Basic and Applied Social Psychology最新文献_第8页

To Apologize or Justify: Leader Responses to Task and Relational Mistakes 道歉或辩护:领导者对任务和关系错误的反应

IF 2.4 3区心理学

Basic and Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-10-19 DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2020.1828083

A. Hetrick, Lily D. Blocker, Joshua Fairchild, Samuel T. Hunter

{"title":"To Apologize or Justify: Leader Responses to Task and Relational Mistakes","authors":"A. Hetrick, Lily D. Blocker, Joshua Fairchild, Samuel T. Hunter","doi":"10.1080/01973533.2020.1828083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2020.1828083","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Leadership roles are complex, creating an environment where leaders are likely to make mistakes that result in negative outcomes. We shift the conversation in the literature from examining the effectiveness of mistake responses toward exploring why leaders use different mistake recovery methods. We employ an online experimental method to distinguish between task and relationship mistakes for leaders and suggest that different attributions are made for these two types of mistakes (Study 1). We found that task mistakes are viewed by leaders as more specific and less personal, and that relationship mistakes are viewed as more global, describing the leader’s stable characteristics rather than a specific event. From these findings, we predict that leaders are more likely to apologize for task mistakes and are more likely to justify their relationship mistakes rather than admit wrongdoing for them. We find support for these predictions using a mixed methods approach, employing a laboratory experiment (Study 2) and a critical incident method surveying a panel of leaders (Study 3). As such, this paper extends our understanding of the mistake recovery process for leaders by demonstrating that 1) leaders’ relationship mistakes are viewed as more globally representative of the leader than task mistakes, and 2) leaders are more likely to apologize for task mistakes but more likely to justify relationship mistakes. Relational and task mistakes, however, were not found to be different in regard to their ambiguity or the extent to which they were viewed as a mistake.","PeriodicalId":48014,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Applied Social Psychology","volume":"43 1","pages":"30 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01973533.2020.1828083","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44298309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Ambivalent Classism: The Importance of Assessing Hostile and Benevolent Ideologies about Poor People 二元古典主义：评价穷人的敌对和仁爱思想的重要性

IF 2.4 3区心理学

Basic and Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-10-05 DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2020.1828084

J. Jordan, Joanna Lawler, J. Bosson

引用次数: 11

Supervisor Narcissism and Employee Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model of Affective Organizational Commitment and Power Distance Orientation 主管自恋与员工绩效:情感性组织承诺与权力距离取向的中介模型

IF 2.4 3区心理学

Basic and Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-09-09 DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2020.1810042

Hanwei Wang, Xue Han, Jie Li

引用次数: 19

Is Affirmation the Cure? Self-Affirmation and European-Americans’ Perception of Systemic Racism 肯定是治愈方法吗?自我肯定与欧裔美国人对系统性种族主义的认知

IF 2.4 3区心理学

Basic and Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2020.1811092

Tara L. Lesick, Ethan Zell

引用次数: 0

Failure to Replicate: Testing a Growth Mindset Intervention for College Student Success 失败复制:测试成长型思维干预大学生成功

IF 2.4 3区心理学

Basic and Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-08-12 DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2020.1806845

Caitlin Brez, Eric M. Hampton, Linda S. Behrendt, L. Brown, Josh Powers

引用次数: 13

I Read, I Imagine, I Feel: Feasibility, Imaginability and Intensity of Emotional Experience as Fundamental Dimensions for Norming Scripts 我读，我想象，我感觉：情感体验的可行性、可想象性和强度是规范剧本的基本维度

IF 2.4 3区心理学

Basic and Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-07-28 DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2020.1796670

Dalit Milshtein, A. Henik

{"title":"I Read, I Imagine, I Feel: Feasibility, Imaginability and Intensity of Emotional Experience as Fundamental Dimensions for Norming Scripts","authors":"Dalit Milshtein, A. Henik","doi":"10.1080/01973533.2020.1796670","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2020.1796670","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Emotional imagery procedures can be used as beneficial means for study of a variety of issues (e.g., emotion, episodic memory, imagination, consciousness, attitudes, social domain, and so on) from an ecological perspective. Emotional imagery is also a worthy subject of research by itself. There are several procedures to encourage participants to generate, manipulate and maintain emotional imagery during lab experiments. Script-driven imagery is the most developed and widespread procedure. However, there are no uniform norms for creating and validating emotional scripts and neutral ones as well. In addition, there is no unanimity about the important dimensions of the scripts and how they can affect the experimental procedures. In the current paper, we present a 3-step process for creating and validating emotional and neutral 9-word scripts that can be used in a wide range of procedures. We discuss the various relevant scripts’ dimensions and present findings that suggest considering the feasibility dimension as a basis for distinguishing between positive and negative events. While for positive events, as expected, participants rated realistic themes as highly feasible, and fantastic themes as low in feasibility, for negative events such a distinction almost vanished. In other words, we do not just tend to expect good things in the future (optimism bias), but also reject odds of negative events even though we are aware of their high prevalence (\"it won't happen to me\").","PeriodicalId":48014,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Applied Social Psychology","volume":"42 1","pages":"432 - 459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01973533.2020.1796670","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46149265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

There is Nothing Magical about Bayesian Statistics: An Introduction to Epistemic Probabilities in Data Analysis for Psychology Starters 贝叶斯统计没有什么神奇的:为心理学初学者介绍数据分析中的认知概率

IF 2.4 3区心理学

Basic and Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-07-25 DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2020.1792297

Wojciech Świątkowski, Antonin Carrier

引用次数: 8

Unjudge Someone: Human Library as a Tool to Reduce Prejudice toward Stigmatized Group Members 不评判某人:人类图书馆作为一种工具来减少对被污名化的群体成员的偏见

IF 2.4 3区心理学

Basic and Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-07-14 DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2020.1792298

S. Bagci, Olesya Blazhenkova

{"title":"Unjudge Someone: Human Library as a Tool to Reduce Prejudice toward Stigmatized Group Members","authors":"S. Bagci, Olesya Blazhenkova","doi":"10.1080/01973533.2020.1792298","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2020.1792298","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Human Library (HL) is a nonprofit community event aimed at increasing awareness and reduction of prejudice toward stigmatized groups in the society. HL implements an unusual methodology in the format of a pretend ‘library’ where HL attendants so-called ‘Readers’ engage in short, face-to-face, direct contact with so-called ‘Books’ who are real individuals from various stigmatized social groups. Although HL has been widely used in various contexts since 2000’s and is recommended as the best practice of integration by European Commission, empirical research testing its effectiveness is limited. Our study presented the findings from four consecutive HL events conducted from 2016 to 2019 in Turkey (total N = 534). Including various control groups, we tested the effectiveness of HL as a direct intergroup contact intervention on affective (trust, empathy), cognitive (knowledge), and behavioral (e.g., willingness to talk to outgroup members) aspects of outgroup attitudes. Findings demonstrated that while overall outgroup attitudes became more positive after HL attendance, unlike merely participating in the event or not attending HL, actual contact (‘Reading a Book’), in particular, improved attitudes toward the target groups. While supporting the overall benefits of HL methodology as a contact intervention, our study demonstrated that HL may be more effective on certain dimensions of attitudes. Practical implications and possible limitations of HL, as well as perspectives for future research were discussed.","PeriodicalId":48014,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Applied Social Psychology","volume":"42 1","pages":"413 - 431"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01973533.2020.1792298","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47186106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

Controlling Language and Irony: Reducing Threat and Increasing Positive Message Evaluations 控制语言和讽刺：减少威胁，增加正面信息评价

IF 2.4 3区心理学

Basic and Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-07-11 DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2020.1789464

Tom Staunton, Eusebio M Alvaro, B. Rosenberg, W. Crano

引用次数: 4

Perceptions of and Behavior toward University Students with Autism 大学生孤独症的认知与行为

IF 2.4 3区心理学

Basic and Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2020.1785468

Joshua Lipson, Caitlin J Taylor, J. Burk, Cheryl L. Dickter

引用次数: 13