Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action

IF 10.1 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347

Martijn van Zomeren, Maja Kutlaca, Felicity M. Turner‐Zwinkels

{"title":"Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action","authors":"Martijn van Zomeren, Maja Kutlaca, Felicity M. Turner‐Zwinkels","doi":"10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Collective action refers to any action that individuals undertake as group members to pursue group goals such as social change. In this chapter, we further extend the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (SIMCA) by including not just (politicised) identity but also moral motivations into its core, effectively integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for. Conceptually, we utilise self-categorisation theory’s notion of normative fit to elaborate this special relationship between the moral and identity motivations for collective action. Empirically, we review two research projects (the experimental and survey-based Value-Identity Fit Project and the longitudinal Politicisation Project) that both suggest that the SIMCA needs to be extended to include, both conceptually and empirically, a broader range of (violated) moral beliefs and a focus on identity content. We discuss key implications of expanding the core of the SIMCA for the social psychology of collective action and social change, and suggest new directions for future theorising and research in this field.","PeriodicalId":47582,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Social Psychology","volume":"29 1","pages":"122 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347","citationCount":"122","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2018.1479347","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 122

Abstract

ABSTRACT Collective action refers to any action that individuals undertake as group members to pursue group goals such as social change. In this chapter, we further extend the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (SIMCA) by including not just (politicised) identity but also moral motivations into its core, effectively integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for. Conceptually, we utilise self-categorisation theory’s notion of normative fit to elaborate this special relationship between the moral and identity motivations for collective action. Empirically, we review two research projects (the experimental and survey-based Value-Identity Fit Project and the longitudinal Politicisation Project) that both suggest that the SIMCA needs to be extended to include, both conceptually and empirically, a broader range of (violated) moral beliefs and a focus on identity content. We discuss key implications of expanding the core of the SIMCA for the social psychology of collective action and social change, and suggest new directions for future theorising and research in this field.

查看原文本刊更多论文

整合“我们”是谁与“我们”（不会）代表什么：集体行动社会身份模型的进一步延伸

集体行动是指个人作为群体成员为追求社会变革等群体目标而采取的任何行动。在本章中，我们进一步扩展了集体行动的社会身份模型（SIMCA），不仅将（政治化的）身份，还将道德动机纳入其核心，有效地将“我们”与“我们”（不会）所代表的内容相结合。从概念上讲，我们利用自我分类理论的规范性契合概念来阐述集体行动的道德动机和身份动机之间的这种特殊关系。从经验上讲，我们回顾了两个研究项目（基于实验和调查的价值-身份匹配项目和纵向政治化项目），这两个项目都表明，SIMCA需要在概念和经验上扩展，以包括更广泛的（被侵犯的）道德信仰和对身份内容的关注。我们讨论了扩展SIMCA核心对集体行动和社会变革的社会心理学的关键影响，并为该领域的未来理论和研究提出了新的方向。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Review of Social Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

15.30

自引率

2.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： The "European Review of Social Psychology (ERSP)" is a distinguished international journal that operates under the patronage of the European Association of Social Psychology. It serves as a platform for comprehensive, theory-driven reviews that cover the broad spectrum of social psychology. The journal is open to submissions from authors worldwide and is guided by a prestigious international editorial board. ERSP is particularly interested in publishing reviews that reflect the author's own research program, as demonstrated by their publications in leading peer-reviewed journals. The journal values theoretical contributions that are grounded in a substantial empirical foundation, situating the research within the broader context of existing literature and offering a synthesis that goes beyond the individual articles. In addition to these in-depth reviews, ERSP also welcomes conventional reviews and meta-analyses, further enriching the journal's offerings. By focusing on high-quality, evidence-based research, ERSP contributes significantly to the advancement of knowledge in social psychology and fosters a deeper understanding of human social behavior across cultures and societies.