{"title":"Promoting humanizing, meaningful, and just language instruction for multilingual learners and their peers: A pedagogical vision illustrated by examples from practice","authors":"Emily Phillips Galloway , Paola Uccelli","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101358","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101358","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this article, we engage with the question of how to create just and humanizing instructional conditions for learning <em>through</em> and <em>about</em> language at school. Rather than an empirical study, this article invites readers to rethink the role of languages in education by introducing and illustrating what we call <em>Pedagogies of Voices</em> (POV). Informed by research and practice, POV instructional approaches acknowledge and leverage the reality of multilingual and multidialectal repertoires in linguistically diverse classrooms, counteracting the tendency towards prescriptivism, which constrains what counts as language learning and teaching in schools. Through vignettes from middle-school multilingual classrooms implementing the TRANSLATE literacy curriculum, we illustrate how POV-inspired instruction transforms the conventions of classroom interactions by scaffolding language learning through relational activities that affirm and expand students’ multilingual repertoires and metalinguistic strategies for learning through and about language. These POV-inspired practices shift the role of teachers, who become learners of their students’ ways with language and shift the instructional goal from a narrow focus on teaching the language of school literacy to a concerted effort to foster flexible, resourceful, critical, and creative student voices—what we call <em>Critical Rhetorical Flexibility</em>. These two shifts, we argue, contribute to creating the enabling conditions to foster inclusive, humanizing communities in which students and teachers experience the joyful challenge of learning through languages together. We conclude with thoughts and considerations for theory, future practice-embedded research, and evidence-based educational practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142657690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Encouraging translanguaging in collaborative talk in EFL classrooms: An epistemic network comparative study","authors":"Ming Li, Zhouqin Qu","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101360","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101360","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study adopted a modified Mercer's framework on types of talk and epistemic network analysis to explore the collaborative talk of four groups of undergraduate students in an EFL classroom in southwest China. Two groups were encouraged to use multilingual resources while two others were asked to use English only. The results showed that translanguaging helped students produce more exploratory talk, but less cumulative talk, display a more balanced and sophisticated cognitive network, and have a better performance in higher-order thinking. Students used the translanguaging strategies of code-switching, code-mixing, and cross-language recapping to ask for facts, share ideas, propose alternative ideas, explain and justify themselves. Translanguaging can improve the quality of students’ collaborative talk while not diminishing the quantity of their English language output. Therefore, it's advisable to advocate translanguaging pedagogy in EFL classrooms, but students should be guided to use translanguaging strategies flexibly and avoid overusing their L1.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101360"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142657689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Grammatical and rhetorical reasoning in upper secondary students’ collaborative talk about a literary text","authors":"Agnes Strandberg , Jimmy van Rijt","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101359","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101359","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores different talk types and characteristics of grammatical and rhetorical reflections in L1 students’ collaborative talk about a literary text (<em>n</em> = 12, aged 15–17). The data is drawn from an intervention of contextualized grammar teaching in Swedish upper secondary school. To illuminate different talk types and the characteristics of the grammatical and rhetorical reflections, a deductive and inductive analysis in NVivo was carried out. The findings partly confirm previous results concerning rules of thumb and grammatical misconceptions. The current study also indicates that there is a relationship between talk types and prompted questions, and the quality of grammatical and rhetorical reasoning. When students are trying to locate a grammatical concept, the talk type is mainly characterized as cumulative and disputational, whereas linking grammar and rhetoric is exploratory. This paper discusses explanations for these relationships along with strategies for teachers when facilitating and supporting the development of students’ metalinguistic understanding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142530620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Understanding EFL students’ academically transitioning experiences with meaning-making-based instruction: A qualitative inquiry","authors":"Xiaodong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101357","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101357","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This qualitative study took place in a content-based English as a foreign language (EFL) reading course at a Chinese university. The students had to academically transition from their prior reading practices, which involved surface meaning and/or linguistic resources, to the deconstruction of the deep meaning of texts. Interviews with 16 EFL students, their reflections, as well as the researcher's field notes and audio recordings of classroom interactions, were qualitatively analyzed. The study reveals that the EFL student readers’ academic transition to the content-based reading course was supported by the pedagogical use of systemic functional linguistics (SFL). With SFL pedagogy, the students were exposed to meaning-making-based instruction, which focused on the close relationship between linguistic resources and meanings. This transition was especially exemplified by the students’ positive experiences with leveraging meaning-making-based knowledge when harnessing linguistic resources as gateways for gaining access to the deep meanings of texts, as expected in the transitioning context. However, during the transitioning process in relation to their meaning-making-based knowledge, students encountered constraints from their previous and ongoing experiences (e.g., their sensitivity to the linguistic resources in a text or textbook design), which were mitigated through teacher mediation. This study concludes that meaning-making-based instruction may have played a useful role in mediating and facilitating the EFL student readers’ transition to academically demanding reading, although the transitioning process was sensitive to dynamic but surmountable constraints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142416523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"On the necessity (and insufficiency) of ethnographic perspectives: Towards an inter-scalar approach to research on “academic language”","authors":"Ramón Antonio Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101355","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101355","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This methodological commentary extends and complicates earlier discussions of the need for ethnographic approaches to exploring “academic language.” While indispensable as a tool for contextualizing classroom language use, this commentary suggests that ethnography alone is insufficient to the task of elucidating academic language in school-based settings. Drawing on ethnographic and interactional data, this article argues for the necessity of looking across multiple scales of analysis in order to apprehend the complex, nuanced, and contradictory ways in which academic language is learned, produced, and perceived in schools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142270239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Let a hundred flowers bloom: Towards a coexistence of paradigms in language assessment literacy","authors":"Xiaoli Su , Hongbiao Yin , Icy Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101346","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101346","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Language assessment literacy, an evolving and dynamic research field, assumes a critical role in applied linguistics. This narrative review analyzes different epistemological understandings regarding language assessment literacy. Guided by the three cognitive interests as defined by Jürgen Habermas, the article illustrates the characteristics of three paradigms of language assessment literacy: language assessment literacy as a product from the technical perspective, as a process from the practical perspective, and as a praxis from the critical perspective. The advantages and drawbacks of each paradigm are also discussed. By analysing language assessment literacy through the lens of these cognitive interests, we offer insights into how the scope of language assessment literacy can be broadened and how a critical perspective can initiate democratic discussions on under-explored issues in this research field. Also, we argue that it is crucial for academics in applied linguistics to be open-minded about the coexistence of different paradigms, as this can lead to significant contributions to language education and language assessment policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101346"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142243535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Pre-service teachers’ hinting practices in managing responses in a microteaching context","authors":"Eunseok Ro , Hyunwoo Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101345","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101345","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Microteaching is a pedagogical approach that allows educators to enhance their teaching techniques through practice and feedback in controlled, classroom-like environments. This study uses multimodal conversation analysis to investigate how pre-service teachers at a Korean university, with English as their second language, manage student participation in microteaching sessions. The analysis reveals the intricacies of teachers’ hinting practices that are aimed at mobilizing and pursuing student responses. The excerpts exemplify how pre-service teachers use hints to foster an engaged and dynamic classroom environment, highlighting their contingent decision-making in question-and-answer sequences. These findings offer valuable insights into the teaching practices employed by pre-service teachers in a microteaching context and contribute to expanding our understanding of classroom interactional competence in teacher education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142230638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ewa Bergh Nestlog , Kristina Danielsson , Fredrik Jeppsson
{"title":"Disciplinary content and text structures communicated in the classroom – pathways in science lessons","authors":"Ewa Bergh Nestlog , Kristina Danielsson , Fredrik Jeppsson","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101343","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101343","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Making meaning about disciplinary knowledge involves both disciplinary content and relevant semiotic resources (e.g., text structures) for communicating the content, as two sides of a coin. The purpose of this study is to contribute to research in science education with a model for visualising how the two sides of the coin are elaborated in classroom interaction, aiming to support students’ disciplinary knowledge development. The model was developed based on data from a series of lessons in a primary science classroom where the teacher and her students negotiated and made meaning about action and reaction forces. We show how the model can be used to deepen the understanding of how the meaning making through classroom interaction forms a pathway, visualising different levels of disciplinary literacy and hence the model's usefulness for both research and for designing teaching practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589824000767/pdfft?md5=767b29972b6cd971fbe24bcf0342e9ce&pid=1-s2.0-S0898589824000767-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142168615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Two voices, one paper: Using storywork to reassess the impact of academic language on “English Learners” in Alaska","authors":"Ève Ryan, Giovanna Arnaq Wilde","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101344","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101344","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, featuring a collaboration between Ève, a white applied linguist from Réunion Island, and Giovanna, an Indigenous Yupik undergraduate student from Mountain Village, we offer perspectives from Alaska on the topic of academic language. Academic English has served as a tool to further marginalize Alaska Native students, who make up a large segment of the student population designated as English Learners in Alaska. After providing background information on the linguistic landscape of Alaska, we discuss considerations for the academic language construct, and end with implications for assessment, suggesting ways to indigenize our approach to language assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 101344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142150711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Using multimodal resources to design EFL classroom lead-ins—A multimodal pedagogical stylistics perspective","authors":"Qian Lei , Chunlei Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101338","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.linged.2024.101338","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study explores the ways EFL teachers use multimodal resources to design classroom lead-ins on the basis of multimodal stylistic analyses of the lead-ins in six award-winning classroom demonstrations. Results show that verbal mode and image mode are mainly used in the lead-ins to establish cognitive framework for the new teaching topics, and body language, such as eye movements, facial expressions, and gestures, is particularly important in attracting students’ attention and motivate their participation. The foregrounded complementary reinforcement relationships within the multimodal ensembles in the lead-ins play significant roles in designing students’ learning experiences. Discussions on the multimodal stylistic features and their teaching effects also indicate that topic relevance, closeness to life, mode conciseness, proper use of body language, complementary reinforcement within mode ensembles, and dynamicity of mode choices are general guidelines for the design of effective multimodal classroom lead-ins. The study not only verifies the effectiveness of the multimodal pedagogical stylistic theory but also provides feasible implications for the design and implementation of multimodal classroom lead-ins in EFL teaching.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 101338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142098056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}