public Health Ethics最新文献_第6页

COVID-19 Vaccines and the Virtues. COVID-19疫苗及其优点。

IF 4.3 3区哲学

Public Health Ethics Pub Date : 2022-11-14 eCollection Date: 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/phe/phac027

Konrad V Boyneburgk, Francesca Bellazzi

引用次数: 0

Justifying the More Restrictive Alternative: Ethical Justifications for One Health AMR Policies Rely on Empirical Evidence. 为更严格的选择辩护：一个健康 AMR 政策的伦理理由依赖于经验证据。

IF 1.4 3区哲学

Public Health Ethics Pub Date : 2022-11-07 eCollection Date: 2023-04-01 DOI: 10.1093/phe/phac025

Tess Johnson, William Matlock

{"title":"Justifying the More Restrictive Alternative: Ethical Justifications for One Health AMR Policies Rely on Empirical Evidence.","authors":"Tess Johnson, William Matlock","doi":"10.1093/phe/phac025","DOIUrl":"10.1093/phe/phac025","url":null,"abstract":"Global consumption of antibiotics has accelerated the evolution of bacterial antimicrobial resistance. Yet, the risks from increasing bacterial antimicrobial resistance are not restricted to human populations: transmission of antimicrobial resistant bacteria occurs between humans, farms, the environment and other reservoirs. Policies that take a 'One Health' approach deal with this cross-reservoir spread, but are often more restrictive concerning human actions than policies that focus on a single reservoir. As such, the burden of justification lies with these more restrictive policies. We argue that an ethical justification for preferring One Health policies over less restrictive alternatives relies on empirical evidence as well as theory. The ethical justification for these policies is based on two arguments: (i) comparatively greater effectiveness, and (ii) comparatively better tracking of moral responsibility. Yet the empirical assumptions on which these claims rest are limited by existing empirical knowledge. Using livestock farming as an example, we suggest that scientific research into characterising antimicrobial resistance and linking practices to outcomes ought to be guided (at least in part) by the imperative to supply the context-specific data needed to ethically justify preferring a One Health policy over less restrictive alternatives.","PeriodicalId":49136,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Ethics","volume":"16 1","pages":"22-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10161525/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9423023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Maternal Referral Delays and a Culture of Downstream Blaming Among Healthcare Providers: Causes and Solutions. 产妇转诊延迟和下游指责医疗服务提供者的文化:原因和解决方案。

IF 2.1 3区哲学

Public Health Ethics Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/phe/phac021

Monali Mohan, Rakhi Ghoshal, Nobhojit Roy

引用次数: 0

The (Un)fairness of Vaccination Freeriding. 免费接种疫苗的公平性。

IF 2.1 3区哲学

Public Health Ethics Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/phe/phac028

Marcel Verweij

{"title":"The (Un)fairness of Vaccination Freeriding.","authors":"Marcel Verweij","doi":"10.1093/phe/phac028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phac028","url":null,"abstract":"For contagious diseases like measles a successful immunization program can result in herd protection. Small outbreaks may still occur but fade out soon, because the possibilities for the pathogen to spread in the 'herd' are very small. This implies that people who refuse to participate in such a program will still benefit from the protection it offers, but they don't do their part in maintaining protection. Isn't that a case of freeriding-and isn't that unfair towards all the people who do collaborate? If so, that might be considered an additional ground for making vaccination mandatory or compulsory. In this paper I argue that vaccination refusal can be considered as freeriding, but that this might not be unfair. The public good of herd protection is a peculiar public good because it supervenes on private benefits that are enjoyed by all who do opt for vaccination. For vaccinated individuals, the additional benefit of herd protection comes about, as it were, for free, and hence they can't complain that others benefit without sharing in the burdens. There are however still other grounds for making vaccination compulsory or at least for seeing refusal as a morally wrong choice.","PeriodicalId":49136,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Ethics","volume":"15 3","pages":"233-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9883725/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10696629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

How Mandatory Can We Make Vaccination? 如何强制接种疫苗?

IF 2.1 3区哲学

Public Health Ethics Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/phe/phac026

Ben Saunders

{"title":"How Mandatory Can We Make Vaccination?","authors":"Ben Saunders","doi":"10.1093/phe/phac026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phac026","url":null,"abstract":"The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has refocused attention on the issue of mandatory vaccination. Some have suggested that vaccines ought to be mandatory, while others propose more moderate alternatives, such as incentives. This piece surveys a range of possible interventions, ranging from mandates through to education. All may have their place, depending on circumstances. However, it is worth clarifying the options available to policymakers, since there is sometimes confusion over whether a particular policy constitutes a mandate or not. Further, I illustrate a different kind of alternative to mandatory vaccination. Rather than seeking less coercive alternatives to a mandate, we might instead employ an alternative mandate, which requires people to do something less than get vaccinated. For instance, we might merely require people to attend an appointment at a vaccine clinic. Whether this mandatory attendance policy is justified will depend on specific circumstances, but it represents another way to promote vaccination, without mandating it. In some cases, this may represent an appropriate balance between promoting public health goals and respecting individual liberty.","PeriodicalId":49136,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Ethics","volume":"15 3","pages":"220-232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9883718/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10696630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

The Language of Incarceration and of Persons Subject to Incarceration 监禁的语言和被监禁者的语言

IF 2.1 3区哲学

Public Health Ethics Pub Date : 2022-10-19 DOI: 10.1093/phe/phac024

L. Reid

引用次数: 0

Informed Decision-Making and Capabilities in Population-based Cancer Screening. 基于人口的癌症筛查中的知情决策和能力。

IF 1.4 3区哲学

Public Health Ethics Pub Date : 2022-10-03 eCollection Date: 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1093/phe/phac023

Ineke L L E Bolt, Maartje H N Schermer, Hanna Bomhof-Roordink, Danielle R M Timmermans

{"title":"Informed Decision-Making and Capabilities in Population-based Cancer Screening.","authors":"Ineke L L E Bolt, Maartje H N Schermer, Hanna Bomhof-Roordink, Danielle R M Timmermans","doi":"10.1093/phe/phac023","DOIUrl":"10.1093/phe/phac023","url":null,"abstract":"Informed decision-making (IDM) is considered an important ethical and legal requirement for population-based screening. Governments offering such screening have a duty to enable invitees to make informed decisions regarding participation. Various views exist on how to define and measure IDM in different screening programmes. In this paper we first address the question which components should be part of IDM in the context of cancer screening. Departing from two diverging interpretations of the value of autonomy-as a right and as an ideal-we describe how this value is operationalized in the practice of informed consent in medicine and translate this to IDM in population-based cancer screening. Next, we specify components of IDM, which is voluntariness and the requirements of disclosure and understanding. We argue that whereas disclosure should contain all information considered relevant in order to enable authentic IDM, understanding of basic information is sufficient for a valid IDM. In the second part of the paper we apply the capability approach in order to argue for the responsibility of the government to warrant equal and real opportunities for invitees for IDM. We argue that additional conditions beyond mere provision of information are needed in order to do so.","PeriodicalId":49136,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Ethics","volume":"15 3","pages":"289-300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ec/54/phac023.PMC9883722.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10642157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Realizing Ubuntu in Global Health: An African Approach to Global Health Justice 实现全球健康的Ubuntu:非洲实现全球健康正义的途径

IF 2.1 3区哲学

Public Health Ethics Pub Date : 2022-09-17 DOI: 10.1093/phe/phac022

N. Jecker, C. Atuire, Nora Kenworthy

引用次数: 2

Holly Wardlow, Fencing in AIDS: Gender, Vulnerability and Care in Papua New Guinea Holly Wardlow，艾滋病击剑：巴布亚新几内亚的性别、脆弱性和护理

IF 2.1 3区哲学

Public Health Ethics Pub Date : 2022-09-07 DOI: 10.1093/phe/phac020

Katherine Furman

引用次数: 0

James Wilson. Philosophy for Public Health & Policy: Beyond the Neglectful State 詹姆士·威尔逊。公共卫生与政策哲学:超越忽视状态