{"title":"From action to inscription: a structural–contextual analysis of physical information","authors":"Maksym Altunin","doi":"10.1007/s13194-026-00753-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00753-w","url":null,"abstract":"This article develops a structural–contextual account of how physical information is generated, stabilized, and rendered objectively determinate. Rather than treating information as ontologically primitive, the paper develops a framework in which quantized action provides a lower physical scale for the discrimination of alternatives, while contextual constraints determine when and how a specific informational value may be objectively attributed. First, the quantum of action <inline-formula><tex-math>documentclass[12pt]{minimal} usepackage{amsmath} usepackage{wasysym} usepackage{amsfonts} usepackage{amssymb} usepackage{amsbsy} usepackage{mathrsfs} usepackage{upgreek} setlength{oddsidemargin}{-69pt} begin{document}$$hbar$$end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> is not itself a bit, but sets a characteristic lower action scale for the registration of physically significant distinctions in phase-sensitive physical settings. Second, drawing on the Kochen–Specker theorem, the paper argues that informational values cannot be straightforwardly treated as globally pre-assigned across all contexts; rather, their determinate attribution is context-relative. Third, it introduces the notion of <italic>inscription</italic>, understood as the stabilization of a contextually generated distinction through a stabilizing structural condition, such as topological protection or metastable energetic separation. Such stabilization turns an otherwise transient distinction into objective, physically stored information. Taken together, these claims support a physically grounded account on which objective physical information is not fundamental but emerges from the interplay of quantized action, structural context, and structural stabilization, in a sense that does not depend on any particular observer’s knowledge or interpretation. The resulting framework complements rather than replaces existing approaches, offering a synthetic reinterpretation of the relationship between dynamics, context, and informational content.","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148286285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The pursuitworthiness of majority world psychology","authors":"Jane Suilin Lavelle","doi":"10.1007/s13194-026-00748-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00748-7","url":null,"abstract":"The recent pluralist turn in philosophy of science claims that we ought to support and maintain multiple epistemic frameworks for learning about phenomena. This position is especially clear in Massimi’s Perspectival Realism, which argues that it is only by having more than one perspective on a phenomenon that the potential for reliable knowledge about it emerges. This paper applies Perspectival Realism to the case of psychology—with a focus on developmental psychology—arguing first, that the discipline has pursued frameworks almost exclusively within a Minority World perspective, and second, that the lack of alternative perspectives precludes the field from knowing if its methods of knowledge production are reliable. To redress this problem, it advocates the pursuit of Majority World psychological frameworks, and points towards ways in which this could be achieved.","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148286286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Participation and immersive imagination in thought experiments","authors":"Daniele Molinari","doi":"10.1007/s13194-026-00746-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00746-9","url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that immersive participation is an epistemic strategy that shapes how thought experiments (“TEs”) are interpreted and contested within research communities. Building on Waltonian fictionalist approaches, I argue that their focus on work worlds and fictional truths leaves the productive role of immersion in TEs underexplored. By reinterpreting Hacking’s metaphor of performing a TE as acting a part in a play, I highlight three interrelated features of TEs’ participatory dimension: (i) their dual nature as both scripts and performances, (ii) the alternation between onlooker and participant stances, and (iii) the public status of immersion. I illustrate this proposal through Thomson’s <italic>Dying Violinist</italic> and Einstein’s <italic>Chasing the Light</italic>, showing how immersive features can guide ethical judgement and expose theoretical tensions. Finally, I argue that immersion is itself open to dialectical contestation: critics can redirect or dampen a TE’s immersive features in order to reshape its argumentative force. On this view, the epistemic value of immersive participation lies not in the accuracy of the experience it recreates, but in its capacity to open a shared space of contestation in which the strengths and limitations of TEs can be collectively tested.","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148286287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marija Brajdić Vuković, Ivan Tranfić, Pavel Gregorić
{"title":"Methods and values revisited: Responsibility and methodological orientations in the social sciences","authors":"Marija Brajdić Vuković, Ivan Tranfić, Pavel Gregorić","doi":"10.1007/s13194-026-00743-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00743-y","url":null,"abstract":"Philosophical debates on science and values increasingly emphasize that methods and concepts are not only shaped by values but also promote them through routine scientific practice. Building on Ratti and Russo’s bidirectional model, and on recent discussions of responsibility in science, we examine how methodological orientations function as practices that bear values within the social sciences. Drawing on qualitative data from an online research protocol with Croatian social scientists, we identify three patterned epistemic orientations and analyse how researchers reason about normative dilemmas across vignette scenarios. The findings show that methodological orientations are experienced not as neutral tools but as frameworks intertwined with responsibility, legitimacy, and professional identity. We argue that these orientations have a dual normative role: they are value-expressive, articulating researchers’ commitments, and value-generative, reinforcing institutional logics and social consequences beyond individual intention. By grounding the value-promotion thesis in empirical material, the paper proposes that reflexive awareness of both dimensions is a key component of responsible social scientific practice and highlights the epistemic and democratic significance of methodological pluralism.","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148289715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"What is an engineering model? philosophical arguments and counterarguments on why machine learning models belong in engineering","authors":"Mohannad Zeyad Naser","doi":"10.1007/s13194-026-00752-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00752-x","url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the ontological and epistemological status of engineering models to make explicit the often implicit criteria that govern model acceptance and evaluate whether machine learning (ML) models satisfy these criteria. We argue that the distinction engineers draw between \"physics-based\" and \"data-driven\" models lacks ontological robustness, and we propose a definition that identifies decision support and evidence of performance as constitutive requirements, while remaining neutral with respect to derivational history and mathematical form. From this foundation, three claims arise. First, ontologically, engineering models are structured compressions of regularities that differ in their degree of theoretical content but not in kind. Second, epistemologically, the warrant for trusting a model in engineering practice derives from calibration, validation, and domain-appropriate uncertainty quantification, and these criteria apply equally to ML models and traditional models. Third, pragmatically, model equivalence should be defined operationally in terms of decision support under reliability constraints rather than physical interpretability. The resistance to ML models in traditional engineering disciplines, thus, may reflect not only philosophical concerns but also an attachment to a conception of proper engineering that ML appears to challenge. This paper concludes that ML models represent not a departure from the engineering modeling tradition but its logical completion, insofar as they make explicit the empiricism that was always implicit in code equations, constitutive laws, and phenomenological models.","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148289727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to: Science advice for policy: enhancing the legitimacy of non-epistemic value judgments through proportionality analysis","authors":"Silje Langvatn,Cathrine Holst","doi":"10.1007/s13194-026-00745-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00745-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149124341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The relevance principle from a causal perspective","authors":"Alexander Gebharter, Michał Sikorski","doi":"10.1007/s13194-026-00733-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00733-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147756069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The fate of particles in finite-temperature quantum field theory","authors":"Adam Koberinski","doi":"10.1007/s13194-026-00742-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00742-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"143 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147733594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Stochastic supervenience: a conservative extension of classical deterministic supervenience","authors":"Youheng Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s13194-026-00739-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00739-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147619694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Pursuitworthiness of breakthrough experiments: transforming emerging intuitions into established norms","authors":"Szymon Miłkoś","doi":"10.1007/s13194-026-00738-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00738-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147619691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}