Legislative Studies Quarterly最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The Duration of Caretaker Periods and the Formation of Parliamentary Governments 看守时期的持续时间与议会制政府的组成
IF 2.4 3区 社会学
Legislative Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1111/lsq.70045
Francesco Bromo
{"title":"The Duration of Caretaker Periods and the Formation of Parliamentary Governments","authors":"Francesco Bromo","doi":"10.1111/lsq.70045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70045","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, I focus on an understudied aspect of the cabinet formation process in parliamentary democracies: the caretaker periods associated with it. Building on the existing literature on government formation, I discuss conceptualization and measurement of caretaker periods, defined as periods during which a government is no longer or cannot be tolerated by a majority in the legislature, and encompassing the process of formation of a new government that is and can be tolerated by the same or a different majority. I leverage a dataset of parliamentary events that, on the basis of this conceptualization, allows me to separate full-power cabinets from caretaker periods rigorously and systematically according to a country's specific constitutional arrangements. Using survival analysis, I examine over 900 caretaker spells across 34 countries between 1945 and 2020. My goal is to assess how institutional and contextual differences account for variation in the duration of caretaker periods, as well as the government formation processes taking place during these periods, across countries and over time. The evidence helps paint a more refined picture of how new cabinets emerge and the occurrence of delays under different sets of conditions in the context of caretaker periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":47672,"journal":{"name":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lsq.70045","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145695146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Does It Matter What You Do (Or Only Who You Are)? On the Effects of Parliamentarians' Behavior on Vote Choice 重要的是你做什么(还是你是谁)?论议员行为对投票选择的影响
IF 2.4 3区 社会学
Legislative Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-11-24 DOI: 10.1111/lsq.70044
Maxime Walder, Stefanie Bailer, Nathalie Giger
{"title":"Does It Matter What You Do (Or Only Who You Are)? On the Effects of Parliamentarians' Behavior on Vote Choice","authors":"Maxime Walder,&nbsp;Stefanie Bailer,&nbsp;Nathalie Giger","doi":"10.1111/lsq.70044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70044","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Politicians differ in their policy positions, but also in their behavior in parliament and the constituency. While research has shown that personal characteristics of politicians matter for voter evaluation, we have little knowledge as to which activities inside and outside parliament have the greatest impact on voters' evaluation of their representatives. Based on survey experiments conducted in the UK, Poland, the Netherlands, France, and Belgium, we show that voters clearly reward politicians for engaged behavior, in particular time spent in the constituency. These findings carry significant implications for the type of information conveyed to voters during election campaigns.</p>","PeriodicalId":47672,"journal":{"name":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","volume":"50 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lsq.70044","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145618961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parliamentary Staff Size Around the World 世界各地议会工作人员的规模
IF 2.4 3区 社会学
Legislative Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1111/lsq.70040
Daan Hofland, Simon Otjes
{"title":"Parliamentary Staff Size Around the World","authors":"Daan Hofland,&nbsp;Simon Otjes","doi":"10.1111/lsq.70040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article is the first to take a global perspective on parliamentary administrations, which are vital for democratic governance. Basic facts like what drives the number of parliamentary staffers are unknown to political science. Drawing from a functionalist framework, we propose that staff plays different roles which lead to different possible drivers: if staff primarily serves to relay information from and to the population, population size is likely a major driver. If staff primarily serves to advise MPs in their oversight work, stronger parliaments will have more staff. If staff primarily serves to assist MPs in their day-to-day work, assembly size drives staff size. As an alternative, we apply the notion of institutional isomorphism. Parliaments in shared networks will likely emulate each other. We analyze data from 144 countries. We find that staff size reflects assembly size, population size and parliamentary power.</p>","PeriodicalId":47672,"journal":{"name":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","volume":"50 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lsq.70040","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145581075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A More Future-Oriented Legislature? The Impact of a Permanent “Future Committee” on the Temporal Focus of MPs 一个更面向未来的立法机构?永久性“未来委员会”对国会议员时间关注点的影响
IF 2.4 3区 社会学
Legislative Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-11-12 DOI: 10.1111/lsq.70043
Chris Hanretty, Vesa Koskimaa
{"title":"A More Future-Oriented Legislature? The Impact of a Permanent “Future Committee” on the Temporal Focus of MPs","authors":"Chris Hanretty,&nbsp;Vesa Koskimaa","doi":"10.1111/lsq.70043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70043","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Political short-sightedness is commonly considered a problem for democracies struggling with long-term challenges, but few proposed cures for political myopia have been implemented. We study the world's first and only genuinely institutionalized legislature-based “future committee”, Finland's Committee for the Future (CF). Our outcome variable is a novel and unobtrusive speech-based measure of individuals’ temporal focus that is measured at the MP level over time. When comparing individuals before, during and after their service on the CF, we find a statistically significant but modest impact of CF membership on how much committee members talk about the future in the plenary. Compared to non-members, committee members utter roughly one more future-focused sentence every three hundred sentences. Such institutions can thus induce more future-oriented thinking into legislatures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47672,"journal":{"name":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","volume":"50 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lsq.70043","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145521939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tabling Debate: How Local Officials Try to Use Agenda Control to Stifle Conflict 搁置辩论:地方官员如何试图利用议程控制来扼杀冲突
IF 2.4 3区 社会学
Legislative Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-11-12 DOI: 10.1111/lsq.70042
Mirya R. Holman, Tyler Simko
{"title":"Tabling Debate: How Local Officials Try to Use Agenda Control to Stifle Conflict","authors":"Mirya R. Holman,&nbsp;Tyler Simko","doi":"10.1111/lsq.70042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70042","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Public officials influence policymaking by deciding which items receive attention and action—and which do not. Accounts from national legislatures typically explain agenda control in terms of party leadership and discipline. But, do politicians try to exert agenda control outside highly professionalized legislatures? We bring the agenda control discussion to US school boards, which lack strong party control and feature few restrictions on agendas. We argue that local officials will increase their use of procedural rules to try to avoid making decisions in conflictual settings. We test our argument by constructing measures of both agenda control and conflict in a dataset of nearly 65,000 school board meeting transcripts. Consistent with our theory, we document an increased use of procedural control in highly contentious meetings. Responses from these school board members to a novel survey experiment confirm the causal link: they increase their use of tabling when conflict occurs on an issue.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47672,"journal":{"name":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","volume":"50 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145521899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cheerleaders for Autocracy: Parliamentary Speech Making During Democratic Backsliding in Malawi and Zambia 独裁的啦啦队:马拉维和赞比亚民主倒退期间的议会演讲
IF 2.4 3区 社会学
Legislative Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-11-06 DOI: 10.1111/lsq.70041
Nikolaos Frantzeskakis, Alejandra López Villegas, Michael Wahman
{"title":"Cheerleaders for Autocracy: Parliamentary Speech Making During Democratic Backsliding in Malawi and Zambia","authors":"Nikolaos Frantzeskakis,&nbsp;Alejandra López Villegas,&nbsp;Michael Wahman","doi":"10.1111/lsq.70041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Legislatures worldwide have played a decisive role in enabling and preventing democratic backsliding. Although most research has focused on the formal legislative role of parliaments in the backsliding process, this study focuses on the behavior of individual legislators and their discursive support for executives. We argue that government parties are likely to enhance pressure on government party legislators to support the executive during periods of backsliding. Using a new dataset of over 152,000 speeches from parliaments in Malawi and Zambia, we show that in both Malawi and Zambia, government party MPs were significantly more positive vis-à-vis the executive in parliamentary speeches during periods of backsliding. However, opposition MPs were not more critical of the executive in periods when democracy was eroding. The findings have important implications for understanding the institutional role of parties and legislatures in the process of backsliding.</p>","PeriodicalId":47672,"journal":{"name":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","volume":"50 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lsq.70041","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145469905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
District Size and Proximity to the Pork Barrel in Congressional Elections 选区大小和国会选举中猪肉桶的接近程度
IF 2.4 3区 社会学
Legislative Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-10-21 DOI: 10.1111/lsq.70039
Brian T. Hamel, Lanie Richards
{"title":"District Size and Proximity to the Pork Barrel in Congressional Elections","authors":"Brian T. Hamel,&nbsp;Lanie Richards","doi":"10.1111/lsq.70039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70039","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We propose that district size moderates the relationship between pork barrel spending and U.S. House election outcomes. Our argument is two-fold: (1) pork has a greater effect on citizens' lives—and thus, their vote—when allocated in geographic proximity to them; and (2) in smaller districts, pork projects are proximate for more people, increasing their reach and impact. We provide empirical support for our argument using a pre-registered survey experiment and observational data from two recent Congresses. Most notably, we find that earmarks are modestly associated with higher vote shares for the incumbent in smaller districts but make no electoral difference in larger districts. These results cannot be explained by other legislator and district characteristics. Our paper highlights how the physical characteristics of House districts can shape electoral accountability and offers a novel structural explanation for why decades of research have found almost no overall relationship between pork and votes.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47672,"journal":{"name":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","volume":"50 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145366383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Partisan Politics of Rainy Day Fund Investment 雨天基金投资的党派政治
IF 2.4 3区 社会学
Legislative Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-10-21 DOI: 10.1111/lsq.70038
Lauren Futter
{"title":"The Partisan Politics of Rainy Day Fund Investment","authors":"Lauren Futter","doi":"10.1111/lsq.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>When do legislatures save for disasters and economic downturns? How do electoral uncertainty and majority party agenda control influence these decisions? I develop a two-stage bargaining model of rainy day fund (RDF) investment. In the first stage, a legislator from the majority party proposes an allocation of the budget between an RDF, particularistic good, and public good. Before the second stage, there is an election and an economic crisis may occur. If a crisis occurs, the legislature can access an existing RDF to fund relief. The model predicts that a majority party is more likely to save when it is likely to remain in the majority, though saving remains below socially optimal levels. Supermajority and other requirements for larger voting coalitions incentivize RDF investment. Testing the results of the model empirically using measures of partisan competition reveal that states with stronger majorities are more likely to invest in their RDFs.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47672,"journal":{"name":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","volume":"50 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145366384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Effect of Policy Traceability on Legislative Incentives 政策追溯对立法激励的影响
IF 2.4 3区 社会学
Legislative Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-10-07 DOI: 10.1111/lsq.70036
Matto Mildenberger, Alexander Sahn
{"title":"The Effect of Policy Traceability on Legislative Incentives","authors":"Matto Mildenberger,&nbsp;Alexander Sahn","doi":"10.1111/lsq.70036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70036","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Theories of legislative politics have long emphasized how a policy's traceability—whether and how voters connect legislative action with policy effects—shapes political incentives to legislate. Douglas Arnold emphasized how the “nature of the causal chain that links a policy instrument with its policy effects” structures the logic of congressional action. Despite its prominence, this key theoretical claim has received little empirical attention. In this article, we use two survey experiments to test how several policy attributes—including traceability—shape legislators and public policy preferences. We find that elites are responsive to both policy traceability and problem traceability—whether a policy problem itself can be linked to elite actions. By contrast, prospective voters are indifferent to both forms of traceability. With respect to other policy attributes, elites and mass publics share similar preferences. Our results provide support for a previously untested theory of policymaking and describe the nature of strategic decision-making by legislators.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47672,"journal":{"name":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","volume":"50 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145272125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do Your Job, Keep Your Seat: The Causal Effect of MPs' Legislation on Reelection 做好你的工作,保住你的席位:国会议员立法对连任的因果效应
IF 2.4 3区 社会学
Legislative Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-10-02 DOI: 10.1111/lsq.70037
Serika Atsumi
{"title":"Do Your Job, Keep Your Seat: The Causal Effect of MPs' Legislation on Reelection","authors":"Serika Atsumi","doi":"10.1111/lsq.70037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.70037","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Distinguishing between personal and party votes is inherently challenging, and it remains unclear to what extent they function in each country. This study employs the ballot of a private member's bill as an instrumental variable to examine whether legislative behavior influences electoral outcomes in the United Kingdom, which has a highly institutionalized party system. The findings reveal that legislative behavior increases the vote share of Conservative MPs by 2.6 percentage points compared to the previous election. However, given the high prominence of the party vote, this increase is only large enough to change the electoral winner in just under 10% of the constituencies. Furthermore, for opposition MPs, legislative behavior had no effect in any respect. Nevertheless, this result suggests that personal votes exist even in an unlikely case—when party competition is intense and MPs have limited autonomy in Parliament.</p>","PeriodicalId":47672,"journal":{"name":"Legislative Studies Quarterly","volume":"50 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lsq.70037","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145223874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书