European Review of Social Psychology最新文献_第9页

Doing emotions: The role of culture in everyday emotions 做情绪:文化在日常情绪中的作用

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2017.1329107

B. Mesquita, M. Boiger, Jozefien De Leersnyder

引用次数: 54

A motivational perspective on punishment in social dilemmas 社会困境中惩罚的动机视角

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2017.1375662

Stefan Pfattheicher, J. Keller

引用次数: 3

Disgust as embodied loss aversion 厌恶体现为对损失的厌恶

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2016.1259844

S. Schnall

引用次数: 49

Creating shared reality in interpersonal and intergroup communication: the role of epistemic processes and their interplay 在人际和群体间交流中创造共同的现实：认识过程的作用及其相互作用

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2017.1333315

G. Echterhoff, E. Higgins

引用次数: 53

Stereotypes as Pseudocontingencies 作为伪偶然事件的刻板印象

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2016.1260238

F. Kutzner, K. Fiedler

引用次数: 8

Visualising mental representations: A primer on noise-based reverse correlation in social psychology 可视化心理表征:社会心理学中基于噪声的反向相关初探

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2017.1381469

Loek Brinkman, Alexander Todorov, R. Dotsch

引用次数: 64

Suppress for success? Exploring the contexts in which expressing positive emotion can have social costs 为了成功而压抑?探索表达积极情绪可能产生社会成本的情境

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2017.1331874

Katharine H. Greenaway, E. Kalokerinos

{"title":"Suppress for success? Exploring the contexts in which expressing positive emotion can have social costs","authors":"Katharine H. Greenaway, E. Kalokerinos","doi":"10.1080/10463283.2017.1331874","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2017.1331874","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Researchers and lay people alike have tended to focus on social benefits of expressing positive emotion and, as a result, tend to overlook potential social costs. In this paper, we consider limits to the idea that expressing positive emotion is universally beneficial and review literature demonstrating that, in some contexts, expressing positive emotion can have social costs. Building on our own and others’ work in this space, we outline three sociocontextual factors that influence the social success of positive emotion expression: To avoid potential costs, we suggest that positive emotion should generally be expressed in the right situation, by (and to) the right person, and in the right way. Where positive emotion expression may incur social costs, we propose people can effectively down-regulate positive emotion through use of expressive suppression, and review literature demonstrating that there can be social benefits to down-regulating positive emotion. This review advances theorising on the importance of considering context when seeking to understand socially successful emotion expression and regulation.","PeriodicalId":47582,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Social Psychology","volume":"28 1","pages":"134 - 174"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10463283.2017.1331874","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47891511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 27

The question-behaviour effect: A theoretical and methodological review and meta-analysis 问题-行为效应:理论和方法回顾及元分析

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2016.1245940

S. Wilding, M. Conner, Tracy Sandberg, A. Prestwich, R. Lawton, Chantelle Wood, E. Miles, G. Godin, P. Sheeran

{"title":"The question-behaviour effect: A theoretical and methodological review and meta-analysis","authors":"S. Wilding, M. Conner, Tracy Sandberg, A. Prestwich, R. Lawton, Chantelle Wood, E. Miles, G. Godin, P. Sheeran","doi":"10.1080/10463283.2016.1245940","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2016.1245940","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research has demonstrated that asking people questions about a behaviour can lead to behaviour change. Despite many, varied studies in different domains, it is only recently that this phenomenon has been studied under the umbrella term of the question-behaviour effect (QBE) and moderators of the effect have been investigated. With a particular focus on our own contributions, this article: (1) provides an overview of QBE research; (2) reviews and offers new evidence concerning three theoretical accounts of the QBE (behavioural simulation and processing fluency; attitude accessibility; cognitive dissonance); (3) reports a new meta-analysis of QBE studies (k = 66, reporting 94 tests) focusing on methodological moderators. The findings of this meta-analysis support a small significant effect of the QBE (g = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.11, 0.18, p < .001) with smaller effect sizes observed in more carefully controlled studies that exhibit less risk of bias and (4) also considers directions for future research on the QBE, especially studies that use designs with low risk of bias and consider desirable and undesirable behaviour separately.","PeriodicalId":47582,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Social Psychology","volume":"27 1","pages":"196 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10463283.2016.1245940","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59674641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 65

Changing people’s views of outgroups through individual-to-group generalisation: meta-analytic reviews and theoretical considerations 通过个体到群体的概括改变人们对外群体的看法:元分析综述和理论考虑

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2016.1201893

Kylie McIntyre, Stefania Paolini, M. Hewstone

{"title":"Changing people’s views of outgroups through individual-to-group generalisation: meta-analytic reviews and theoretical considerations","authors":"Kylie McIntyre, Stefania Paolini, M. Hewstone","doi":"10.1080/10463283.2016.1201893","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2016.1201893","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Through individual-to-group generalisation, information about individual members of stigmatised social groups changes the outgroup judgment. This article reports meta-analytic reviews of over 30 years of experimental, lab-based research on individual-to-group generalisation (107 independent tests; 5393 participants). In a first meta-analysis, a positive, medium-size generalisation effect was detected (r = .28, p < .001), reflecting significant generalisation of outgroup exemplar information to the outgroup judgment. This effect was moderated by the number of exemplars and exemplar typicality, with more moderately atypical exemplars maximising generalisation effects. Several other design parameters—including type of control condition, generalisation measures, mode of information provision, type of target outgroup and origin of study—did not moderate the positive generalisation effect. A second meta-analysis investigated the interplay between metacognitions and generalisation and found assimilation effects with metacognitive triggers encouraging exemplar inclusion, and contrast effects with metacognitive cues encouraging exemplar exclusion. These results demonstrate that the same outgroup exemplar can lead to bias reduction or bias exacerbation, depending on available meta-cognitive cues. Findings are discussed in terms of implications for intergroup psychology, generalisation theory and bias reduction interventions.","PeriodicalId":47582,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Social Psychology","volume":"27 1","pages":"115 - 63"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10463283.2016.1201893","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59675066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 31

Cooperation in repeated interactions: A systematic review of Centipede game experiments, 1992–2016 重复互动中的合作:1992-2016年蜈蚣游戏实验的系统回顾

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2016.1249640

E. Krockow, A. Colman, B. Pulford

{"title":"Cooperation in repeated interactions: A systematic review of Centipede game experiments, 1992–2016","authors":"E. Krockow, A. Colman, B. Pulford","doi":"10.1080/10463283.2016.1249640","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2016.1249640","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Cooperation is a fundamental form of social interaction, and turn-taking reciprocity one of its most familiar manifestations. The Centipede game provides a formal model of such alternating reciprocal cooperation, but a backward induction (BI) argument appears to prove logically that instrumentally rational players would never cooperate in this way. A systematic review of experimental research reveals that human decision makers cooperate frequently in this game, except under certain extreme conditions. Several game, situational, and individual difference variables have been investigated for their influence on cooperation. The most influential are aspects of the payoff function (especially the social gain from cooperation and the risk associated with a cooperative move), the number of players, repetitions of the game, group vs. individual decisions, and players’ social value orientations (SVOs). Our review of experimental evidence suggests that other-regarding preferences, including prosocial behavioural dispositions and collective rationality, provide the most powerful explanation for cooperation.","PeriodicalId":47582,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Social Psychology","volume":"27 1","pages":"231 - 282"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10463283.2016.1249640","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59674698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 24