Knowledge governance mechanisms and regulatory focus effects on online collective knowledge sharing in project teams

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Jianyao Jia , Shan Jiang , Yuanyuan Zhang
{"title":"Knowledge governance mechanisms and regulatory focus effects on online collective knowledge sharing in project teams","authors":"Jianyao Jia ,&nbsp;Shan Jiang ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2025.102748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In today’s mobile internet era, online knowledge sharing has become increasingly prevalent within project teams. However, fostering online knowledge sharing in practice presents significant challenges, and the underlying psychological mechanisms, particularly concerning online collective knowledge sharing, remain incompletely understood. Given that online collective knowledge sharing occurs within public or collective spheres, a primary goal becomes improving the collective good and achieving shared goals. Consequently, online collective knowledge sharing is conceptualized as a process through which team members pursue both organizational and individually-assigned knowledge goals, which are specified by knowledge governance mechanisms. To explain the psychological mechanism involved in reducing goal discrepancies, regulatory focus theory is employed. Utilizing a dataset of 208 project team members, the study examines the proposed hypotheses and finds that prevention focus, rather than promotion focus, directly contributes to online collective knowledge sharing. Furthermore, prevention focus mediates the relationship between knowledge governance mechanisms and online collective knowledge sharing, while promotion focus strengthens the positive association between prevention focus and knowledge sharing. By revealing these complex dynamics, this study contributes to both project management and knowledge management literature. Moreover, it provides practical insights for knowledge management practices within today’s pervasive online environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"43 6","pages":"Article 102748"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786325000742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In today’s mobile internet era, online knowledge sharing has become increasingly prevalent within project teams. However, fostering online knowledge sharing in practice presents significant challenges, and the underlying psychological mechanisms, particularly concerning online collective knowledge sharing, remain incompletely understood. Given that online collective knowledge sharing occurs within public or collective spheres, a primary goal becomes improving the collective good and achieving shared goals. Consequently, online collective knowledge sharing is conceptualized as a process through which team members pursue both organizational and individually-assigned knowledge goals, which are specified by knowledge governance mechanisms. To explain the psychological mechanism involved in reducing goal discrepancies, regulatory focus theory is employed. Utilizing a dataset of 208 project team members, the study examines the proposed hypotheses and finds that prevention focus, rather than promotion focus, directly contributes to online collective knowledge sharing. Furthermore, prevention focus mediates the relationship between knowledge governance mechanisms and online collective knowledge sharing, while promotion focus strengthens the positive association between prevention focus and knowledge sharing. By revealing these complex dynamics, this study contributes to both project management and knowledge management literature. Moreover, it provides practical insights for knowledge management practices within today’s pervasive online environments.
知识治理机制和监管焦点对项目团队在线集体知识共享的影响
在今天的移动互联网时代,在线知识共享在项目团队中变得越来越普遍。然而,在实践中促进在线知识共享面临着重大挑战,潜在的心理机制,特别是关于在线集体知识共享的心理机制,仍然不完全清楚。鉴于在线集体知识共享发生在公共或集体领域,主要目标变成了改善集体利益和实现共同目标。因此,在线集体知识共享被概念化为团队成员追求组织和个人指定的知识目标的过程,这些目标是由知识治理机制指定的。为了解释减少目标差异的心理机制,运用了调节焦点理论。利用208个项目团队成员的数据集,该研究检验了提出的假设,发现以预防为重点,而不是以促进为重点,直接有助于在线集体知识共享。预防焦点在知识治理机制与网络集体知识共享的关系中起中介作用,而促进焦点在预防焦点与知识共享的正相关关系中起强化作用。通过揭示这些复杂的动态,本研究对项目管理和知识管理的文献都有所贡献。此外,它还为当今无处不在的在线环境中的知识管理实践提供了实用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Project Management is recognized as a premier publication in the field of project management and organization studies. Our main objective is to contribute to the advancement of project management and project organizing through the publication of groundbreaking research. We are dedicated to presenting fresh insights and new knowledge in various domains, including project management, program management, portfolio management, project-oriented organizations, project networks, and project-oriented societies. We actively encourage submissions that explore project management and organizing from the perspectives of organizational behavior, strategy, supply chain management, technology, change management, innovation, and sustainability. By publishing high-quality research articles and reviews, we strive to revolutionize the academic landscape and propel the field of project management forward. We invite researchers, scholars, and practitioners to contribute to our journal and be a part of the progressive development in this exciting field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信