Thin slices of teaching behavior: Video observation as complement to the assessment of teaching quality and teacher training interventions

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Philipp Beuchel , Jana Groß Ophoff , Colin Cramer
{"title":"Thin slices of teaching behavior: Video observation as complement to the assessment of teaching quality and teacher training interventions","authors":"Philipp Beuchel ,&nbsp;Jana Groß Ophoff ,&nbsp;Colin Cramer","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In research on teaching and teachers, there is a need for valid and economic methods of assessing teaching quality. One approach to such assessment of teaching quality is the so-called <em>thin slices</em> method of video observations—short sequences judged by briefly trained raters. Until now, this method has been used on cross-sectional data only, and not in studies evaluating professional development programs of teachers. In this study, ratings of 41 teacher trainees were cross-validated with student judgments (<em>N</em> = 806) of the same observed lessons in the context of a mindfulness intervention study. For the aspects <em>Disturbances</em>, <em>Time Efficiency</em>, and <em>Student Support</em>, the agreement of students’ and external raters’ ratings was established, underscoring the criterion validity. Additionally, ratings based on the thin slices method were sensitive enough to detect general time effects during teacher training and training effects of an intervention for teachers both on classroom disturbances.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 101486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000434","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In research on teaching and teachers, there is a need for valid and economic methods of assessing teaching quality. One approach to such assessment of teaching quality is the so-called thin slices method of video observations—short sequences judged by briefly trained raters. Until now, this method has been used on cross-sectional data only, and not in studies evaluating professional development programs of teachers. In this study, ratings of 41 teacher trainees were cross-validated with student judgments (N = 806) of the same observed lessons in the context of a mindfulness intervention study. For the aspects Disturbances, Time Efficiency, and Student Support, the agreement of students’ and external raters’ ratings was established, underscoring the criterion validity. Additionally, ratings based on the thin slices method were sensitive enough to detect general time effects during teacher training and training effects of an intervention for teachers both on classroom disturbances.
教学行为的薄片:视频观察作为教学质量评估和教师培训干预的补充
在教学和教师研究中,需要一种有效的、经济的教学质量评价方法。一种评估教学质量的方法是所谓的视频观察的薄片法——由经过简单训练的评分员判断的短序列。到目前为止,这种方法只用于横截面数据,而不是用于评估教师专业发展计划的研究。在本研究中,在正念干预研究的背景下,41名受训教师的评分与学生对相同观察课程的判断(N = 806)进行交叉验证。在干扰、时间效率和学生支持方面,建立了学生和外部评分者评分的一致性,强调了标准的效度。此外,基于薄片法的评分足够敏感,可以检测教师培训期间的一般时间效应和教师干预对课堂干扰的培训效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信