Gesundheitswesen最新文献

{"title":"Implementation of a telemedical urgency assessment procedure in the pediatric emergency room: evaluation results.","authors":"Angelika Beyer, Kilson Moon, Thomas Hirsch, Holger N Lode, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Neeltje van den Berg","doi":"10.1055/a-2325-0194","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2325-0194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In rural areas in Germany, the number of emergency departments with pediatric expertise decreases. Telemedicine solutions are used sporadically, but they lack certain parameters for assessing a child's health status, such as touch and smell. We tested and evaluated the implementation of a telemedical, cross-hospital urgency assessment in pediatric emergency rooms. The telemedical urgency assessments were carried out via video conferences and were compared to the usual on-site procedure. Primary results of the concordance analysis have been published elsewhere. This work describes the results of the evaluation of the implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The telemedical urgency assessment was carried out in 5 pediatric emergency departments during the years 2015-2019. Various methods were used to evaluate the implementation. The following reports are based on (a) a parent questionnaire with two statements to be evaluated (entire project duration), (b) a survey of the physicians using telemedicine after each case (entire project duration) and (c) detailed process documentation (July 2017 until end of the project).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 266 patients under 18 years old, recruited from four hospitals, were included in the study. (a) 210 parents completed the questionnaire. 78% of the parents felt adequately cared for and 70% could imagine telemedicine becoming established as a future supplementary care procedure. (b) The physicians' questionnaires for the telemedicine site were completed in 232 cases (87%). The average satisfaction rating was 1.8 on a 6-point-likert-scale (95% confidence interval: 1.64; 1.95). (c) The most frequent implementation problem concerned the technical implementation of the video conference. The evaluation of the accompanying documentation revealed in particular implementation barriers in the technical area (e. g. limited video and/or audio quality) and in the provision of human resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite implementation barriers, the project showed that telemedical urgency assessment in acute pediatric care is a promising option for supporting care. Most of the participating clinicians needed a high level of support, which in some cases indicated a rather low level of digital competence. Increasing acceptance of telemedicine functionalities requires changes in society as a whole with improved framework conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140917231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Health Care Research & Implementation.","authors":"Wolfgang Hoffmann, Martin Härter","doi":"10.1055/a-2356-2053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2356-2053","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141989152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[WHO guideline on carbohydrate intake for adults and children].","authors":"Isolde Sommer, Barbara Nußbaumer-Streit, Gerald Gartlehner","doi":"10.1055/a-2364-2388","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2364-2388","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Noncommunicable diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide. Unhealthy diets are a major risk factor. Among other dietary factors, poorer quality of carbohydrates in the diet is associated with an increased risk of NCDs. The proportion of dietary fibre is a particularly important indicator of the quality of carbohydrate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this World Health Organization (WHO)guideline is to provide guidance on carbohydrate intake, including dietary fibre and healthy food sources of carbohydrates.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This guideline was developed following the WHO Manual for Guideline Development. The process includes a review of systematically gathered evidence by an international, multidisciplinary group of experts, an assessment of the confidence in this evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach, and the consideration of additional factors when translating the evidence into recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of seven systematic reviews inform the formulation of carbohydrate intake recommendations. The WHO recommends that carbohydrate intake should consist primarily of whole grains, vegetables, fruits and legumes. It also recommends an intake of at least 400 g of vegetables and fruit per day for adults and at least 250-400 g per day for children and young people, depending on their age. With regard to naturally occurring fiber, a daily intake of at least 25 g is recommended for adults and 15-25 g per day for children and adolescents, depending on age.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141581235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[How effective are non-pharmacological interventions for family caregivers? A systematic review with meta-analyses].","authors":"Patrick Janson, Chu-Wei Hung, Kristina Willeke, Dieter Frisch, Anne Berghöfer, Peter Heuschmann, Andreas Zapf, Manfred Wildner, Carolin Stupp, Thomas Keil","doi":"10.1055/a-2340-1560","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2340-1560","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Informal caregiving is associated with mental disorders and reduced quality of life. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the results of methodologically high-quality intervention studies on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on patient-relevant outcomes for family caregivers in Germany.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched three large scientific literature databases for intervention studies with a control group and a low or moderate risk of bias on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for family caregivers in Germany.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Among 4,376 publications reviewed, 10 intervention studies with good methodological quality were identified. These investigated multi-component interventions or cognitive behavioral therapy for family caregivers of people with dementia (8 studies), stroke (1 study) and with general care dependency (1 study). The control groups received information material as a minimal intervention or usual standard care. Meta-analyses showed a statistically significant slight reduction in depressive symptoms 3-6 months after the start of the study as a result of cognitive behavioral therapy (standardized mean difference -0.27; 95% confidence interval -0.44 - -0.10), but this no longer reached statistical significance after 9-12 months (-0.21; -0.51 - 0.09). Multi-component interventions showed no changes in depressive symptoms either after 3-6 or after 9-12 months (-0.18; -0.40 - 0.03 and -0.14; -0.47 - 0.14, respectively). In contrast, the mental component of quality of life of family caregivers improved statistically significantly in the multi-component intervention groups compared to the control groups: slightly after 3-6 months (0.28; 0.01 - 0.56) and moderately after 9-12 months (0.45; 0.09 - 0.82). The interventions had no effect on the physical component of quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reduction of depressive symptoms by behavioral therapy interventions for family caregivers appears to be only slight and not sustainable. The mental component of quality of life of people affected may be improved in the longer term by multi-component interventions. Current scientifically examined interventions for informal caregivers do not appear to have a sufficient and sustainable effect. Greater effects could possibly be achieved through more elaborate behavioral approaches, but also structural preventive measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141989134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Introduction of ICD-11 in Germany: Seizing opportunities together.","authors":"Karl Broich, Johanna Callhoff, Peter Kaskel, Christoph Kowalski, Jürgen Malzahn, Christine Mundlos, Christoph Schöbel","doi":"10.1055/a-2342-4453","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2342-4453","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the new ICD-11 developed by the WHO and translated into German for use in Germany by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, the German healthcare system is facing a change that is more than a simple change of a medical coding system. The ICD-11 modernises the coding system, for example, by including new, separate health conditions such as sleep-wake disorders and conditions related to sexual health, thus making the corresponding diseases more visible. The ICD-11 is more precise than the ICD-10: it allows cross-referencing between diagnoses, symptoms, functionality and locations and partially abandons the strict hierarchy of the ICD-10. In addition, a greater number of rare diseases are represented with their own specific code than was previously possible with ICD-10. Finally, the ICD-11 is also significantly more \"modern\" than the ICD-10 (which dates back to pre-digital times) in that it enables new, digitally-supported processes, such as keywords flexibility and sustainability when updating the system as well as actual coding at the point of care. The switch to ICD-11 can be a great opportunity for the German healthcare system that should not be missed. It will benefit health service research, which at best will be able to work with much more detailed and correct data sets. But medical care will also benefit because the ICD-11 reflects current medical knowledge. In addition, certain illnesses will be removed from the psychiatric category, meaning that those affected will no longer be stigmatised by their classification in the ICD. The improved coding of diagnoses will ultimately also support guideline-based treatments. However, the changeover is only the first step. The challenges - also for health service research - include in particular the latency of introduction and uniform use as well as the necessary change in coding habits. For ICD-11 to be a success in Germany, authorities, the medical profession, payers and patients must work together on strategies to ensure not only a rapid but also a comprehensive implementation that maximises the potential of ICD-11.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141307132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[Patient safety in the Innovation Fund - Characterization, results and evaluation of completed projects: Results of a scoping review].","authors":"Lorenz Harst, Felix Walther, Lilly Rüthrich, Laura Keßler, Christina Lindemann, Martin Härter, Erik Farin-Glattacker, Max Geraedts, Jochen Schmitt","doi":"10.1055/a-2309-8968","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2309-8968","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The German Innovation Fund has funded various studies on patient safety. Their thematic spectrum, methodological quality, results and recommendations of the Innovation committee were to be systematically investigated in order to derive proposals for optimizing transfer success. As part of a scoping review, all Innovation Fund projects funded in the period 2016-02/2023 with a focus on patient safety were analyzed. Each included study document was critically reviewed by two independent persons. The 16 included projects addressed a wide range of populations, indications and interventions. The study quality was mostly good. The results ranged from feasible indicator sets and the prevention of adverse drug reactions to the optimization of error management. For seven projects, the Innovation Committee recommended forwarding the results to healthcare institutions with the request that they take note and/or examine the feasibility of implementation in standard care. Implementation, however, has not yet taken place. In order to facilitate implementation, the joint development of an implementation strategy by the recipients of the Innovation Committee's recommendations is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141989151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Shifting from Theoretical Best Evidence to Practical Best Evidence: an Approach to Overcome Structural Conservatism of Evidence-Based Medicine and Health Policy.","authors":"Holger Pfaff, Jochen Schmitt","doi":"10.1055/a-2350-6435","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2350-6435","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is disparity in the healthcare sector between the extent of innovation in medical products (e. g., drugs) and healthcare structures. The reason is not a lack of ideas, concepts, or (quasi-) experimental studies on structural innovations. Instead, we argue that the slow implementation of structural innovations has created this disparity partly because evidence-based medicine (EBM) instruments are well suited to evaluate product innovations but less suited to evaluate structural innovations. This article argues that the unintentional interplay between EBM, which has changed significantly over time to become primarily theoretical, on the one hand, and caution and inertia in health policy, on the other, has resulted in structural conservatism. Structural conservatism is present when healthcare structures persistently and essentially resist innovation. We interpret this phenomenon as an unintended consequence of deliberate EBM action. Therefore, we propose a new assessment framework to respond to structural innovations in healthcare, centered on the differentiation between the theoretical best (possible) evidence, the practical best (possible) evidence, and the best available evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141989153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Lässt sich der SARS-CoV-2-Infektionsstatus bei Kindern über pandemiebezogene Einstellungen und Sorgen ihrer Eltern vorhersagen? Daten der Würzburger Kindertagesstätten-Studien (Wü-KiTa-CoV, 2020-2022).","authors":"Thomas Jans, Maike Krauthausen, Carsten Bauer, Johannes Forster, Geraldine Engels, Franziska Pietsch, Julia Wallstabe, Victoria Rücker, Julia Schmidt, Benedikt Weissbrich, Peter Heuschmann, Christoph Härtel, Lars Dölken, Oliver Kurzai, Ildikó Gágyor, Johannes G Liese, Marcel Romanos, Andrea Streng","doi":"10.1055/a-2386-4490","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2386-4490","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141976928","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[Potential of a Telemedical, Inpatient-Outpatient Care Concept to Improve the Quality of Healthcare from the User's Perspective - An Acceptance Analysis of the TELnet@NRW Study].","authors":"Carolin Schmidhuber, Veronika Strotbaum, Rainer Beckers, Annette Hempen, Carina Benstöm, Gernot Marx, Sandra Dohmen","doi":"10.1055/a-2348-3136","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2348-3136","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to measure the acceptance of a telemedical, inpatient-outpatient care concept by physicians, patients and the relatives of patients. Based on a quantitative survey of acceptance, both the potential and success factors influencing the use of telemedicine were to be highlighted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TELnet@NRW study is a national, multicenter, cluster-randomized study in stepped-wedge design conducted from February 2017 to January 2020 for the purpose of documenting changes in the quality of care through telemedicine in an inpatient-outpatient network. Consultations were focused on intensive care medicine and infectious diseases. This current study used questionnaires for specific groups of patients to determine acceptance of the telemedical care concept practiced in the main study. The survey was anonymously conducted once in either digital or paper-based form during the reporting period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The answers of 126 questionnaires from physicians and 1686 questionnaires from patients and their relatives were evaluated. The physicians of both sectors attributed high potential (up to 88.4%) for telemedicine to improve guideline-adherent treatment. A trustworthy and appreciative communication during the telemedical consultation represented a positively reinforcing success factor. The additional workload generated by telemedicine inhibited acceptance, especially in the inpatient sector. A continuation of telemedicine beyond the end of the project was supported by the majority of surveyed physicians (inpatient 60.6%, outpatient 82.1%) as well as in patients and their relatives (inpatient 79.7%, outpatient 57.4%) in both sectors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is widespread acceptance of telemedical, inpatient-outpatient care concepts among physicians, patients and their relatives. Low-effort processes and user-centered technology are crucial to increase the rate of use. Telemedicine has the potential to improve the quality of care and can serve as a robust component of sustainable healthcare in Germany.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[Digital Healthcare: Requirements for a Successful Transformation].","authors":"Oliver Steidle, Kerstin Rego, Thomas Petzold","doi":"10.1055/a-2184-5572","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2184-5572","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Digital transformation of healthcare is the dominating discussion topic for all healthcare stakeholders. Digital transformation encompasses all areas of healthcare and is far more than digital healthcare applications (DiGA), digital care applications (DiPA), telemedicine applications, telematics infrastructure activities, and applications from the fields of eHealth, mHealth, or Telehealth. All existing care processes and structures in the healthcare system are undergoing an inventory in order to transfer analog components of care into a digital context. The digital transformation is not taking place exclusively in economic sectors such as healthcare, but is a process of change throughout society in the collection, use, provision, linking and evaluation of information (=data). For the healthcare sector, it is clear that different technical concepts are used, while digital healthcare takes place in different places and at different times, may include different user (groups) and retains, expands or changes the healthcare context. Established healthcare functions such as diagnostics, therapy, documentation and the management of healthcare services are retained and transferred to a digital context. In addition, new application areas will emerge, such as the overarching access to health data by different actors, real-time-driven monitoring systems of holistic health data, (clinical) decision systems, or the provision of data for health services. Even if the majority of the digital transformation has not yet taken place, it is assumed that these functions and application areas of healthcare will serve to sustainably improve the quality of care and benefit the well-being of all (future) patients. For the transfer of existing processes into a digital context and the establishment of new application areas, there are prerequisites for healthcare institutions and the healthcare system itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139503082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}