Jing Xu, Linzhuo Wang, Helen Lingard, Xiaodong Li, Christine Unterhitzenberger
{"title":"Wellbeing in and through projects: A multilevel view","authors":"Jing Xu, Linzhuo Wang, Helen Lingard, Xiaodong Li, Christine Unterhitzenberger","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102923","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102923","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"44 7","pages":"Article 102923"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149212348","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Toward mindful project organizing: Tim Vogus on reliability, adaptation, and collective mindfulness","authors":"Timothy J. Vogus, Carole Daniel, Ravi S. Kudesia","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102903","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102903","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This insight interview article engages Tim Vogus, Professor at Vanderbilt University and a leading scholar of mindful organizing and high reliability, in a dialogue on how mindfulness research may inform project organizing and project management scholarship. The interview explores five interconnected topics related to project organizing: mindful organizing in temporary, dynamic, and multi-organizational project settings; the strategic importance of attention to weak signals and everyday operational details; the interplay between individual mindfulness and collective mindful organizing in project teams; mindfulness, innovation, flexibility, and adaptation in projects; and promising future research directions at the intersection of mindfulness and project organizing. Vogus argues that project contexts provide a fertile setting for advancing theorizing on mindful organizing, particularly regarding the management of the unexpected, the sequencing of collective mindfulness processes, and the reciprocal dynamics between individual and collective forms of mindfulness. The interview also advances emerging debates raised in prior work by challenging assumptions regarding the limitations of mindful organizing in less regulated project settings and emphasizing the complementarity between individual mindfulness and collective mindful organizing. The interview highlights opportunities for longitudinal, multilevel, and practice-oriented research that can enrich understanding of project organizing under uncertainty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"44 6","pages":"Article 102903"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148854660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Paying attention to mindfulness in projects: A canonical perspective","authors":"Ekaterina Anichenko, Julien Pollack, Lynn Crawford","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102905","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102905","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper proposes a right mindfulness (sammā sati) framework, drawn from a canonical account, as an integrative lens for mindfulness research in project management. Based on an integrative review of the extant literature, we argue that right mindfulness addresses recurring conceptual and methodological limitations of the two dominant traditions in the field — mindful attention and mindful conceptualising — and recovers the relational, intentional, and ethical dimensions of mindfulness that have been oscured by a predominantly instrumental framing of this concept. Our framework positions mindful attention as an enabler of mindful conceptualising and situates both within a wider web of path factors. Thus, this paper makes three contributions: it identifies recurring conceptual and methodological limitations in how mindfulness has been applied in project research; it introduces an integrative framework that specifies the relationship between the two dominant traditions and recovers the intentional, relational, and ethical dimensions of the construct; and it reconceptualises mindfulness in projects beyond its prevailing instrumental framing, positioning it as a practice through which the ends and legitimacy of projects remain open to scrutiny.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"44 6","pages":"Article 102905"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148958475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Resource competition and inter-project learning in megaproject ecologies","authors":"Lara Katharine Mottee, Jennifer Whyte","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102902","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102902","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While inter-project learning is important in infrastructure megaproject ecologies, concurrent projects compete for resources. Prior research highlights the benefits of inter-project learning but does not explain how competition for resources affects this learning. Drawing on a qualitative study, we explain how resource competition between projects limits learning in the Sydney megaproject ecology. We identify constraints arising from this competition, including workforce availability, professional expertise, and knowledge ownership. Our study reveals emerging practices to address resource competition through vertical experimentation with project sequencing and horizontal experimentation with ad hoc sharing. We contribute by theorising how shared dependence on scarce resources leads to competition between projects that constrains inter-project learning. Our theorising provides insights into enabling inter-project learning in project ecologies by identifying governance strategies to alleviate resource constraints and embed learning mechanisms. It suggests new directions for research on resource competition and inter-project learning in project ecologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"44 6","pages":"Article 102902"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148854661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Carole Daniel, Ute R. Hülsheger, Ravi S. Kudesia, Shankar Sankaran, Linzhuo Wang
{"title":"Mindfulness as a multilevel organizing capability in project management","authors":"Carole Daniel, Ute R. Hülsheger, Ravi S. Kudesia, Shankar Sankaran, Linzhuo Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102909","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102909","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In our introduction to this Special Issue on Mindfulness in Project Management, we emphasize the growing relevance of mindfulness for understanding how project actors navigate uncertainty, complexity, and the demands of temporary organizing. Our argument addresses the need to move beyond predominantly fragmented conceptualizations of mindfulness toward a more integrative understanding encompassing attentional awareness, adaptive cognition, collective organizing, metacognitive practice, and ethical reflexivity. As projects unfold under conditions of uncertainty, interdependence, and change, project actors must remain sufficiently attentive and adaptive while sustaining the reliability required for effective coordination and delivery. However, understanding how mindfulness can support this balance requires moving beyond its traditional framing as an individual capability or well-being intervention to consider how it may also become enacted through interactions, routines, and organizing practices across multiple levels. Against this backdrop, the focus of this Special Issue is on advancing theory and evidence regarding how mindfulness may contribute to project organizing under uncertainty. We summarize the contributions of the five research articles and one Insight interview that make up this Special Issue, highlighting how they progressively extend our understanding of mindfulness from individual functioning and adaptive cognition to team practices, multilevel processes, collective mindful organizing, and ethical reflexivity. In conclusion, we propose an updated research agenda and advance mindfulness as a multilevel organizing capability that may help project actors navigate the persistent tension between reliability and adaptability while fostering more attentive, reflexive, and humane forms of project organizing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"44 6","pages":"Article 102909"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148958507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Governance of disaster recovery programs: a longitudinal case study of the brumadinho dam disaster","authors":"Leandro Alves Patah, Marcia Magalhães da Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102904","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102904","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Disaster recovery programs pose significant governance challenges due to the combination of urgency, institutional complexity, and contested legitimacy. While prior research has examined program governance in complex settings, limited attention has been given to how governance and monitoring mechanisms are designed and adapt over time in disaster recovery contexts, particularly when legitimacy must be actively constructed. This paper addresses this gap through an in-depth longitudinal case study of the Brumadinho dam disaster recovery program in Brazil. The program, judicially mandated and involving almost 200 interrelated projects across 26 municipalities, is implemented by the organization responsible for the disaster and overseen by public authorities and an independent monitor. Drawing on documentary analysis, monitoring reports, and longitudinal observation, the study traces the evolution of governance and monitoring mechanisms across three phases: ex-ante evaluation and planning, delivery and monitoring, and ex-post evaluation and learning. The findings show that governance arrangements in disaster recovery programs evolve dynamically and require phase-contingent configurations that extend beyond traditional program management models. Governance mechanisms evolve across phases, with independent monitoring, adaptive coordination, and transparent evaluation functioning as mechanisms through which the program balances delivery, legitimacy, accountability, and resilience. This paper contributes to the program management literature by conceptualizing disaster recovery programs as adaptive governance arenas shaped by urgency and legitimacy deficits, and by reframing program monitoring as both an instrumental and a legitimacy-building mechanism. Beyond disaster recovery contexts, the study offers insights for the design of governance systems in large-scale programs operating under high uncertainty, institutional plurality, and intense public scrutiny.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"44 6","pages":"Article 102904"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148958474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Adapting the organizational structures of clients to deal with uncertainty in major infrastructure programs","authors":"Kaiwen Jiang, Yun Le, Juliano Denicol, Xian Zheng, Ruochen Liu, Xinyue Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102852","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102852","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Managing uncertainty poses a persistent challenge for clients delivering major infrastructure programs, characterized by their complexity and dynamic nature. This study explores how client leaders and managers adapt organizational structures to address evolving uncertainty across the program lifecycle. Based on a multi-case study with four airport programs in China, we identify four dominant perceived uncertainty characteristics—ambiguity, volatility, complexity, and criticality—that shift across program phases. This research reveals how these perceptions trigger shifts in program management strategies (target-oriented, change-oriented, integration-oriented, and risk-oriented), which guide two key patterns of organizational structure adaptation: centralization (centralizing or decentralizing decision-making) and departmentation (functionalizing or divisionalizing responsibilities). We present a framework that links managerial perception, strategy, and structure, offering new insights into uncertainty management and organizational adaptation in program management. Flexible governance frameworks should be designed, empowering the client organization to adapt its internal structure as it progresses through the program lifecycle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"44 5","pages":"Article 102852"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148542383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Future-making in the front-end of projects","authors":"Joseph Harrison, Jennifer Whyte","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102854","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102854","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Future-making scholarship frames the future as something iteratively constructed through practices of interpretation and negotiation. The project front-end literature, by contrast, is dominated by rationalist assumptions treating planning as a vehicle to enable ‘lock-in’ to preferred outcomes early in a project. To bring these literatures into dialogue, we theorize the project front-end as a space in which provisional representations of the future intersect with institutional demands for early commitments. Drawing on practice-based and pragmatist perspectives, we propose five strategies to mobilize insights on future-making as inquiry in the project front-end: (1) strategic timing, (2) staged sequencing, (3) potential abandonment, (4) design flexibility, and (5) participatory inclusion. We conclude this essay by outlining a research agenda to enable more inquiry-led planning in projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"44 5","pages":"Article 102854"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148542386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Systems integration for sustainability transitions: The case of grid-connected solar photovoltaic projects in Bangladesh","authors":"Shah Abdul Saadi, Andrew Davies","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102889","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102889","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While research shows that projects enable sustainability transitions, a major gap remains in understanding how new technologies, initiated through multiple projects, are integrated into incumbent sociotechnical systems to drive these transitions. This study examines the integration of variable renewable energy (VRE)-based power generation technologies into Bangladesh's electricity grid. We suggest that a lead systems integrator organisation in the owner-operator domain occupies a pivotal role in sustainability transition pathways through two distinct yet interconnected and mutually reinforcing processes of alteration and alignment. Systems integration alteration processes modify the technological, actor, and institutional dimensions of the incumbent electricity system, enabling the organisation and integration of multiple grid-connected solar photovoltaic (PV) projects over time across their system lifecycle. Systems integration alignment processes ensure the stable, reliable, and sustained integration of solar PV projects. We propose a Systems Integration for Transitions (SIT) framework to show how a lead organisation must dynamically balance the need for alteration processes that drive change in the existing system with alignment processes that prioritise stability and reliability. Together, these SIT processes support the integration of grid-connected solar PV projects in ways that reconfigure the electricity system towards sustainability transitions whilst maintaining stability and reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"44 5","pages":"Article 102889"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148542384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From AI to value: The role of sensemaking in project environments","authors":"Costanza Mariani","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102863","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102863","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence is currently adopted in project environments, promising enhanced prediction, efficiency, and decision-making. However, despite widespread adoption, its contribution to project value remains limited. This essay argues that the key challenge is not AI readiness, but the ability to transform AI-formed outputs into meaningful and actionable insights. Drawing on sensemaking theory, it introduces the concept of AI-enabled project sensemaking as the process through which project actors interpret, negotiate, and critically evaluate AI outputs in context. The essay develops a framework based on four interrelated capabilities - problem framing, meaning interpretation, collective alignment, and reflexive validation - and links them to the project value lifecycle, including value definition, delivery, capture, and safeguarding. The essay highlights a central paradox - AI as both a reducer of uncertainty and a generator of equivocality - showing that AI does not directly create value, but contributes to it through interpretive processes. This perspective reframes the role of AI in projects and outlines a research agenda focused on cognition, governance, and stakeholder dynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"44 5","pages":"Article 102863"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148542387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}