European Review of Social Psychology最新文献_第8页

From crisis of evidence to a “crisis” of relevance? Incentive-based answers for social psychology’s perennial relevance worries 从证据危机到相关性“危机”？基于激励的社会心理学长期相关性担忧答案

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2018-08-24 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1542902

Roger Giner-Sorolla

{"title":"From crisis of evidence to a “crisis” of relevance? Incentive-based answers for social psychology’s perennial relevance worries","authors":"Roger Giner-Sorolla","doi":"10.1080/10463283.2018.1542902","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1542902","url":null,"abstract":"Current controversies in social psychology have sparked the promotion of new rules for evidence in the field. This “crisis of evidence” echoes prior concerns from the 1970’s “crisis of social psychology”, with such issues as replication and statistical significance once more under examination. I argue that parallel concerns about the relevance of our research, raised but not completely resolved in the 1970’s crisis, also deserve a fresh look. In particular, the advances made in the current crisis of evidence came about because of changes in academic career incentives--particularly publishing. Today, many voices in psychology urge greater respect for relevance in topics, methods and communication, but the lack of clear and concrete incentives to do so has stood in the way of answers. I diagnose the current incentive structures, propose partial solutions that are within the reach of journal editors and professional societies, and conclude by discussing the links between relevance and evidence, as well as special challenges to the relevance of social psychology post-2016.","PeriodicalId":47582,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2018-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10463283.2018.1542902","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44911423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 21

Objectifying objectification: When and why people are cognitively reduced to their parts akin to objects 客观化:人们在什么时候以及为什么在认知上被还原为与物体相似的部分

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1471949

P. Bernard, S. Gervais, O. Klein

引用次数: 26

Confirmation as coping with competition 确认是应对竞争

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1539908

F. Butera, N. Sommet, Claudia Toma

引用次数: 5

An experimental approach to Intergroup Threat Theory: Manipulations, moderators, and consequences of realistic vs. symbolic threat 群体间威胁理论的实验方法：现实威胁与象征威胁的操纵、调节和后果

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1537049

Kimberly Rios, Nicholas Sosa, Hannah J. Osborn

引用次数: 74

The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: An integrative review 社会认同过程在大规模应急行为中的作用：一项综合综述

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1471948

J. Drury

引用次数: 189

Why conspiracy theories matter: A social psychological analysis 阴谋论为何重要：社会心理学分析

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1537428

Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton

{"title":"Why conspiracy theories matter: A social psychological analysis","authors":"Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton","doi":"10.1080/10463283.2018.1537428","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1537428","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although conspiracy theories have arguably always been an important feature of social life, they have only attracted the attention of social psychologists in recent years. The last decade, however, has seen an increase in social psychological research on this topic that has yielded many insights into the causes and consequences of conspiracy thinking. In this article, we draw on examples from our own programme of research to highlight how the methods and concepts of social psychology can be brought to bear on the study of conspiracy theories. Specifically, we highlight how basic social cognitive processes such as pattern perception, projection and agency detection predict the extent to which people believe in conspiracy theories. We then highlight the role of motivations such as the need for uniqueness, and the motivation to justify the system, in predicting the extent to which people adopt conspiracy explanations. We next discuss how conspiracy theories have important consequences for social life, such as decreasing engagement with politics and influencing people’s health and environmental decisions. Finally, we reflect on some of the limitations of research in this domain and consider some important avenues for future research.","PeriodicalId":47582,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10463283.2018.1537428","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48425012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 74

Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action 整合“我们”是谁与“我们”（不会）代表什么：集体行动社会身份模型的进一步延伸

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347

Martijn van Zomeren, Maja Kutlaca, Felicity M. Turner‐Zwinkels

{"title":"Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action","authors":"Martijn van Zomeren, Maja Kutlaca, Felicity M. Turner‐Zwinkels","doi":"10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Collective action refers to any action that individuals undertake as group members to pursue group goals such as social change. In this chapter, we further extend the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (SIMCA) by including not just (politicised) identity but also moral motivations into its core, effectively integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for. Conceptually, we utilise self-categorisation theory’s notion of normative fit to elaborate this special relationship between the moral and identity motivations for collective action. Empirically, we review two research projects (the experimental and survey-based Value-Identity Fit Project and the longitudinal Politicisation Project) that both suggest that the SIMCA needs to be extended to include, both conceptually and empirically, a broader range of (violated) moral beliefs and a focus on identity content. We discuss key implications of expanding the core of the SIMCA for the social psychology of collective action and social change, and suggest new directions for future theorising and research in this field.","PeriodicalId":47582,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41436116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 122

Disparate roads to certainty processing strategy choices under need for closure 不同的道路确定处理策略选择需要关闭

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1493066

M. Kossowska, E. Szumowska, Piotr Dragon, Katarzyna Jaśko, A. Kruglanski

引用次数: 21

Stress and the stability of social systems: A review of neurophysiological research 压力与社会系统的稳定性:神经生理学研究综述

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1543149

D. Scheepers, N. Ellemers

引用次数: 13

To what degree do situational influences explain spontaneous helping behaviour? A meta-analysis 情境影响在多大程度上解释了自发的帮助行为？荟萃分析

IF 7.2 2区心理学

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2017.1367529

G. Tyler Lefevor, B. Fowers, Soyeon Ahn, Samantha F. Lang, Laura M. Cohen

{"title":"To what degree do situational influences explain spontaneous helping behaviour? A meta-analysis","authors":"G. Tyler Lefevor, B. Fowers, Soyeon Ahn, Samantha F. Lang, Laura M. Cohen","doi":"10.1080/10463283.2017.1367529","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2017.1367529","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Prosocial behaviour is an interdisciplinary topic, involving psychologists, philosophers, and educators. Based on experimental helping research, some moral philosophers have claimed that helping behaviour is entirely situationally determined. The dominance of situational factor experimentation gives the appearance that situational factors alone can explain helping behaviour. This meta-analysis investigated situational explanations of helping behaviour with 286 effects and 46,705 participants from experimental studies with non-manipulation control groups, and observed unilateral adult behavioural helping. Results indicated expected group differences in helping behaviour frequency among help encouraging or help discouraging experimental conditions and no-manipulation control conditions. Helping behaviour was also frequent in help discouraging and control conditions and far from universal in help encouraging conditions. Because helping occurred in control groups, situational factors cannot explain all observed helping. Because helping was not universal in help encouraging conditions, it raises the question of individual differences in responsiveness to helping cues.","PeriodicalId":47582,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10463283.2017.1367529","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45331949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 24