Law and Human Behavior最新文献_第9页

Almost no one feels free to leave an interrogation room: Findings from a virtual reality study of custody perceptions in police interrogations. 几乎没有人可以自由地离开审讯室：一项关于警察审讯中监护观念的虚拟现实研究的发现。

IF 2.5 2区社会学

Law and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2025-10-30 DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000631

Hayley M. D. Cleary, Lucy A. Guarnera

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Do Gender Prototypes Influence Attorney Willingness to Represent Sexual Harassment Victims? 性别原型会影响律师代理性骚扰受害者的意愿吗？

IF 2.5 2区社会学

Law and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2025-10-27 DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000624.supp

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Almost No One Feels Free to Leave an Interrogation Room: Findings From a Virtual Reality Study of Custody Perceptions in Police Interrogations 几乎没有人能自由地离开审讯室：一项关于警察审讯中监护观念的虚拟现实研究的发现

IF 2.5 2区社会学

Law and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2025-10-27 DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000631.supp

引用次数: 0

Large language models (LLMs) as jurors: Assessing the potential of LLMs in legal contexts. 大型语言模型（法学硕士）作为陪审员：评估法学硕士在法律环境中的潜力。

IF 2.5 2区社会学

Law and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2025-10-20 DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000620

Yongjie Sun,Angelo Zappalà,Eleonora Di Maso,Francesco Pompedda,Thomas J Nyman,Pekka Santtila

{"title":"Large language models (LLMs) as jurors: Assessing the potential of LLMs in legal contexts.","authors":"Yongjie Sun,Angelo Zappalà,Eleonora Di Maso,Francesco Pompedda,Thomas J Nyman,Pekka Santtila","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000620","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVEWe explored the potential of large language models (LLMs) in legal decision making by replicating Fraser et al. (2023) mock jury experiment using LLMs (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and GPT-o1) as decision makers. We investigated LLMs' reactions to factors that influenced human jurors, including defendant race, social status, number of allegations, and reporting delay in sexual assault cases.HYPOTHESESWe hypothesized that LLMs would show higher consistency than humans, with no explicit but potential implicit biases. We also examined potential mediating factors (race-crime congruence, credibility, black sheep effect) and moderating effects (beliefs about traumatic memory, ease of reporting) explaining LLM decision making.METHODUsing a 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 factorial design, we manipulated defendant race (Black/White), social status (low/high), number of allegations (one/five), and reporting delay (5/20/35 years), collecting 2,304 responses across conditions. LLMs were prompted to act as jurors, providing probability of guilt assessments (0-100), dichotomous verdicts, and responses to mediator and moderator variables.RESULTSLLMs showed higher average probability of guilt assessments compared with humans (63.56 vs. 58.82) but were more conservative in rendering guilty verdicts (21% vs. 49%). Similar to humans, LLMs demonstrated bias against White defendants and increased guilt attributions with multiple allegations. Unlike humans, who showed minimal effects of reporting delay, LLMs assigned higher guilt probabilities to cases with shorter reporting delays. Mediation analyses revealed that race-crime stereotype congruency and the black sheep effect partially mediated the racial bias effect, whereas perceived memory strength mediated the reporting delay effect.CONCLUSIONSAlthough LLMs may offer more consistent decision making, they are not immune to biases and may interpret certain case factors differently from human jurors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145319120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Effect of juvenile justice financial sanctions on youths’ recidivism. 少年司法经济制裁对青少年再犯的影响。

IF 2.5 2区社会学

Law and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2025-10-16 DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000636

Luyi Jian, Jennifer L. Skeem, Jaclyn E. Chambers

引用次数: 0

Breaking the silence: Bystander reporting to law enforcement disrupts individuals moving toward targeted violence. 打破沉默：向执法部门报告的旁观者扰乱了个人走向有针对性的暴力。

IF 2.5 2区社会学

Law and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2025-10-16 DOI: 10.1037/lhb0000630

Taylor R. R. Cilke, Margot M. Williams, Nicole Tuomi Jones, Karie A. Gibson, Angel E. Gray

引用次数: 0

Evaluating the effectiveness of simplified Miranda warnings: An empirical examination of policy on youth comprehension and waiver decisions. 评估简化米兰达警告的有效性：对青少年理解和豁免决定政策的实证检验。