Review of General Psychology最新文献_第7页

The Role of the Family for Racism and Xenophobia in Childhood and Adolescence 家庭在儿童和青少年时期种族主义和仇外心理中的作用

IF 4.2 2区心理学

Review of General Psychology Pub Date : 2021-12-06 DOI: 10.1177/10892680211056320

Tuğçe Aral, Linda P. Juang, Miriam Schwarzenthal, Deborah Rivas‐Drake

{"title":"The Role of the Family for Racism and Xenophobia in Childhood and Adolescence","authors":"Tuğçe Aral, Linda P. Juang, Miriam Schwarzenthal, Deborah Rivas‐Drake","doi":"10.1177/10892680211056320","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211056320","url":null,"abstract":"Racism and xenophobia are not just the problems of the adult world. As systems of beliefs, practices, and policies, racism and xenophobia influence children’s perceptions and experiences at early ages. Because families can be significant sources of information regarding race and ethnicity, we focus on the family to understand the broader context of racism and xenophobia in childhood and adolescence. In this paper, we first provide an overview of research conducted among BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color) and ethnic/religious minority families that has focused on family ethnic–racial socialization to support children and adolescents’ capabilities for resisting racism and xenophobia. We then review research conducted among white and ethnic/religious majority families that has mainly taken an intergroup relations perspective and has examined associations between parents’ and children’s ethnic–racial attitudes, biases, and prejudice. Finally, we discuss the role of family for racism and xenophobia through the lens of family ethnic–racial socialization and intergroup relations perspectives, highlight areas that are currently understudied, and offer recommendations concerning future research directions.","PeriodicalId":48306,"journal":{"name":"Review of General Psychology","volume":"26 1","pages":"327 - 341"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43571423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Back to the Source: Moving Upstream in the Curricular Rivers of Coloniality 回到源头:在殖民主义的课程河流中逆流而上

IF 4.2 2区心理学

Review of General Psychology Pub Date : 2021-10-21 DOI: 10.1177/10892680211046509

S. James, Helen Lorenz

引用次数: 2

General Psychology Otherwise: A Decolonial Articulation 普通心理学:一种非殖民化的表达

IF 4.2 2区心理学

Review of General Psychology Pub Date : 2021-10-18 DOI: 10.1177/10892680211048177

Decolonial Psychology Editorial Collective

引用次数: 1

Understanding Intergroup Relations in Childhood and Adolescence 理解儿童和青少年群体间关系

IF 4.2 2区心理学

Review of General Psychology Pub Date : 2021-10-11 DOI: 10.1177/10892680211050016

M. Verkuyten

引用次数: 3

How to True Psychology’s Objects 如何真实心理学的对象

IF 4.2 2区心理学

Review of General Psychology Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI: 10.1177/10892680211046518

J. Morawski

{"title":"How to True Psychology’s Objects","authors":"J. Morawski","doi":"10.1177/10892680211046518","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211046518","url":null,"abstract":"Psychology’s current crisis attends most visibly to perceived problems with statistical models, methods, publication practices, and career incentives. Rarely is close attention given to the objects of inquiry—to ontological matters—yet the crisis-related literature does features statements about the nature of psychology’s objects. Close analysis of the ontological claims reveals discrepant understandings: some researchers assume objects to be stable and singular while others posit them to be dynamic and complex. Nevertheless, both views presume the objects under scrutiny to be real. The analysis also finds each of these ontological claims to be associated not only with particular method prescriptions but also with distinct notions of the scientific self. Though both take the scientific self to be objective, one figures the scientist as not always a rational actor and, therefore, requiring some behavior regulation, while the other sees the scientist as largely capable of self-governing sustained through painstakingly acquired expertise and self-control. The fate of these prevalent assemblages of object, method, and scientific self remains to be determined, yet as conditions of possibility they portend quite different futures. Following description of the assemblages, the article ventures a futuristic portrayal of the scientific practices they each might engender.","PeriodicalId":48306,"journal":{"name":"Review of General Psychology","volume":"26 1","pages":"157 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46728506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Coloniality and Psychology: From Silencing to Re-Centering Marginalized Voices in Postcolonial Times 殖民与心理:从沉默到后殖民时代边缘化声音的重新聚焦

IF 4.2 2区心理学

Review of General Psychology Pub Date : 2021-09-27 DOI: 10.1177/10892680211046507

S. Bhatia, K. R. Priya

{"title":"Coloniality and Psychology: From Silencing to Re-Centering Marginalized Voices in Postcolonial Times","authors":"S. Bhatia, K. R. Priya","doi":"10.1177/10892680211046507","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211046507","url":null,"abstract":"We adopt a decolonizing framework in this article to examine how legacies of colonialism and coloniality continue to manifest in Euro-American psychology. The population of India is now over 1.2 billion people with over 356 million youth they make up the world’s largest youth population, but their stories remain largely invisible in Euro-American psychology. For this article, we draw on a growing body of research by decolonial theorists and our ethnographic research. We argue that Euro-American psychological science now reworks the old forms of imperialism and domination in neoliberal contexts of globalization. In particular, we analyze (a) how mainstream psychological knowledge of “culture” and “diversity” have reinforced a neoliberal self in postcolonial India; (b) the varied ways in which identities, values, and mental health experiences of marginalized communities have been silenced and ignored through the application of Euro-American psychiatric and colonial psychological knowledge; and (c) how persistent caste-based violence and exploitation in contemporary times reflects the “internal coloniality” of Indian society.","PeriodicalId":48306,"journal":{"name":"Review of General Psychology","volume":"25 1","pages":"422 - 436"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48741489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

Ecological Values Theory: Beyond Conformity, Goal-Seeking, and Rule-Following in Action and Interaction 生态价值理论:超越行动与互动中的从众、目标追求与规则遵循

IF 4.2 2区心理学

Review of General Psychology Pub Date : 2021-09-25 DOI: 10.1177/10892680211048174

Bert H. Hodges, J. Rączaszek-Leonardi

引用次数: 9

Psychology Exceptionalism and the Multiple Discovery of the Replication Crisis 心理学例外论与复制危机的多重发现

IF 4.2 2区心理学

Review of General Psychology Pub Date : 2021-09-23 DOI: 10.1177/10892680211046508

Nicole C. Nelson, Julie Chung, Kelsey Ichikawa, M. Malik

{"title":"Psychology Exceptionalism and the Multiple Discovery of the Replication Crisis","authors":"Nicole C. Nelson, Julie Chung, Kelsey Ichikawa, M. Malik","doi":"10.1177/10892680211046508","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211046508","url":null,"abstract":"This article outlines what we call the “narrative of psychology exceptionalism” in commentaries on the replication crisis: many thoughtful commentaries link the current crisis to the specificity of psychology’s history, methods, and subject matter, but explorations of the similarities between psychology and other fields are comparatively thin. Historical analyses of the replication crisis in psychology further contribute to this exceptionalism by creating a genealogy of events and personalities that shares little in common with other fields. We aim to rebalance this narrative by examining the emergence and evolution of replication discussions in psychology alongside their emergence and evolution in biomedicine. Through a mixed-methods analysis of commentaries on replication in psychology and the biomedical sciences, we find that these conversations have, from the early years of the crisis, shared a common core that centers on concerns about the effectiveness of traditional peer review, the need for greater transparency in methods and data, and the perverse incentive structure of academia. Drawing on Robert Merton’s framework for analyzing multiple discovery in science, we argue that the nearly simultaneous emergence of this narrative across fields suggests that there are shared historical, cultural, or institutional factors driving disillusionment with established scientific practices.","PeriodicalId":48306,"journal":{"name":"Review of General Psychology","volume":"26 1","pages":"184 - 198"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2021-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47937633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

The Tone Debate: Knowledge, Self, and Social Order 音调之争：知识、自我与社会秩序

IF 4.2 2区心理学

Review of General Psychology Pub Date : 2021-09-22 DOI: 10.1177/10892680211015636

Maarten Derksen, Sarah Field

引用次数: 10

Overempowered? Diversity-Focused Research with Gender/Sex and Sexual Majorities 过度授权？以性别/性和性专业为重点的多元化研究

IF 4.2 2区心理学

Review of General Psychology Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI: 10.1177/10892680211034461

Sari M. van Anders, Zach C. Schudson, Will J. Beischel, Emma C. Abed, Aki M. Gormezano, E. Dibble

{"title":"Overempowered? Diversity-Focused Research with Gender/Sex and Sexual Majorities","authors":"Sari M. van Anders, Zach C. Schudson, Will J. Beischel, Emma C. Abed, Aki M. Gormezano, E. Dibble","doi":"10.1177/10892680211034461","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211034461","url":null,"abstract":"Diversity-focused research can provide important insights about gender/sex and sexual diversity, including in relation to oppression and privilege. To do so, it needs to critically engage with power and include minoritized and majoritized participants. But, the critical methods guiding this are typically aimed at empowering marginalized groups and may “overempower” majority participants. Here, we discuss three diversity-focused research projects about gender/sex and sexual diversity where our use of critical methods overempowered majority participants in ways that reinforced their privilege. We detail how diversity-focused research approaches thus need to be “majority-situating”: attending to and managing the privilege and power that majority participants carry to research. Yet, we also lay out how diversity-focused research still needs to be “minority-inclusive”: validating, welcoming, and empowering to people from marginalized social locations. We discuss these approaches working synergistically; minority-inclusive methods can also be majority-situating, providing majorities with opportunities for growth, learning, and seeing that they—and not just “others”—are socially situated. We conclude by laying out what a diversity-focused research program might look like that includes both majority-situating and minority-inclusive approaches, to work towards a more just and empirical scholarship that does not lead to majorities who are even more overempowered.","PeriodicalId":48306,"journal":{"name":"Review of General Psychology","volume":"26 1","pages":"3 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48542445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0