[History of ideas and psychiatric reform: Italy, Great Britain and Germany].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Thomas Becker, Stefan Weinmann, Uta Gühne
{"title":"[History of ideas and psychiatric reform: Italy, Great Britain and Germany].","authors":"Thomas Becker, Stefan Weinmann, Uta Gühne","doi":"10.1055/a-2560-1372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ideas and societal structure interact. This paper focuses on relationships between the history of ideas and mental health reform in Italy, Great Britain and Germany. The Italian reform process is based on the ideas of Jean-Paul Sartre, Michel Foucault, phenomenology and Antonio Gramsci, with issues of human rights and social inclusion taking central stage; diagnostic concepts are (temporarily) put in brackets. In Great Britain, there is a strong tradition of empiricism coupled with Erving Goffman's institutional critique and analysis, evangelical (and Quaker) traditions of 'pauper and lunacy' politics, and high-quality evaluation of services. In (the Federal Republic of) Germany, Foucault, Goffman, anthropological-phenomenological psychiatry and international impulses are relevant. With its radical institutional critique and transformation towards comprehensive community care (in the face of tight finances), Italy's mental health reforms are impressive. In Great Britain there is a long-term orientation towards community mental health care, evidence-based services and a focus on patient rights (mixed with neoliberal elements in recent decades). In Germany, mental hospital reform was carried out based on the recommendations of a national Psychiatric Enquiry (White Paper, Psychiatrie-Enquête, 1975) but large psychiatric institutions are not closed, community psychiatric transformation is delayed. There is a recent surge of integrated care models with flexibility of care provision across the inpatient-community divide.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2560-1372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ideas and societal structure interact. This paper focuses on relationships between the history of ideas and mental health reform in Italy, Great Britain and Germany. The Italian reform process is based on the ideas of Jean-Paul Sartre, Michel Foucault, phenomenology and Antonio Gramsci, with issues of human rights and social inclusion taking central stage; diagnostic concepts are (temporarily) put in brackets. In Great Britain, there is a strong tradition of empiricism coupled with Erving Goffman's institutional critique and analysis, evangelical (and Quaker) traditions of 'pauper and lunacy' politics, and high-quality evaluation of services. In (the Federal Republic of) Germany, Foucault, Goffman, anthropological-phenomenological psychiatry and international impulses are relevant. With its radical institutional critique and transformation towards comprehensive community care (in the face of tight finances), Italy's mental health reforms are impressive. In Great Britain there is a long-term orientation towards community mental health care, evidence-based services and a focus on patient rights (mixed with neoliberal elements in recent decades). In Germany, mental hospital reform was carried out based on the recommendations of a national Psychiatric Enquiry (White Paper, Psychiatrie-Enquête, 1975) but large psychiatric institutions are not closed, community psychiatric transformation is delayed. There is a recent surge of integrated care models with flexibility of care provision across the inpatient-community divide.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信