Cognitive Therapy and Research最新文献_第5页

A Novel Experimental Approach to Identifying the Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Loneliness 确定孤独感认知机制的新实验方法

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Cognitive Therapy and Research Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1007/s10608-024-10494-w

Dino Zagic, Ronald M. Rapee, Viviana M. Wuthrich

{"title":"A Novel Experimental Approach to Identifying the Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Loneliness","authors":"Dino Zagic, Ronald M. Rapee, Viviana M. Wuthrich","doi":"10.1007/s10608-024-10494-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10494-w","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Current models of loneliness emphasise the role of maladaptive cognitions in causing and/or maintaining loneliness. However, standardised paradigms to experimentally examine the role of maladaptive cognition in loneliness are lacking, making it difficult to establish causality. This paper tested a mock online chat paradigm designed to induce changes in negative affect (loneliness, depression, and anxiety), and strength of belief in lonely thoughts, by manipulating comparative and normative fit.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Participants (<i>N</i> = 59) were randomised into either the loneliness arm (i.e., loneliness induction chat followed by a social connectedness induction chat), or the social connectedness arm (i.e., two separate social connectedness induction chats), and subsequently completed outcome measures.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The experimental paradigm significantly and specifically increased lonely affect; however, this was associated with non-significant changes in strength of belief in lonely thoughts. The social connectedness induction chat led to significant reductions in broad negative affect for both groups, with these effects accruing across chats for participants in the social connectedness arm.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Experimentally manipulating comparative and normative fit to either emphasise differences or similarities between an individual and group members is an effective paradigm for increasing lonely affect or decreasing general negative affect, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141168676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

A Personalised Approach to Identifying Important Determinants of Well-being 确定福祉重要决定因素的个性化方法

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Cognitive Therapy and Research Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI: 10.1007/s10608-024-10486-w

Joseph Ciarrochi, Baljinder Sahdra, Steven C. Hayes, Stefan G. Hofmann, Brandon Sanford, Cory Stanton, Keong Yap, Madeleine I. Fraser, Kathleen Gates, Andrew T. Gloster

{"title":"A Personalised Approach to Identifying Important Determinants of Well-being","authors":"Joseph Ciarrochi, Baljinder Sahdra, Steven C. Hayes, Stefan G. Hofmann, Brandon Sanford, Cory Stanton, Keong Yap, Madeleine I. Fraser, Kathleen Gates, Andrew T. Gloster","doi":"10.1007/s10608-024-10486-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10486-w","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To develop effective and personalized interventions, it is essential to identify the most critical processes or psychological drivers that impact an individual’s well-being. Some processes may be universally beneficial to well-being across many contexts and people, while others may only be beneficial to certain individuals in specific contexts.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Method</h3><p>We conducted three intensive daily diary studies, each with more than 50 within-person measurement occasions, across three data sets (n1 = 44; n2 = 37; n3 = 141). We aimed to investigate individual differences in the strength of within-person associations between three distinct process measures and a variety of outcomes. We utilized a unique idiographic algorithm, known as i-ARIMAX (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average), to determine the strength of the relationship (Beta) between each process and outcome within individuals (“i”). All of the computed betas were then subjected to meta-analyses, with individuals treated as the “study”.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The results revealed that the process-outcome links varied significantly between individuals, surpassing the homogeneity typically seen in meta-analyses of studies. Although several processes showed group-level effects, no process was found to be universally beneficial when considered individually. For instance, processes involving social behavior, like being assertive, did not demonstrate any group-level links to loneliness but still had significant individual-level effects that varied from positive to negative.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Discussion</h3><p>Using i-ARIMAX might help reduce the number of candidate variables for complex within-person analyses. Additionally, the size and pattern of i-ARIMAX betas could prove useful in guiding personalized interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141173160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Unscrambling the Dynamics of Danger: Scientific Foundations and Evidence for the Looming Vulnerability Model and Looming Cognitive Style in Anxiety 解密危险动力学：焦虑症中隐约可见的脆弱性模型和隐约可见的认知风格的科学基础和证据

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Cognitive Therapy and Research Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI: 10.1007/s10608-024-10481-1

John H. Riskind

引用次数: 0

Hitting the Rewind Button: Imagining Analogue Trauma Memories in Reverse Reduces Distressing Intrusions 按下倒带按钮反向想象模拟创伤记忆可减少令人不安的干扰

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Cognitive Therapy and Research Pub Date : 2024-05-24 DOI: 10.1007/s10608-024-10488-8

J. Rattel, Sarah K. Danböck, Stephan F. Miedl, M. Liedlgruber, Frank H Wilhelm

引用次数: 0

A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Stepped Care Cognitive-behavioral Therapy for Internalizing Distress in Adults 阶梯护理认知行为疗法治疗成人内化困扰的实用随机对照试验

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Cognitive Therapy and Research Pub Date : 2024-05-23 DOI: 10.1007/s10608-024-10489-7

L. Lorenzo-Luaces, Clare Dierckman, Colton Lind, Allison Peipert, Robinson De Jesús-Romero, J. Buss, Israel Ramirez, Isabella Starvaggi, Sydney Adams, Jacqueline Howard, Robert E. Fite

引用次数: 0

The Interactive Effects of Rejection and Rumination on Diurnal Cortisol among Adolescent Girls: A Preliminary Daily Diary Study 拒绝和胡思乱想对少女昼间皮质醇的交互影响：每日日记初步研究

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Cognitive Therapy and Research Pub Date : 2024-05-22 DOI: 10.1007/s10608-024-10492-y

Chrystal Vergara-Lopez, Matthew D. Scalco, A. Gaffey, Brie M. Reid, M. Bublitz, Sharon Y. Lee, Andrea Gomez, Nadia Mercado, Laura R Stroud

引用次数: 0

Intolerance of Uncertainty is Associated with Heightened Arousal During Extinction Learning and Retention: Preliminary Evidence from a Clinical Sample with Anxiety and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders 对不确定性的不容忍与消退学习和保持过程中的高度唤醒有关：来自焦虑症和强迫症临床样本的初步证据

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Cognitive Therapy and Research Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI: 10.1007/s10608-024-10491-z

Jayne Morriss, Claudia Rodriguez-Sobstel, Shari A. Steinman

引用次数: 0

What Are You Ruminating About? The Development and Validation of a Content-Dependent Measure of Rumination 你在反刍什么？反刍内容依赖性测量方法的开发与验证

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Cognitive Therapy and Research Pub Date : 2024-05-12 DOI: 10.1007/s10608-024-10482-0

Christopher Marcin Kowalski, Donald H. Saklofske, Julie Aitken Schermer

{"title":"What Are You Ruminating About? The Development and Validation of a Content-Dependent Measure of Rumination","authors":"Christopher Marcin Kowalski, Donald H. Saklofske, Julie Aitken Schermer","doi":"10.1007/s10608-024-10482-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10482-0","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Existing measures of rumination assess ruminative thought without reference to the content of ruminations. The present studies describe the construction and validation of the Rumination Domains Questionnaire, a new measure of rumination which considers the domain specificity of ruminative thought.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A theoretical definition of rumination and domains of life were formulated through a literature review. Items were based on these domains, clinical/counselling case studies, and expert feedback. In Study 1, 106 preliminary items were reduced to 60 items through empirical analyses. In Study 2, the content and structural validity were assessed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Items were retained based on empirical criteria and the final scale demonstrated acceptable fit for both a 10-factor model and a hierarchical model. Content validity and criterion validity were supported, and both 10-factor and hierarchical models demonstrated acceptable fit.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Overall, we present strong evidence supporting the validity of the RDQ.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140936064","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Intergenerational Transmission of Social Anxiety: The Role of Parents’ Fear of Negative Child Evaluation and Their Self-Referent and Child-Referent Interpretation Biases 社交焦虑的代际传递：父母对子女负面评价的恐惧及其自我参照和子女参照解释偏差的作用

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Cognitive Therapy and Research Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1007/s10608-024-10490-0

Melis Dülger, Bram Van Bockstaele, Mirjana Majdandžić, Wieke de Vente

{"title":"Intergenerational Transmission of Social Anxiety: The Role of Parents’ Fear of Negative Child Evaluation and Their Self-Referent and Child-Referent Interpretation Biases","authors":"Melis Dülger, Bram Van Bockstaele, Mirjana Majdandžić, Wieke de Vente","doi":"10.1007/s10608-024-10490-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10490-0","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Parents’ fear of negative evaluation (FNE), fear of negative child evaluation (FNCE; parents’ fear that their child is evaluated negatively by others), and self- and child-referent negative interpretation biases have been proposed to play a role in the intergenerational transmission of social anxiety. In this cross-sectional study, we tested whether parents’ self-reported FNE and self-referent interpretation bias, as well as their FNCE and child-referent interpretation bias, statistically mediated the relationship between parent social anxiety and parent-reported child social anxiety.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A total of 179 parents of 13–16-year-old adolescents completed questionnaires concerning own social anxiety, their FNE, and FNCE and their child’s social anxiety. Parents’ self- and child-referent interpretation biases were measured using scenario completion and memory recognition tasks.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Parents’ FNCE partially statistically mediated the relationship between parent and child social anxiety. Parents’ FNE and their self- and child-referent interpretation biases did, however, not statistically mediate this relationship.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Parents’ FNCE does, but their FNE and self- and child-referent interpretation biases do not seem to play a role in the intergenerational transmission of social anxiety. Hence, parents’ FNCE might be a promising target for clinical practice while designing therapies and interventions concerning child social anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140936358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

How Are You Feeling Today? Dynamic and Static Indices of Daily Affect Predict Psychological Adjustment One Year Later in a Multi-cohort, Longitudinal Investigation 你今天感觉如何？在一项多队列纵向调查中，日常情绪的动态和静态指数可预测一年后的心理适应情况

IF 2.8 3区心理学

Cognitive Therapy and Research Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI: 10.1007/s10608-024-10484-y

Benjamin J. Mitchell, Brittany Baugher, Emily Gawlik, Julia Richmond, Pooja G. Sidney, Jennifer M. Taber, Clarissa A. Thompson, Karin G. Coifman

{"title":"How Are You Feeling Today? Dynamic and Static Indices of Daily Affect Predict Psychological Adjustment One Year Later in a Multi-cohort, Longitudinal Investigation","authors":"Benjamin J. Mitchell, Brittany Baugher, Emily Gawlik, Julia Richmond, Pooja G. Sidney, Jennifer M. Taber, Clarissa A. Thompson, Karin G. Coifman","doi":"10.1007/s10608-024-10484-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10484-y","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Dominant psychotherapies target how individuals experience and understand their daily emotion. Therefore, research examining how daily emotions influence long-term mental health outcomes may help inform treatment development.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This investigation applied a multi-cohort (<i>n</i> = 378; <i>n</i> = 460), longitudinal design to test how reports of daily emotion predict psychological symptoms, loneliness, and wellbeing one-year later. Dynamic indices (polarity, inertia) reflecting “how” emotional experiences are conceptualized moment-to-moment and static indices (person-mean, standard deviation) of emotion were extracted from 10 daily reports. Each index was modelled individually, in concert with others, and in relation to a key dispositional factor in symptom development: trait anxiety.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Dynamic indices predicted outcomes one-year later, but only the effect of positive emotional inertia remained significant after accounting for mean intensity of affect. Daily reports of emotion also predicted small but significant variance in outcomes beyond trait anxiety.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Results highlight the role of daily subjective experiences of emotion in long-term mental health outcomes and reinforce their importance as targets for treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140838496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0