{"title":"Predicting undergraduate student evaluations of teaching using probabilistic machine learning: The importance of motivational climate","authors":"Brett D. Jones , Kazim Topuz , Sumeyra Sahbaz","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101353","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101353","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this study was to understand the complex interactions within a course among motivational climate variables and student evaluations of teaching (SETs) by developing online simulators using probabilistic machine learning. We used data from 2938 undergraduate students in 30 classes to create online simulators based on Bayesian Belief Networks. We created bubble charts, line graphs, and radar charts to show the relationships between the study variables. Findings showed that (a) the motivational climate variables—as measured by the MUSIC Model of Motivation variables—are the largest predictors of SETs, (b) student interest (in the coursework and instructional methods) is the overall largest predictor of SETs, (c) the relationships between the motivational climate variables and SETS are nonlinear, (d) the ease of the course and demographic variables are only weakly associated with SETs, and (e) the largest predictors of instructor and course rating are similar, but somewhat different.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101353"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140321029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marian D. Ilie , Peter Van Petegem , Velibor Mladenovici , Laurenţiu P. Maricuţoiu
{"title":"Dynamics of change of academics’ teaching approaches: A latent profile transition analysis","authors":"Marian D. Ilie , Peter Van Petegem , Velibor Mladenovici , Laurenţiu P. Maricuţoiu","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101349","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101349","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Current studies highlighted a positive relationship between academics' learning-focused approaches to teaching and students' active and deep learning. Thus, scholars have an ongoing debate about the dynamics of change from academics’ content-focused to learning-focused approaches to teaching. Previous studies investigating this subject used variable-centered analyses (on cross-sectional or pre-post data) or person-centered analyses only on cross-sectional data. Such research approaches presented limited information about the dynamics of change in teaching approaches of naturally occurring subgroups of academics with multiple teaching approach characteristics. This study analyzed the issue using longitudinal data collected on three moments (N = 111 Romanian academics) and a person-centered approach (i.e., latent profile transition analysis). We identified three dissonant approaches to teaching and one learning-focused. Our results suggested that the process of change in approaches to teaching seems to be slow and, sometimes, discontinuous. The transition from the most dissonant approach to the learning-focused approach could occur directly or by intermediary steps described as less dissonant. These dynamics of change are similar across various subsamples defined by the academics’ teaching context, specialization, gender, teaching experience, and pedagogical training programs followed. We advanced several implications for designing pedagogical programs for academics and future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101349"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000282/pdfft?md5=fb5bcc9ba75e42928cc77fa37d363701&pid=1-s2.0-S0191491X24000282-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140309930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Learning analytics of peer feedback on communicative skills in an EFL course across different learning modalities","authors":"Tom Gorham , Rwitajit Majumdar , Hiroaki Ogata","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101352","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101352","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research investigates the improvement of communicative skills in university students via peer feedback activities in an English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) course. Utilizing a comprehensive view of contemporary feedback frameworks, the study engaged 320 students across three cohorts. The last two cohorts transitioned to online Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The final cohort further employed a prototype learning analytics system to enhance peer feedback skills. Answering calls for more research on authentic task-based learning in tech-mediated contexts, this study offers empirical evidence supporting modern feedback frameworks. Results showed that ERT cohorts, especially those using the prototype system, outperformed the face-to-face cohort in communicative speaking tests, highlighting the effectiveness of peer feedback activities in boosting communicative skills.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101352"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140296804","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Estimating teachers’ value-added effects using generalized persistence model","authors":"Ali Temurtaş , Derya Çobanoğlu Aktan","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101355","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One of the issues in value-added assessment of teachers is the persistence of effects. Although Generalized Persistence (GP) model addresses this issue, it is not commonly used because of the difficulty interpreting its results. The purpose of this study is to examine teachers’ value-added scores using the GP model and interpret the findings in terms of teacher assessment. Test scores of the same students (1432 students studying in 12 different middle schools) for three consecutive test administrations were used to estimate value-added scores of 61 science and 42 Turkish teachers. While correlation between current and future year value-added scores was high for science teachers (r = 0.88), it was lower for Turkish teachers (r = 0.46). On the other hand, the reliability of the estimates was found to be low. The study is concluded with suggestions for the use of the GP model and implications for further research and policy use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101355"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140180500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Carlton J. Fong , Diane L. Schallert , Shengjie Lin , Servet Altan
{"title":"How constructive is that feedback? Associations with undergraduates’ future time perspectives moderated by student characteristics’","authors":"Carlton J. Fong , Diane L. Schallert , Shengjie Lin , Servet Altan","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101351","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101351","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Beliefs about the future, instantiated as a learner’s future time perspective, have been largely overlooked in the research on the connection between feedback and motivation. Because feedback statements vary in their level of specificity and friendliness (a commonly reported distinction between peer-provided and instructor-provided feedback), we were interested in the interplay between such feedback characteristics and learners’ future time perspective. With 392 U.S. undergraduates, we investigated how future time perspective (specifically, its valence and connectedness) affected whether learners perceived as constructive feedback statements that varied in specificity and friendliness, and whether gender and academic discipline would influence these perceptions. Future time perspective connectedness was positively associated with perceptions of feedback constructiveness for specific statements but was negatively related to constructiveness for unspecific statements. Valence was positively correlated with feedback constructiveness for unspecific statements. Although no differences in academic discipline were found, gender effects emerged. Implications for peer feedback are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101351"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140164039","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supporting students to generate self-feedback: Critical reflections on the special issue","authors":"Fabienne Michelle Van der Kleij","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101348","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101348","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents a commentary on articles in the special issue entitled “Instructional Tools and Curricular Structures to Facilitate Students’ Generation of Self-feedback.” The articles explored the value of a diverse range of potential sources of feedback from the student perspective. Collectively, these articles highlight the potential of instructional tools and assessment resources in supporting students to generate self-feedback. Studies in this special issue also contribute innovative solutions to enable sustainable and effective feedback practices at scale, capitalising on technological advances. Overall, the findings amplify the importance of explicitly providing appropriate frames of reference such as rubrics, exemplars, and annotated exemplars, to support the generation of meaningful self-feedback. However, further research that makes the nature of self-feedback visible is needed. To progress research on self-feedback, I highlight the need for a strategic research agenda, as well as more sophisticated theoretical frameworks and fit-for-purpose methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101348"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140139122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Manja Attig , Frances Hoferichter , Isa Steinmann , Rolf Strietholt
{"title":"Teaching quality and student reading outcomes: Evidence from a longitudinal study from grade 5 to 7","authors":"Manja Attig , Frances Hoferichter , Isa Steinmann , Rolf Strietholt","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101347","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101347","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The literature on the effects of teaching behavior on student competence and motivation has primarily focused on single teaching facets, with limited attention to multiple components simultaneously. To address this gap, this study examined a model of teaching and learning by investigating 10 teaching quality components reported by both students and teachers. The study used a sample of 3067 students in 150 schools in Germany and regressed reading competence and attitudes towards reading in grade 7 on these 10 variables. The study controlled for prior reading competence and attitudes towards reading in grade 5, as well as other student background characteristics, and estimated school-fixed effects. The results did not identify significant associations between the investigated teaching quality components and the reading competence and attitudes towards reading measures when considered simultaneously in one model, after taking into account previous competence and attitudes. The study discusses limitations and implications of these findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101347"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X24000269/pdfft?md5=e0db1fa469e333c397e5fff546aea5d6&pid=1-s2.0-S0191491X24000269-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139999816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Assessing student learning in work-integrated learning (WIL): A systematic review on assessment methods and purposes","authors":"Lillian Yun Yung Luk , Cecilia K.Y. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101345","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101345","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Under increasing pressure from quality assurance and other accountability concerns, it is easy to fall into the trap of assessing students only for the sake of assessment. This review aims to help educators rethink assessment in work-integrated learning (WIL) courses with purpose in mind by identifying the assessment methods used to assess student learning in such courses over the last 20 years, together with the underlying purposes of assessment. Based on the analysis of 103 selected articles from four databases and additional searching, 22 assessment methods and seven broad categories of assessment purposes were identified. One key finding is that the assessment of student learning in WIL courses outlined in the results was mainly implemented as assessment for learning to support students’ development as self-regulated, lifelong learners. Based on this finding, we propose three assessment design principles for self-regulated learning with recommendations on how to utilize different assessment methods to their fullest potential in preparing students for their futures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101345"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139993607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Strengths intervention imparted through a blended learning approach to advance personal growth initiative among Pakistan’s university students during COVID-19","authors":"Zane Asher Green","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101343","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101343","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To enhance the teaching-learning process and protect all concerned during COVID-19, a blended learning approach—comprising online learning as well as offline personal and collaborative learning—was used to impart a strengths intervention to foster personal growth initiative (PGI) among Pakistan’s university students. The sample comprised 176 students randomly allocated to a treatment (<em>n</em> = 88) and a wait-list control (<em>n</em> = 88) group. Growth curve modeling analyzed the developmental changes in participants’ PGI scores over time. PGI increased to a greater extent in the treatment group than in the control group immediately after the intervention as well as four and eight months later. There were also significant changes in students’ initial status (intercepts) and rates of changes over time (slopes). Moreover, students with high initial PGI scores had a slower linear increase, whereas those with low initial PGI scores had a faster increase in linear growth over time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101343"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139986414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lin Li, Han Liu, Yupan Kang, Yaojiang Shi, Zijian Zhao
{"title":"The influence of parental involvement on students’ non-cognitive abilities in rural ethnic regions of northwest China","authors":"Lin Li, Han Liu, Yupan Kang, Yaojiang Shi, Zijian Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101344","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101344","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The development of children’s non-cognitive abilities is crucial for both individuals and society as a whole. In this study, using a follow-up survey on 5369 primary students in rural ethnic regions of northwest China, we aim to examine the levels of parental involvement in rural ethnic regions and investigate its effect on students’ non-cognitive abilities. Our results show the following: first, parental involvement in rural ethnic regions of northwest China is quite low. Parents pay more attention to their children’s academic performance than to their non-cognitive abilities and the personal involvement is seriously lacking. Second, students from families with more favorable economic status, high parental education levels, non-migrant parents, and primary caregivers who are parents experience higher levels of parental involvement. Though Han students generally have higher maternal involvement and lower paternal involvement than minorities, the ethnic differences are reduced after controlling the covariates. Third, using the value-added model, after controlling for individual, family, class, county and baseline variables, we find that maternal behavioral and personal involvement and paternal cognitive and behavioral involvement have significant positive effects on children’s non-cognitive abilities. We use causal identification methods including propensity score matching and Mahalanobis distance matching to do the robustness test.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 101344"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139935235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}