Anadrika Debbarma, Om Prakash, Druhin Grover, Amit Khanna, Manoj Kumar, Deepak Kumar
{"title":"Fitness to Stand Trial in India: Demographic, Clinical, and Legal Profiles of Court-Referred Defendants.","authors":"Anadrika Debbarma, Om Prakash, Druhin Grover, Amit Khanna, Manoj Kumar, Deepak Kumar","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychiatric illnesses and intellectual disabilities commonly occur in the criminal justice system and may impair an individual's ability to participate effectively in legal proceedings. Fitness to stand trial (FST) is an important safeguard for ensuring fair trial processes. This retrospective chart review examined the demographic, clinical, and legal profiles of 159 court-referred individuals assessed for FST at a major tertiary forensic psychiatry centre in New Delhi (India) between January 2017 and December 2022. Data on sociodemographic variables, ICD-10 diagnoses, current mental status, alleged offences, and FST outcomes were analysed using chi-square/Fisher's exact tests and multivariate logistic regression. The sample was predominantly male (81.1%) with a mean age of 37.9 years (SD 14.2). Psychotic disorders were the most frequent diagnosis (35.2%), followed by bipolar affective disorder and intellectual disability. Violent offences constituted 62.9% of alleged crimes. Overall, 54.7% were found fit to stand trial. Active psychiatric symptoms (adjusted OR 47.2, 95% CI 6.1-365.3) and organic mental disorder or intellectual disability (adjusted OR 22.5, 95% CI 4.8-105.6) independently predicted unfitness. Active psychopathology and cognitive impairment were the strongest determinants of unfitness, highlighting the need for structured assessment tools and restoration programmes under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148593951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Georgia M Winters, Elizabeth L Jeglic, Samantha Matthews
{"title":"The Use of Sexual Grooming by Attorneys in Court.","authors":"Georgia M Winters, Elizabeth L Jeglic, Samantha Matthews","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Child sexual abuse (CSA) cases rely on attorneys, judges, and jurors having an accurate understanding of complex abuse dynamics, including sexual grooming. While sexual grooming is widely used in research and legal contexts, little is known about how attorneys understand and use the construct. This study examined attorneys' knowledge, perceptions, and utilization of sexual grooming in CSA cases. Fifty-one attorneys from 23 U.S. states completed an online survey. Attorneys viewed sexual grooming as useful (M = 8.82/10), with 88% having used it in their cases. Around half (55%) used expert testimony on the topic, which they rated as highly helpful (M = 9.08/10). Most attorneys learned about sexual grooming through professional trainings, and many expressed a need for additional expert witnesses and investigative evidence on sexual grooming. Sexual grooming is valued in CSA prosecution and thus, continued education, expert consultation, and use of current research are important.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148498272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Moving Beyond \"Malingering\": Reconceptualizing Feigned Symptoms as Motive-Based Phenomena.","authors":"Jacob M Appel","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Malingering-traditionally defined as the intentional production of false or exaggerated symptoms for external gain-has long been treated as a unitary construct. Yet patients who feign illness do so for widely divergent reasons, from seeking material necessities to avoiding legal accountability. This paper critiques the limitations of \"malingering\" as a clinical category and proposes a motivation-based taxonomy of feigned symptoms: Resource-Driven Symptom Expression (RDSE), Accountability-Avoidant Symptom Expression (AASE), Care Access Symptom Expression (CASE), and Socially Motivated Symptom Expression (SMSE). By reframing feigned presentations through motive rather than symptomatology, clinicians can bring an individualized, ethical and just approach to a significant clinical challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2026-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148473436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Teacher–Student Relationship Quality as a Mediator in the Association of Parent–Child Communication With Adolescent Bullying Perpetration and Substance Use: Evidence From the 2017/2018 HBSC Study","authors":"Hang Zhou, Ji-Kang Chen","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70056","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70056","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bullying perpetration and substance use are two prevalent and concerning forms of delinquent behavior worldwide. Although parent–child communication has been theorized to reduce adolescents' involvement in these behaviors, empirical evidence remains mixed. Teacher-student relationship quality has been proposed as a potential mediator, but evidence from cross-national studies is limited. Using data from the 2017/2018 Health Behavior in School-Aged Children (HBSC) study, this study examined a theoretical model in which teacher–student relationship quality mediates the associations of parent–child communication with bullying perpetration and substance use. Potential sex differences in these interrelationships were also examined. Results indicated that parent–child communication was negatively associated with bullying perpetration and substance use, with teacher-student relationship quality partially mediating these associations. Moreover, multi-group analyses showed that the model fit well for boys and girls. These findings underscore the significance of fostering positive parent–child communication and teacher–student relationships to reduce adolescent bullying perpetration and substance use.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 3","pages":"469-478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bsl.70056","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147469656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Towards a Developmental Retribution and Reciprocity Model (RRM): Implications for Youth Justice","authors":"Evelyn Svingen","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70051","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70051","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Youth justice systems are frequently justified by reference to developmental change, yet chronological age is often treated as a proxy for underlying psychological processes. This paper develops a Developmental Retribution and Reciprocity Model (RRM), integrating evolutionary criminology with contemporary developmental neuroscience to clarify how reciprocity, retribution, and cooperation are expressed across development. Behavioural economic tasks and hypothetical crime scenarios from an adult sample (<i>N</i> = 300), spanning late adolescence and early adulthood, are used to examine whether age is associated with positive reciprocity, negative reciprocity, retaliatory punishment, and offending-related tendencies. Developmental theory would predict age-related differences across this period; however, no meaningful associations with age (from the age of 16 onward) were observed. The absence of age-graded variation in reciprocity and retributive responding within adulthood is consistent with the possibility that the underlying motivational structures captured by RRM stabilise earlier in development, whilst their behavioural expression continues to be shaped by regulation and context. The paper therefore emphasises the importance of focussing youth justice interventions and future research on these earlier developmental periods, where socialisation, legitimacy, and cooperative norms may be most effectively shaped.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 3","pages":"437-449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bsl.70051","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147370411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Taking Fuel From the Fire: Regulating the Introduction of Rape Myth Infused and Irrelevant Evidence About Complainants in Rape Trials","authors":"Susan Leahy","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70054","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70054","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article considers how victim-blaming and stereotypical attitudes about appropriate victim behaviour can impact upon the operation of rape trials, particularly by prejudicing a complainant's testimony where s/he can be portrayed as having departed from the stereotypical norm of a ‘real victim’. While recommendations for tackling such attitudes within the trial understandably focus on extra-legal interventions such as juror education or broader societal awareness initiatives, it is argued here that law reform still has a role to play. Drawing on the jurisdiction of Ireland as a case study, the article considers how reform of the rules of evidence (specifically rules relating to the admission of sexual experience evidence and disclosure of personal records) might be reformed to minimise the potential for the introduction of prejudicial and irrelevant evidence about complainants which can fuel the influence of stereotypes about ‘real victims’ upon the trial process.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 3","pages":"495-507"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bsl.70054","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147582734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Effect of Rape Myth Acceptance and Empathy Priming on Juror Decisions in a Mock Sexual Assault Trial","authors":"Julie Blais, Daphne Bolduc","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70050","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70050","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The purpose of the current study was to examine the impact of rape myth acceptance (RMA), as measured by a relatively new ‘subtle’ RMA scale, and an experimental empathy manipulation on juror verdicts in a mock sexual assault trial. A sample of 260 Canadian citizens/permanent residents were recruited through Qualtrics, where they were randomly assigned to read a fictional sexual assault trial transcript that either contained an empathy inducing statement or asked participants to remain objective. As hypothesised, scores on the subtle measure of RMA predicted participants' likelihood to provide not guilty verdicts. However, the empathy prime was ineffective in inducing more empathy for the complainant. Importantly, participants whose open-ended answers contained evidence of RMA also scored higher on the self-report RMA scale, demonstrating the validity of the subtle measure. Our findings advance the literature on RMA measurement and provide evidence for the continued impact of RMA on juror verdicts.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 3","pages":"425-436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146776158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
David J. Gilbert, Stephen Ikechukwu Azumara, Jacqueline M. Wheatcroft, Karen Steele, Penny Cook, Raja Mukherjee, Gisli Gudjonsson, Natalie Novick Brown
{"title":"FASD and Intellectual Disability Equivalence: A Meta-Analysis of Suggestibility During Forensic Interviews","authors":"David J. Gilbert, Stephen Ikechukwu Azumara, Jacqueline M. Wheatcroft, Karen Steele, Penny Cook, Raja Mukherjee, Gisli Gudjonsson, Natalie Novick Brown","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70052","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70052","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intellectual disability (ID) equivalence describes conditions in which individuals function cognitively and adaptively at levels comparable to ID without meeting IQ-based diagnostic criteria. Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is characterised by impaired executive and adaptive functioning despite IQs often above the ID threshold, suggesting functional overlap with ID. This meta-analytic study is the first to examine whether FASD and ID share vulnerabilities in interrogative suggestibility. Two PRISMA-guided systematic searches of six databases were undertaken, and identified studies involving FASD or ID. Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses were conducted on Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale–2 outcomes: Yield 1, Yield 2, Shift, and Total Suggestibility. Individuals with FASD showed levels of interrogative suggestibility comparable to, and sometimes exceeding, those with ID across all indices. Effect sizes were large for both groups, with particularly elevated Shift scores in individuals with FASD. Both groups are highly vulnerable to leading questions and interrogative pressure. Individuals with FASD may be especially prone to changing responses following negative feedback, highlighting important forensic interviewing implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 3","pages":"450-460"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bsl.70052","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147379233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Trauma Mitigating in Emerging Adult Sentencing? An Experimental Examination of the Influence of Homicide Defendants' Age and Biopsychosocial Factors on the Public's Punitiveness","authors":"Victoria Rivera Laugalis","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70047","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70047","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The U.S. maintains some of the most punitive sentencing policies, but public opinion plays a role in justice policy. Although the public generally supports rehabilitation and less punitive sentencing for juveniles, less is known about public attitudes toward sentencing emerging adults (18-to-25-year-olds)—a population disproportionately represented in the criminal justice system. This paper analyzes data from an experimental survey with factorial vignettes administered to college students to examine emerging adult age and biopsychosocial factors on sentencing punitiveness. Chi-squared and one-way ANOVAs were employed to evaluate group differences and multinomial logistic regression to examine the effects of the randomized factors on the sentence outcomes. The biological and psychological trauma experienced by the defendant convicted of homicide in this study were mitigating factors in emerging adult sentence punitiveness. The results provide insight into potential jurors' and future criminal justice professionals' consideration of biopsychosocial information in sentencing directly impacting justice-involved emerging adults.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 3","pages":"361-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146107995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jun Sung Hong, Dong Ha Kim, Paul R. Sterzing, Matthew M. Rivas-Koehl, Dorothy L. Espelage
{"title":"From Bullying Victimization to Sexual Coercion Victimization: Do These Differ for Heterosexual and LGB Adolescents in the United States?","authors":"Jun Sung Hong, Dong Ha Kim, Paul R. Sterzing, Matthew M. Rivas-Koehl, Dorothy L. Espelage","doi":"10.1002/bsl.70053","DOIUrl":"10.1002/bsl.70053","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The current study proposes pathways from bullying victimization to sexual coercion victimization mediated by using drugs and engaging in sex with drugs. The study sample included heterosexual or LGB youth. Measures included bullying victimization, using drugs, engaging in sex with drugs, sexual coercion victimization, and the covariates, which are sex and age. Path analyses were conducted for heterosexual and LGB adolescents. Among heterosexuals, bullying victimization was positively associated with sexual coercion victimization. Using drugs and engaging in sex with drugs were also positively associated with sexual coercion victimization. Among LGBs, bullying victimization was positively associated with sexual coercion victimization. Using drugs and engaging in sex with drugs were also positively related to sexual coercion victimization. Findings from the study have implications for juvenile justice and school-based practice.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47926,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law","volume":"44 3","pages":"461-468"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147464019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}