British Journal of Industrial Relations最新文献_第10页

Research Handbook on Human Resource Management and Disruptive Technologies 人力资源管理与颠覆性技术研究手册

IF 2.2 2区管理学

British Journal of Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12868

Valerio della Sala

引用次数: 0

Structural Unfairness or Disrespect and Misrecognition? Theorising the Pathway Between Feelings of Injustice and Collective Mobilisation Among Precarious Migrant Workers 结构性不公平还是不尊重和误解？不稳定农民工的不公正感受与集体动员之间的路径理论化

IF 2.2 2区管理学

British Journal of Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12867

Andrea Borello

{"title":"Structural Unfairness or Disrespect and Misrecognition? Theorising the Pathway Between Feelings of Injustice and Collective Mobilisation Among Precarious Migrant Workers","authors":"Andrea Borello","doi":"10.1111/bjir.12867","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12867","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Industrial relations scholars have long been concerned with theorising collective mobilisation among workers, and it is well-established that workers’ feelings of injustice can spark collective mobilisation. However, no attempts have to date been devoted to understanding how migrants experience feelings of injustice, although various other attempts have been made to theorise migrant worker collectivism. Through empirically founded field work in three sectors, this article contributes to theorise collective mobilisation among precarious migrant workers by combining Kelly's mobilisation theory with Tapia and Alberti's multi-level approach to intersectionality. It starts from the premise that collective mobilisation begins with shared feelings of injustice and offers novel evidence to migrants’ experiences with injustice in contexts of intersecting precarity. Using a conceptual prism that distinguishes between restorative and retributive forms of justice, I show that although migrants are subject to distinct structural unfairness, they rarely ascribe retribute, class-based struggles for justice as a cause for mobilisation. Rather, migrant workers mainly express feelings of injustice through disrespect and misrecognition resembling a restorative justice logic. These findings offer conceptual clarification to Kelly's mobilisation theory and can potentially move future research forward to a more nuanced understanding of the intersections between feelings, contexts of precarity and collective mobilisation.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47846,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Industrial Relations","volume":"63 3","pages":"413-426"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144751454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Enabling Inclusion: An Analysis of Positive and Negative Outcomes of Discretionary Work Arrangements for Employees With Disabilities 促进包容：残障员工自由裁量工作安排的正面与负面结果分析

IF 2.2 2区管理学

British Journal of Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12862

Jonathan E. Booth, Daniela Lup

{"title":"Enabling Inclusion: An Analysis of Positive and Negative Outcomes of Discretionary Work Arrangements for Employees With Disabilities","authors":"Jonathan E. Booth, Daniela Lup","doi":"10.1111/bjir.12862","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12862","url":null,"abstract":"<p>While it is well-known that employees with disabilities have significantly more negative work experiences compared to other employees, research geared towards understanding how employers could improve some of these experiences is still underdeveloped. To advance this research agenda, this study investigates links between five distinct types of discretionary arrangements (work discretion, scheduling discretion, part-timing, homeworking and pay for individual performance), and outcomes related to work experiences and the wellbeing of employees with disabilities (job satisfaction, perception of fairness, recognition, motivation, engagement, work stress and work-life interference). To explore these links, we use data from the European Working Conditions Survey (2015). We find that not all work arrangements that increase discretion at the workplace have a positive impact on employees with disabilities and that some can be especially detrimental. By unpacking the multiple ways in which various types of discretion at the workplace affect employees with disabilities, this study not only makes a theoretical contribution but also provides employers who aim to improve the working experiences of employees with disabilities with some empirical evidence to help them take more inclusive actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47846,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Industrial Relations","volume":"63 3","pages":"394-412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjir.12862","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144751481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Labour Share and Corporate Financialization: Evidence From Publicly Listed Firms 劳动份额与公司金融化：来自上市公司的证据

IF 2.2 2区管理学

British Journal of Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12864

Alexander Guschanski, Özlem Onaran

引用次数: 0

Power to Win: The Living Wage Movement in Aotearoa New Zealand 胜利的力量：新西兰奥特罗阿的生活工资运动

IF 1.3 2区管理学

British Journal of Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12865

Calum Carson

引用次数: 0

An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Financialisation on the Rate of Profit for the US (1955–2019) 金融化对美国利润率影响的实证分析（1955-2019）

IF 1.3 2区管理学

British Journal of Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12858

Maria Cristina Barbieri Góes, Matteo Deleidi, Stefano Di Bucchianico, Luigi Salvati

引用次数: 0

Determinants of Social Dialogue in European Countries (1980–2018) 欧洲国家社会对话的决定因素（1980-2018）

IF 1.3 2区管理学

British Journal of Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12863

Alexandre Afonso, Maximilian Kiecker, Pedro Goulart

引用次数: 0

Green Transition and Industrial Relations at the Workplace: Evidence From Italian Firms 绿色转型和工作场所的劳资关系：来自意大利公司的证据

IF 1.3 2区管理学

British Journal of Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12859

M. Damiani, Fabrizio Pompei, Andrea Ricci

引用次数: 0

Organizational Governance and Trade-Offs Between Pay and Subjective Employee Well-Being: A Comparative Analysis 组织治理与薪酬与员工主观幸福感权衡：比较分析

IF 1.3 2区管理学

British Journal of Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12860

John W. Budd, J. Ryan Lamare

引用次数: 0

Neither Employment nor Self-Employment: Avenues Towards Functional Platform-Mediated Work Systems 既不是雇佣也不是自雇：通往功能平台中介工作系统的途径

IF 1.3 2区管理学

British Journal of Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI: 10.1111/bjir.12855

Sara Maric, Elke S. Schuessler, Laura Thäter

{"title":"Neither Employment nor Self-Employment: Avenues Towards Functional Platform-Mediated Work Systems","authors":"Sara Maric, Elke S. Schuessler, Laura Thäter","doi":"10.1111/bjir.12855","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12855","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital labour platforms are contested because they create work relationships that neither fall into the category of traditional employment nor fulfil the criteria of freelance work due to platforms’ heavy interference in the work process. Although existing research has elucidated different pathways for improving the working conditions of platform workers, we develop an employment relations perspective on platform-mediated work systems building on David Marsden's theory of employment systems. On the basis of an assessment of the psychological, economic and legal contracts underlying platform-mediated work, we discuss the limited functionality of these contracts in their ability to control opportunism among platforms, workers and clients. Our analysis contributes to existing debates by providing a theoretically informed framework for analysing the design of platform-mediated work systems and their consequences for the participating parties. Our insights add nuance to the platform regulation debate by going beyond the question of worker classification towards understanding the organizational and institutional elements of the work system that need to be redesigned and supported by appropriate institutional safeguards. An employment systems perspective also allows for reflection on the economic, societal, sectoral and strategic conditions that could drive such changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47846,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Industrial Relations","volume":"63 2","pages":"287-304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjir.12855","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143846201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0