{"title":"Impact of visual pedagogical interventions on EFL writing: A mixed-methods analysis of anxiety mitigation and advancement of creative thinking skills","authors":"Chia-ching Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101619","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101619","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Writing anxiety can adversely affect the writing performance of English as a foreign language (EFL) students. This study investigated the effectiveness of employing visual instructional strategies, graphic organizers and picture cards as instructional tools, for reducing writing anxiety in EFL students from a technological university in Taiwan. Participants were undergraduates, with one class using graphic organizers (GO group) and the other using picture cards (CG group). A convergent mixed-methods approach was used, combining pre–post writing tests and anxiety surveys with semi-structured focus-group interviews. The CG group showed lower post-intervention anxiety than the GO group, and item-level change-score analyses indicated significant group differences in selected anxiety facets. Interviews revealed that the GO group reported improved confidence in vocabulary and sentence construction, finding the tool helpful for organizing thoughts and structuring essays. While the CG group reported enhanced motivation and imagination, some participants experienced situational anxiety when they perceived a lack of thematic connection between the randomly assigned picture cards. Overall, both tools may help mitigate writing anxiety and support writing outcomes, suggesting their instructional value depending on learner needs and task demands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 101619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148167760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Larger immigrant-native academic achievement gaps in EU countries: A study of the PISA assessment from 2006 to 2022","authors":"Qingke Guo , Xiaojie Xin","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101556","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101556","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study employs PISA data (2006–2022) to examine immigrant-native achievement gaps in EU and non-EU nations across three sub-studies. Study 1 reveals that immigrant disadvantage is not universal; in fact, immigrant students outperform their native peers in many non-EU and several EU nations. Study 2, focusing on stable EU member states, finds consistently larger achievement gaps in EU nations compared to non-EU nations. Study 3 utilizes latent growth modeling and identifies no significant divergence in gap trends between EU and non-EU education systems. According to existing literature, these differences may originate from factors such as migration policy selectivity, socioeconomic backgrounds, and institutional responsiveness. Although performance gaps persist, EU nations exhibit lower within-country score dispersion, pointing to greater internal equity. The study concludes with policy recommendations aimed at narrowing these gaps, including refining immigrant screening mechanisms, enhancing teacher preparation in multicultural education, and reforming early tracking systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145925716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Wanning Huang, Jason M. Stephens, Gavin T.L. Brown
{"title":"Academic ability generates better quality feedback: Evidence from PeerWise assessments","authors":"Wanning Huang, Jason M. Stephens, Gavin T.L. Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101566","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101566","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The provision of feedback by students to peers contributes to their own learning and performance, improves learning experiences, and enhances understanding, problem-solving, and self-assessment abilities. However, the nature of feedback generated by students is not fully understood and, given its ubiquity, merits further investigation. In the present study, undergraduate students (<em>N</em> = 226) were asked to provide feedback on multiple-choice questions they had created. Each student’s generated feedback utterance (<em>N</em> = 977) was coded for complexity, and item response theory methods were used to eliminate non-discriminating feedback types. Five types of feedback fit the item response theory model: verification, justification, explication, source, and metacognition. Structural equation modelling indicated that students’ midterm academic performance predicted both the length and complexity of students’ generated feedback. The latter also predicted end-of-course performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146077755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Master’s students’ perceptions of supervisory feedback and its links to engagement and learning: A mixed-methods study","authors":"Kim-Daniel Vattøy","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101563","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101563","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This concurrent mixed-methods study examined how master’s students (<em>n</em> = 179) perceive supervisory feedback and how these perceptions relate to feedback engagement and learning. Quantitative data from validated scales were analysed using factor, descriptive, correlation, and regression analyses, while qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. All dimensions correlated positively with feedback engagement, but regression analysis showed that feedback engagement was most strongly predicted by perceived supervisor contribution to learning, followed by satisfaction with supervisor and task-focused feedback. Qualitative findings revealed four themes: supervisory support as a confidence anchor, negotiating clarity and consistency in feedback, adaptive feedback engagement through reflection and critical judgement, and coping with ambiguity and emotional strain in feedback use. These findings suggest that while task-focused feedback is important, relational support and clarity are critical for fostering adaptive feedback engagement. Implications include enhancing supervisor training to foster dialogic, learning-focused feedback that nurtures self-belief, autonomy, and resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101563"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146022531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nurullah Eryilmaz , Mehmet Şükrü Bellibaş , Izhak Berkovich
{"title":"Distributed leadership and teacher job satisfaction over time: A large-scale trend analysis of TALIS 2013 and 2018","authors":"Nurullah Eryilmaz , Mehmet Şükrü Bellibaş , Izhak Berkovich","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101555","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101555","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates international trends in distributed leadership and teacher job satisfaction, using data from the 2013 and 2018 cycles of the OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey. Focusing on countries that participated in both waves, the study addresses two key aims: (1) to examine cross-national changes in mean levels of teacher job satisfaction, both with the profession and the workplace, between 2013 and 2018, and to assess the statistical significance of these changes; and (2) to explore whether the strength of the relationship between distributed leadership and the two dimensions of job satisfaction has changed over time, and whether these changes varied significantly across countries. The findings revealed a significant overall decline in both aspects of teacher satisfaction from 2013 to 2018, with varying results across countries. However, the decline was larger for teacher satisfaction with the profession. We also found that although the overall association between distributed leadership and job satisfaction with the work environment remained largely stable, the overall relationship between distributed leadership and job satisfaction with the profession showed a slight decline; this change was not statistically significant. We conclude that leadership remains a crucial driver of teacher job satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101555"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145737674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Inequitable distribution of teachers in K-12 education: A systematic quantitative review","authors":"Yuankun Yao , Karen M. Potter","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101576","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101576","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This systematic review analyzes 322 comparisons from 24 studies to assess inequities in the distribution of underprepared teachers in U.S. K–12 schools. Findings show that schools serving marginalized students consistently have higher proportions of underprepared teachers. The size of these disparities varies based on how teacher quality is measured—larger gaps appear when using licensure scores or college degrees compared to value-added metrics. Since 2005, school-level disparities have slightly narrowed, but student-level inequities have persisted or worsened. Trends differ by indicator: gaps in experience and value-added scores have widened, while gaps based on teacher credentials have narrowed. The review suggests shifting policy focus from certification-based metrics to measures that better predict student outcomes, like pedagogical content knowledge and classroom effectiveness. Within-school equity strategies, such as transparent teacher assignments and strong mentoring systems, are also recommended to ensure all students have access to effective, well-supported educators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101576"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146077753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reading more, achieving more? Long-term gender gaps in reading behavior and reading achievement","authors":"Isa Steinmann , Rolf Strietholt","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101581","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101581","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gender gaps in reading achievement have been consistently documented across countries and over time, with girls typically outperforming boys. However, explanations for cross-national and temporal variation in these gaps remain limited. This study addresses this research gap using international large-scale assessment data from 56 countries over a 46-year time span, representing the most comprehensive analysis of its kind to date. We examine whether country-level trends in gender differences in reading behavior predict corresponding trends in gender gaps in reading achievement. Using fixed-effects regression models, we find that shifts in gender gaps in free time reading frequency are significantly associated with shifts in reading achievement gaps, even after accounting for potential confounders. Our findings provide empirical support for the Gender Similarity Hypothesis, emphasizing the role of social and behavioral factors. The study offers valuable implications for educational policy aiming to reduce gender disparities in literacy outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101581"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146172979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
G. Molenberghs , R. Van Gasse , E. Goffin , S. De Maeyer , J. Vanhoof
{"title":"Students’ willingness to engage with feedback from central tests: The influence of cognitive and non-cognitive student characteristics","authors":"G. Molenberghs , R. Van Gasse , E. Goffin , S. De Maeyer , J. Vanhoof","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101561","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101561","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In contemporary education, increasing attention is paid to the developmental use of central tests. While the usefulness of performance data for school improvement is widely acknowledged, students’ willingness to engage with individual feedback from low-stakes central tests has received less scrutiny. This study explores such willingness using survey data from 15526 students in Flemish education. Multilevel regression analyses examined relations with students’ cognitive attitudes, test-taking effort, ability, gender, and educational level. Overall, students’ willingness proved limited, yet variation emerged. A more positive cognitive attitude and greater test-taking effort related to higher willingness. Conversely, secondary school students and boys reported lower willingness, with effects varying across student characteristics. Findings highlight that students’ willingness cannot be assumed. To fully harness the potential of feedback from low-stakes central tests as an informational resource and a developmental learning tool for students, fostering students’ understanding of the value of both tests and feedback is crucial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101561"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146022534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brianna L. Kennedy , Semiha Bekir , Lotte Henrichs
{"title":"An illustrative case study of researcher roles and challenges in a Dutch school-level research-practice partnership","authors":"Brianna L. Kennedy , Semiha Bekir , Lotte Henrichs","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101558","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101558","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Researchers at research-intensive universities may participate in research-practice partnerships (RPPs) to make their research activities more relevant and impacting. RPPs center equity as a goal, which means researchers and other stakeholders participate in defining and enacting equity through the partnership. Researchers must discern how to address equity goals while enacting the roles of knowledge broker, knowledge use facilitator, and knowledge development facilitator. Role enactment occurs as researchers face the challenges related to the content focus of the RPP and time demands. In this study, we examined artifacts (<em>n</em> = 50) from an RPP between a team of researchers and nine educators between 2021 and 2024 to understand how we, as researchers, enacted these roles and negotiated these challenges. Findings show how surface level consensus about the meaning and importance of equity work bought us time to develop the relational capital necessary to lead more authentic discussions about inequitable practices. We co-constructed a research focus to prioritize equity-in-process but thereby curtailed the full engagement of our research expertise. Findings imply that more robust focus on school- and classroom-level RPPs reveal additional dynamics and mechanisms that allow for sustained changes in classroom teaching that support equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146022535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
David Zamorano , Ernesto Panadero , Maryam Alqassab , Joaquín Fernando Gómez-Varela
{"title":"Provider versus recipient: Peer feedback roles effect on task performance, perceptions of learning, trust, and epistemic emotions","authors":"David Zamorano , Ernesto Panadero , Maryam Alqassab , Joaquín Fernando Gómez-Varela","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101560","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101560","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>When participating in peer feedback, students typically act as either providers or recipients. While existing research indicates these roles may influence learning in different ways, evidence on their specific effects remains scarce. This study investigated the impact of peer feedback roles on task performance, perceptions of learning and trust, and emotions. Using a repeated-measures quasi-experimental design, 95 undergraduate Physical Education students completed a task, were randomly assigned to the provider or recipient role, and then completed a second task. The results showed no significant differences between roles in improvements in task performance or perceived learning, although both roles significantly improved over time. Role assignment also did not affect trust in oneself or peers, nor the intensity of epistemic emotions. Overall, these findings suggest that, in the short term, taking the role of provider or recipient leads to similar learning outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101560"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146077757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}