{"title":"The Price of Responsiveness: Examining the Impact of Competition and Earmarked Funding on Humanitarian Aid Effectiveness","authors":"Cecilia Corsini,Mirko Heinzel,Bernhard Reinsberg","doi":"10.1093/isq/sqag070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag070","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The humanitarian sector is a crowded policy space where humanitarian international organizations (HIOs) compete for limited resources. While existing research examines why HIOs compete or how competition affects their survival, the impact on organizational performance remains underexplored. This article assesses how competition for resources, within a system dominated by earmarked funding, affects the ability of HIOs to deliver humanitarian responses. Using a large-N analysis of 16 UN HIOs across 2,238 sudden-onset disasters (2000–2020), we find that HIOs with a larger proportion of earmarked funding demonstrate greater responsiveness. However, this advantage is fragile. As the number of competing agencies increases, these heavily earmarked organizations suffer the most significant performance declines. Performance losses are particularly acute for HIOs with coordination mandates, suggesting that earmarking stretches organizational capacity to a breaking point. Conversely, HIOs that have developed internal rapid-response mechanisms are better equipped to mitigate the adverse effects of competition. Qualitative interviews with stakeholders suggest that intense competition drives HIOs to prioritize fundraising for survival over coordination, leading to “mission creep” as agencies align with donor priorities rather than actual needs. This study contributes to debates on the trade-offs between competition and coordination, offering new insights into how resourcing shapes international organizations performance.","PeriodicalId":48313,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Quarterly","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148898977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Conflict Salience and Political Demobilization: How Intrastate Violence Shapes Political Behavior","authors":"Kirssa Cline Ryckman","doi":"10.1093/isq/sqag069","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag069","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract To what extent do civilians identify ongoing intrastate violence as the most important issue facing their country, and how do those perceptions shape their propensity to engage politically, from discussing politics to contacting officials or voting? To address these questions, I start by examining whether individuals identify intrastate violence as the most important problem facing their country, arguing that conflict salience is influenced by heightened perceptions of insecurity. Partly as a result, I expect that individuals who view intrastate conflict as salient will be less likely to engage in political participation, as insecurity is linked with dispiriting emotions, including powerlessness, pessimism, and fear, driving down engagement. Using Afrobarometer data, findings are supportive of the expectations. This suggests that the way in which conflict is processed, through a lens of insecurity, increases perceptions of salience and decreases political participation.","PeriodicalId":48313,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Quarterly","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148898980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Playing Hard to Get: Strategic Signaling in Aid Bargaining","authors":"Anthony Luongo","doi":"10.1093/isq/sqag065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag065","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Foreign aid is a political exchange between a donor and a target. Existing literature focuses primarily on the strategic actions of donors, but less is known about how targets advance their interests. This article explores the role of aid-receiving states as strategic actors who can extract concessions from donors. I model the aid exchange using a costly signaling model in which targets send a (potentially misleading) signal of their policy preferences before the donor makes an aid offer. In equilibrium, when the cost of sending a misleading signal is sufficiently low, targets who are aligned with a donor on policy sometimes lie about their alignment, which yields them aid that they would not have received otherwise. Empirically, I show that strategic nonresponse in the UN General Assembly—a low-cost signal of nonalignment—is correlated with higher future aid inflows.","PeriodicalId":48313,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Quarterly","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148898979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"What Does Not Kill Me Makes Me Stronger: How Violations Can Strengthen International Norms","authors":"Joseph O’Mahoney","doi":"10.1093/isq/sqag060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag060","url":null,"abstract":"Abstracts When India’s 1974 nuclear test violated the nonproliferation norm represented by the new Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), observers feared the norm was finished. And yet, after the test, the norm grew stronger. More states ratified the treaty, more international institutions were created by nuclear supplier states to restrict nuclear exports, more safeguards were required on the whole nuclear fuel cycle, and suppliers agreed not to export plutonium reprocessing technology. How did this norm violation produce a stronger norm? This paper shows that unexpected norm violations can galvanize actors who value the norm through three mechanisms: making the norm issue internationally salient and coordinating collective attention; radically increasing the perception of the threat of future norm violations; and making actors conceptually reconstruct what the problem of violation is and how to address it. Drawing on original archival evidence from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, and time-series newspaper data across all three countries, the paper shows how India’s test produced fear of more states acquiring a nuclear explosive capability, more attention in the form of newspaper articles, legislation on nuclear exports, and nonproliferation policy reviews, and widened the scope of the norm to include stricter controls on enrichment and reprocessing technology. The paper contributes a microfoundational account of how violations can overcome collective action barriers, and identifies unexpectedness as a variable explaining when norm violations strengthen rather than erode international norms.","PeriodicalId":48313,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Quarterly","volume":"155 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148898978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"How Border Disputes Influence Disaster Response","authors":"Adam Lappe,Sara McLaughlin Mitchell,Elise Pizzi","doi":"10.1093/isq/sqag059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag059","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examines how governments, international actors (states and international organizations), and non-state actors (non-governmental organizations) respond to disasters, focusing on whether response is distinct in border areas, in areas with ongoing territorial claims, and in areas with settled borders. The theory considers the role of state capacity and strategic importance of geographic areas to help understand whether and how government and other actors respond to disasters. Using new quantitative data on disaster response policies in Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru (1900–2020) at the administrative 1 level (N = 3,609), panel logit analyses show that territorial disputes significantly increase disaster response by security and international actors, and that disasters near international borders increase actors’ responsiveness, consistent with the strategic logic. In contrast, once a territorial claim is resolved, many actors (military, civil defense, leaders, IOs, and other states) are significantly less likely to offer disaster aid, reflecting the diminished strategic importance of the area. State capacity has a weaker effect on disaster response, although civil defense responds more often in more populated areas, and areas farther from the capital city receive less assistance from the military, civil defense, leaders, other states, and IOs. The findings demonstrate that geography and interstate relations influence disaster responses and that peaceful settlement of territorial disputes may paradoxically reduce disaster assistance.","PeriodicalId":48313,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Quarterly","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148898992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Trust or Fortify? Border Walls in International Relations","authors":"Michael R Kenwick,Gino Pauselli,Beth A Simmons","doi":"10.1093/isq/sqag062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag062","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Much of the literature on border governance addresses the puzzle of border hardening by issue area: border fortifications are said to primarily be motivated by illicit trade, or used to combat transnational terrorism, or built to stop transnational migration. These approaches raise puzzles of their own, however. Why are strategies like walling preferred over other strategies of border governance despite the lack of clear evidence about their efficacy? We propose a relational rather than an issue-centric approach. Two aspects of interstate relations influence border fortification: (1) neighboring states’ degree of shared trust and (2) a neighbor’s relative capacity to participate in border management. Both predict whether as well as where walls are built. We demonstrate this using an innovative measure of bilateral trust. We also introduce a new global geolocated dataset of border walls and wall segments between 1990 and 2020. We show that spatial choices help to reveal why unilateral border measures, epitomized by walls and fences, are taken. The main contribution of this paper is to highlight the importance of international relationships, and especially trust, for unilateral border hardening decisions.","PeriodicalId":48313,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Quarterly","volume":"385 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148923022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Globalization and Political Protests: The Role of Imported Movies","authors":"Lu Sun, Quan Li","doi":"10.1093/isq/sqag016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag016","url":null,"abstract":"We study how political protest movies produced by and imported from democratic countries influence anti-government demonstrations in autocratic countries. We argue that public consumption of imported protest movies increases anti-government demonstrations by inducing imitation or copycat behaviors, facilitating coordination and social networking, and imparting democratic values. To test our argument, we compile and analyze a novel dataset on political protest movies from 2000 to 2018. We find that widely watched protest movies have a significant positive impact on anti-government demonstrations. Our instrumental variable estimation, along with a battery of placebo tests, provides further empirical support. Neither little-watched protest movies nor widely watched family romance movies affect protests, and widely watched imported protest movies do not impact prior political protests in autocracies or subsequent political protests in democracies. Our research contributes to the scholarship on the effects of globalization, foreign media, and international service trade, highlighting the role of foreign culture in shaping political outcomes.","PeriodicalId":48313,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Quarterly","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147501991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Migration, Remittances, and Petty Corruption in Africa","authors":"Alex Yeandle, David Doyle","doi":"10.1093/isq/sqag015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag015","url":null,"abstract":"Driven by rising access to mobile money and growing diaspora communities, remittances to African countries have reached record highs. Yet while scholars have connected aggregate remittance flows to macro-level political change, we know little about how these transfers shape individual-level dynamics among recipients. Since private sector markets are weak in many parts of Africa, we argue that recipients cannot easily substitute government services and so use their outside income to seek preferential access to them instead. This increases exposure to bribes from public officials, driving broader perceptions of corruption and reducing willingness to pay tax. We present evidence from survey data across the African continent, a pre-registered list experiment in Ghana, and in-depth focus group discussions with recipients. We also introduce novel measures of remittances that capture distinct dimensions of receipt and compare dynamics across them. The paper contributes to the literature on remittances and political behavior, alongside ongoing policy debates about cash transfers, corruption, and institutional development.","PeriodicalId":48313,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Quarterly","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147489361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From Bullets to Balance Sheets: How Military Involvement in the Economy Shapes Leader Survival","authors":"Roya Izadi","doi":"10.1093/isq/sqaf082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaf082","url":null,"abstract":"From producing consumer goods to managing clubs, banks, and other for-profit firms, many militaries generate revenues that are not part of the military budget and are far removed from the realm of military affairs, and have adverse consequences for societies. Despite their significance, causes and consequences of such activities are largely unexplored. This article investigates the impact of military economic activities on propensity for coups. It argues that as the military expands its role in the economy, it gains both the incentives and opportunities to stage coups. However, this effect varies by rank. Military-run enterprises function as a double-edged sword: while they provide rent-seeking opportunities that reduce the likelihood of rebellion among mid- and low-ranking officers, they also embolden senior officers, for whom economic control becomes a political stake. Leaders may use economic privileges to co-opt mid and lower ranking officers, but as military builds more economic capital, senior officers become less dependent on civilian leadership and more likely to stage coups. Using an original dataset of over 2,800 economic enterprises owned/run by militaries for all countries from 1950 to 2020, I show that coup risk significantly increases as military economic involvement increases, and such coups are primarily led by senior officers.","PeriodicalId":48313,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Quarterly","volume":"147 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145532015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Home Field Advantage: How Developer Identity Shapes Public Opinion about Energy Projects in Major Emerging Economies","authors":"Meir Alkon, Jennifer Hadden","doi":"10.1093/isq/sqaf078","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaf078","url":null,"abstract":"Building new energy infrastructure in emerging economies is a key pillar of global sustainable development, with the current project pipeline encompassing both foreign and domestic-led projects. But despite widespread need, energy projects are frequently criticized and opposed by citizens. Drawing on a conjoint experiment fielded in three major emerging economies, we examine the behavioral foundations of the political process underlying energy infrastructure development and siting. This paper asks: how does the identity of the developer affect public opinion regarding energy infrastructure projects? We find that respondents strongly prefer domestic to foreign developers and express lower political support for politicians who bring in foreign-developed projects. Using statistical analyses and qualitative interviews, we establish the importance of concerns including pollution, employment, and project quality. These findings have implications for understanding public opposition to energy infrastructure as well as the role of international investment in accelerating the global green energy transition.","PeriodicalId":48313,"journal":{"name":"International Studies Quarterly","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145492406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}