坦桑尼亚教师评估素养、形成性评估实践及其感知效能:范围审查

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Rajabu Abdalah Shafii , Jean-Louis Berger
{"title":"坦桑尼亚教师评估素养、形成性评估实践及其感知效能:范围审查","authors":"Rajabu Abdalah Shafii ,&nbsp;Jean-Louis Berger","doi":"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This scoping review explored the formative assessment (FA) practices, assessment literacy, and perceived efficacy in assessment practices of teachers in Tanzania and synthesised the evidence from 41 studies published between 2005 and 2024. The results highlight key FA strategies, such as feedback practice, questioning, peer and self-assessments, and clarifying learning intentions and success criteria. The results indicate that teachers’ FA practices are constrained by inadequate assessment literacy, large class sizes, resource shortage, and the dominance of traditional assessment approaches geared towards national examinations. Despite curriculum reforms emphasising FA, traditional teacher-centred methods remain prevalent. This review underscores the need for professional development and policy initiatives that strengthen knowledge of assessment and the confidence of teachers in adopting assessment practices. The dynamic approach to teacher professional development is recommended to meet specific teacher’s needs and embedded in daily teaching practices to support effective implementation of FA and to improve student learning outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47539,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 101496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teacher assessment literacy, formative assessment practices, and their perceived efficacy in Tanzania: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Rajabu Abdalah Shafii ,&nbsp;Jean-Louis Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This scoping review explored the formative assessment (FA) practices, assessment literacy, and perceived efficacy in assessment practices of teachers in Tanzania and synthesised the evidence from 41 studies published between 2005 and 2024. The results highlight key FA strategies, such as feedback practice, questioning, peer and self-assessments, and clarifying learning intentions and success criteria. The results indicate that teachers’ FA practices are constrained by inadequate assessment literacy, large class sizes, resource shortage, and the dominance of traditional assessment approaches geared towards national examinations. Despite curriculum reforms emphasising FA, traditional teacher-centred methods remain prevalent. This review underscores the need for professional development and policy initiatives that strengthen knowledge of assessment and the confidence of teachers in adopting assessment practices. The dynamic approach to teacher professional development is recommended to meet specific teacher’s needs and embedded in daily teaching practices to support effective implementation of FA and to improve student learning outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000537\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X25000537","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项范围审查探讨了坦桑尼亚教师评估实践中的形成性评估(FA)实践、评估素养和感知效能,并综合了2005年至2024年间发表的41项研究的证据。结果强调了关键的FA策略,如反馈练习、提问、同伴和自我评估,以及澄清学习意图和成功标准。结果表明,教师的评估实践受到评估素养不足、班级规模大、资源短缺以及面向国家考试的传统评估方法占主导地位的制约。尽管课程改革强调FA,传统的以教师为中心的方法仍然盛行。这次审查强调需要专业发展和政策举措,以加强对评估的认识和教师采用评估做法的信心。教师专业发展的动态方法被推荐为满足教师的特定需求,并嵌入到日常教学实践中,以支持有效实施FA并改善学生的学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teacher assessment literacy, formative assessment practices, and their perceived efficacy in Tanzania: A scoping review
This scoping review explored the formative assessment (FA) practices, assessment literacy, and perceived efficacy in assessment practices of teachers in Tanzania and synthesised the evidence from 41 studies published between 2005 and 2024. The results highlight key FA strategies, such as feedback practice, questioning, peer and self-assessments, and clarifying learning intentions and success criteria. The results indicate that teachers’ FA practices are constrained by inadequate assessment literacy, large class sizes, resource shortage, and the dominance of traditional assessment approaches geared towards national examinations. Despite curriculum reforms emphasising FA, traditional teacher-centred methods remain prevalent. This review underscores the need for professional development and policy initiatives that strengthen knowledge of assessment and the confidence of teachers in adopting assessment practices. The dynamic approach to teacher professional development is recommended to meet specific teacher’s needs and embedded in daily teaching practices to support effective implementation of FA and to improve student learning outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Studies in Educational Evaluation publishes original reports of evaluation studies. Four types of articles are published by the journal: (a) Empirical evaluation studies representing evaluation practice in educational systems around the world; (b) Theoretical reflections and empirical studies related to issues involved in the evaluation of educational programs, educational institutions, educational personnel and student assessment; (c) Articles summarizing the state-of-the-art concerning specific topics in evaluation in general or in a particular country or group of countries; (d) Book reviews and brief abstracts of evaluation studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信