[患者和人群参与医疗保健系统:关于(不)全面调查的可能性]。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Daniela Rojatz, Anna-Kristina Wahl
{"title":"[患者和人群参与医疗保健系统:关于(不)全面调查的可能性]。","authors":"Daniela Rojatz, Anna-Kristina Wahl","doi":"10.1055/a-2606-2053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In its resolution on social participation, the World Health Assembly called on member states to involve patients and the population in decision-making processes in the healthcare system. Furthermore, the resolution calls for the monitoring of participation processes. The survey of examples of participation in the context of health, which was carried out in 2023, comes closest to such monitoring for Austria. The article summarises lessons learned from the survey.The learning experiences are based on the analysis of process-produced data from a questionnaire survey on examples of patient and population participation in the healthcare system commissioned by the Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection in Austria. Data included were pretest results, workshop protocols to reflect on the survey instrument and results as well as limitations in the survey report. The contents of the documents included were paraphrased and analysed thematically.The results of the questionnaire survey showed that central to the planning and implementation of a survey were (1) the objective of the survey, including clarification of the objective and the areas to be covered, (2) the target group, including clarification of the target group and requirements adapted to it, and (3) reaching the target group, including motivators, choice of words and dissemination channels. The learning experiences were summarised in ten key questions for the development of similar survey instruments.A survey of examples of participation is possible and provides an overview of which groups are involved in which areas and how. Without concrete specifications as to which groups should be involved, the survey remains exploratory and does not allow any conclusions to be drawn about representativeness. The design of the survey is also caught between breadth (short questionnaire with potentially high response rate) and depth (long questionnaire with lower response rate). The checklist presented here is intended to support similar surveys. Without an orientation framework as to where participation should take place and who acts as the contact person for these processes, such surveys remain exploratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Patient and population participation in the healthcare system: On the (im)possibility of a comprehensive survey].\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Rojatz, Anna-Kristina Wahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2606-2053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In its resolution on social participation, the World Health Assembly called on member states to involve patients and the population in decision-making processes in the healthcare system. Furthermore, the resolution calls for the monitoring of participation processes. The survey of examples of participation in the context of health, which was carried out in 2023, comes closest to such monitoring for Austria. The article summarises lessons learned from the survey.The learning experiences are based on the analysis of process-produced data from a questionnaire survey on examples of patient and population participation in the healthcare system commissioned by the Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection in Austria. Data included were pretest results, workshop protocols to reflect on the survey instrument and results as well as limitations in the survey report. The contents of the documents included were paraphrased and analysed thematically.The results of the questionnaire survey showed that central to the planning and implementation of a survey were (1) the objective of the survey, including clarification of the objective and the areas to be covered, (2) the target group, including clarification of the target group and requirements adapted to it, and (3) reaching the target group, including motivators, choice of words and dissemination channels. The learning experiences were summarised in ten key questions for the development of similar survey instruments.A survey of examples of participation is possible and provides an overview of which groups are involved in which areas and how. Without concrete specifications as to which groups should be involved, the survey remains exploratory and does not allow any conclusions to be drawn about representativeness. The design of the survey is also caught between breadth (short questionnaire with potentially high response rate) and depth (long questionnaire with lower response rate). The checklist presented here is intended to support similar surveys. Without an orientation framework as to where participation should take place and who acts as the contact person for these processes, such surveys remain exploratory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gesundheitswesen\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gesundheitswesen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2606-2053\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2606-2053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界卫生大会在其关于社会参与的决议中呼吁会员国让患者和全体人民参与卫生保健系统的决策过程。此外,该决议要求监测参与进程。2023年开展的卫生领域参与实例调查最接近奥地利的这种监测情况。这篇文章总结了从调查中吸取的教训。学习经验的基础是对奥地利联邦社会事务、卫生、护理和消费者保护部委托进行的一项关于患者和人口参与保健系统实例的问卷调查过程中产生的数据进行分析。数据包括预测结果、反映调查工具和结果的车间协议以及调查报告中的局限性。所包括的文件的内容被改写并按主题进行了分析。问卷调查的结果表明,计划和实施调查的核心是(1)调查的目的,包括澄清目的和要涵盖的领域;(2)目标群体,包括澄清目标群体和与之相适应的要求;(3)达到目标群体,包括激励因素、词语的选择和传播渠道。学习经验总结为发展类似调查工具的十个关键问题。可以对参与的例子进行调查,并概述哪些群体参与了哪些领域以及如何参与。由于没有具体说明应涉及哪些群体,调查仍然是探索性的,不能就代表性得出任何结论。调查的设计也被夹在广度(可能有高回复率的短问卷)和深度(回复率较低的长问卷)之间。这里提供的清单旨在支持类似的调查。如果没有一个关于应该在哪里参与以及谁作为这些进程的联络人的介绍框架,这种调查仍然是探索性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Patient and population participation in the healthcare system: On the (im)possibility of a comprehensive survey].

In its resolution on social participation, the World Health Assembly called on member states to involve patients and the population in decision-making processes in the healthcare system. Furthermore, the resolution calls for the monitoring of participation processes. The survey of examples of participation in the context of health, which was carried out in 2023, comes closest to such monitoring for Austria. The article summarises lessons learned from the survey.The learning experiences are based on the analysis of process-produced data from a questionnaire survey on examples of patient and population participation in the healthcare system commissioned by the Federal Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection in Austria. Data included were pretest results, workshop protocols to reflect on the survey instrument and results as well as limitations in the survey report. The contents of the documents included were paraphrased and analysed thematically.The results of the questionnaire survey showed that central to the planning and implementation of a survey were (1) the objective of the survey, including clarification of the objective and the areas to be covered, (2) the target group, including clarification of the target group and requirements adapted to it, and (3) reaching the target group, including motivators, choice of words and dissemination channels. The learning experiences were summarised in ten key questions for the development of similar survey instruments.A survey of examples of participation is possible and provides an overview of which groups are involved in which areas and how. Without concrete specifications as to which groups should be involved, the survey remains exploratory and does not allow any conclusions to be drawn about representativeness. The design of the survey is also caught between breadth (short questionnaire with potentially high response rate) and depth (long questionnaire with lower response rate). The checklist presented here is intended to support similar surveys. Without an orientation framework as to where participation should take place and who acts as the contact person for these processes, such surveys remain exploratory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信