Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie最新文献

{"title":"[Utilization of Psychosocial Support for Young Adults with Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors].","authors":"Maren Weiss, Anja Hildebrand, Mark Stemmler","doi":"10.1055/a-2398-6074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2398-6074","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study explores the utilization of psychosocial support by young adults facing suicidal ideation or impulses, considering a comprehensive spectrum of psychosocial services. The study sheds light on help utilization and gaps in service use among different groups. The data is derived from the baseline assessment of the research project \"Outcome Evaluation [U25]\". The sample includes 888 young adults who reported suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Among the participants, 55% accessed at least one psychosocial service. Medical/psychotherapy services were the most utilized (54%), followed by professional counseling (34%) and non-professional self-help services (22%). Gender differences were observed, with males using help less frequently than females and individuals with diverse gender identities. Participants in relationships were less likely to seek help than singles. A migrant background showed no consistent impact on service utilization. Psychological distress and suicide literacy were associated with increased service utilization. Regression analysis revealed that gender and relationship status remained predictors of service utilization even when considering mental distress, suicidal thoughts and behaviors, and suicide literacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[Learning Evidence-Based Practice - Multi-Perspective Competence Development using the Example of Generalised Anxiety Disorder].","authors":"Christoph Flückiger, Thomas Munder, Jan Schürmann-Vengels","doi":"10.1055/a-2382-7598","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2382-7598","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Within the framework of the evidence-based practice model of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2006), psychotherapeutic core competences are mostly formulated transdiagnostically and transtheoretically, but do not exclude the systematic consideration of symptom-specific aspects. This article provides an exemplary case study of a person suffering from a generalized anxiety disorder to illustrate how evidence-based practice can be implemented. Multi-perspective competence development can be stimulated in training through the following therapeutic areas: (1) through broad assessment and psychodiagnostics, (2) through joint development of an individual explanatory model, (3) through inclusion of symptom-specific models, (4) through broad consideration of stringent interventions, (5) through application of various treatment modalities, (6) through patient-centred treatment implementation. The article concludes with a list of study examples of how psychotherapeutic competence development can be researched within the framework of the evidence-based practice model.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[Partnership Status And Prevalence Of Mental Disorders In Women And Men With Cancer].","authors":"Anne-Kathrin Köditz, Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Jochen Ernst","doi":"10.1055/a-2390-1951","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2390-1951","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients facing the diagnosis of cancer are confronted with high stress levels, which increase the risk of developing a mental disorder. Being in a relationship moderates patients' mental health and can have a risk-reducing effect. We aim to describe the influence of partnership status on the 4-week-prevalence of mental disorders in cancer patients and how it varies by gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of the secondary data analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional study, 1857 patients with cancer (51,6% women, age 18-75 years, Ø age 57 years, 79,7% in a partnership) were assessed using a written questionnaire and, for the diagnosis of psychological disorders (4-week prevalence), the CIDI-O interview. Frequency calculations and binary logistic analyses were carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the univariate analyses, the frequency of the presence of at least one mental disorder is significantly lower in patients who are in a relationship (25,4% vs. 35,3%, p<0,001). They are also less likely to simultaneously suffer from multiple mental disorders. These differences are also evident for individual classes of disorders. The multivariate gender-differentiated analysis confirms this trend. In addition to age and income as significant predictors, only men experience a significant protective effect of their relationship against the occurrence of a mental disorder (OR=2,5, p<0,001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There has been very limited research on the links between partnership status, gender, and mental disorders in cancer patients. The results found in our analyses should be further explored, particularly regarding the protective role of partnership against developing mental disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the context of psycho-oncological care the status of living alone should be considered as a possible risk factor for developing mental disorders, especially in men.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[Young Adult Cancer Patients (AYA): Preferences for Outpatient Psychosocial Care and Gender-Specific Differences - Results from the AYA-LE study].","authors":"Charlyn Görres, Katja Leuteritz, Annekathrin Sender, Kristina Geue","doi":"10.1055/a-2390-1690","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2390-1690","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective of the study: </strong>To investigate the importance of individual topics in outpatient care services and the preferences for their design from the perspective of young adults with cancer (AYA=\"adolescents and young adults\") in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A total of 514 AYAs aged 18-39 years were surveyed twice over a 12-month period (t1=immediately after acute treatment, t2=12 months post-treatment) regarding the importance and satisfaction with topics such as anxiety, the impact of the illness on partnerships/family and social environment, future perspectives, personal coping strategies, sexuality, and desire for children/fertility, as well as the types of care services. The subjective importance and satisfaction with the care topics and services were analyzed using variance and moderator analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most important topics for care services were future career prospects (M=3.22, SD=1.56), social impact (M=3.19, SD=1.54), and personal coping strategies (M=3.52, SD=1.46). The greatest dissatisfaction was noted in the areas of sexuality (M=2.01, SD=1.59) and desire for children/fertility (M=2.08, SD=1.72). At time t2, relaxation techniques (M=3.46, SD=1.36) and psychological counseling (M=3.43, SD=1.46) were the most desired care services. Female AYAs rated psychological counseling (F[1.199)=9.21, p=0.003), social counseling (F[1.221]=6.60, p=0.011), creative therapy options (F[1.219]=21.74, p<0.001), support groups (F[1.215]=4.29, p=0.040), patient education (F[1.210]=6.96, p=0.009), and relaxation techniques (F[1.194]=23.68, p<0.001) significantly more important than male AYAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlighted several areas of dissatisfaction with the current outpatient care services for AYAs. The results demonstrate the need to incorporate cross-sex and gender-specific care preferences of AYAs to improve outpatient psychosocial care. A specific set of AYA-care services should be designed and implemented to address the aforementioned psychosocial topics, which include sexuality and the desire for children/fertility. It is also crucial for outpatient practice to raise awareness among the involved professional groups. Further research is required to gain a deeper understanding of sex differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE)].","authors":"Laura Lübke, Diana Krogmann, Carsten Spitzer","doi":"10.1055/a-2366-9995","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2366-9995","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Empathy as a central element of social cognition plays a decisive role in various psychosocial areas and interpersonal dynamics, especially within the context of psychotherapy. Despite the controversy surrounding a standardized definition, empathy is generally regarded as a multidimensional concept that encompasses both cognitive and affective dimensions. This differentiation between cognitive and affective facets is addressed by a widely used and internationally well-established self-report measure of empathy, the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE). This study focuses on evaluating the psychometric properties of the German version of the QCAE. In a convenience sample (N=1300), the postulated confirmatory five-factor model showed an adequate fit to the underlying structure. The subscales of the QCAE exhibited satisfactory internal consistency and convergent validity with other instruments measuring empathy. Despite certain methodological limitations, our findings suggest that the German version of the QCAE is suitable as a reliable and valid instrument for measuring empathy. Further studies in population-representative samples and clinical populations are required before a clear recommendation regarding its utilization can be provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142093957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[Learning from Mistakes? - A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Acquisition of Knowledge about Clinical Communication Skills Using Positive vs. Mixed Therapy Models].","authors":"Ulrike Maaß, Lydia Fehm, Franziska Kühne, Heide Wenzel, Florian Weck","doi":"10.1055/a-2359-7916","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2359-7916","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compares two types of therapeutic model videos: an ideal model and a model that shows mistakes. The idea is that the conscious perception of mistakes is more likely to help build a comprehensive understanding of clinical communication skills than an ideal model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of n1=111 psychology students and n2=57 people from the general population were randomly assigned to one of two training conditions as part of an online study. While one group watched a short but competent conversation of a behavioral therapist in their training with a positive model video, the other group watched a mixed model video in their training that showed a therapist with mediocre competence. In both training videos, the positive or negative behavior was marked with written explanations. Before and after the training, the participants rated the competencies of a therapist in another interview situation using standardized scales. These competence ratings were compared with those of two clinical experts and thus provided an indicator of the participants' conceptual knowledge of competent interviewing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A series of ANCOVA models showed that the group that saw the mixed model video deviated significantly less from the experts after training than the group that saw the positive model video (ηp2=0.03-0.10). However, the group that watched the positive (vs. mixed) model video deviated more strongly from the expert judgments on two of three competence scales after the training than before (<i>d</i>Pre-Post=0.78-0.82).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Overall, the hypothesis that mixed models are advantageous was confirmed. The unexpected results in the group with the positive model video could be explained by the fact that they set an unrealistically high anchor to which the later behavior is compared.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mixed models may offer some advantage over positive models in imparting knowledge about professional communication, especially when the model videos contain behaviorally relevant explanations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141976858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[Aspects of Utilization of Psychotherapy in Germany in Times of the GDR and Later].","authors":"Marie Theresa Kaufmann, Hannah D Nussmann, Ayline Heller, Elmar Brähler, Adrian Gallistl, Bernhard Strauß","doi":"10.1055/a-2351-4232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2351-4232","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective The aim of the study was to examine real differences in the use of psychotherapy in the New Federal States during the GDR era and today. In addition, differences according to the willingness seeking psychotherapy as well as barriers in opinions and contact to the mentally ill between people from the New Federal States, the Old Federal States and people who moved from the New Federal States to the Old Federal States (internal migrants) should be recorded, taking into account generational effects (experience of the Cold War - birth before / after January 1^st, 1980). Methods To investigate these questions, the data from a representative survey in the New Federal States of N=2729 people as well as the data from a second online based survey of people from the New and Old Federal States as well as internal migrants with a total of N=4789 participants were evaluated.Results There was a prevalence of 1% for the use of psychotherapy during the GDR era. Overall, the prevalence of therapy experiences among people who experienced the GDR and were born before January 1^st in 1980 was almost 13%. They also reported greater willingness seeking help for mental suffering since the end of the Cold War. The prevalence among younger people was about 12%. In the second survey, there were significant differences, among the older respondents. East Germans today and even during the GDR era were less willing to seek psychotherapy for mental suffering, they also have less contact to mentally ill people. Differences according to desires for distance from mentally ill people, self stigmatization in the presence of a mental illness and discrimination against mentally ill people emerged between East Germans, West Germans and internal migrants depending on generational affiliation.Discussion Barriers that prevent the use of psychotherapy should be taken into account on a generational and socialization specific basis. Socialization as a relevant factor might explain a lack of willingness to utilize psychotherapy amongst people that experienced the GDR era and still live in the new Federal States.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[Psychodiagnostics in Psychosocial Centers for Refugees].","authors":"Amelie Pettrich, Yuriy Nesterko, Elisa Rimek, Heide Glaesmer","doi":"10.1055/a-2352-2984","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2352-2984","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accurate psychodiagnostics is crucial for diagnosing and ensuring quality treatment for individuals with mental health disorders. However, there is limited understanding of psychodiagnostic practices within Psychosocial Centers (PSZ) when dealing with refugees, particularly in the presence of language and cultural barriers and resource constraints. This study aims to evaluate the current status and potential pathways for enhancing culturally sensitive diagnostics in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online survey using a self-developed questionnaire with representatives from 32 PSZ to examine psychodiagnostic practices, barriers, and perceived development potentials, and analyzed the data descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most centers prefer individual case assessments over standardized diagnostics. Key barriers to using standardized questionnaires and interviews include communication difficulties (unfamiliarity with question formats, reading and writing difficulties) and resource limitations (time, translation). When conducting diagnostics, time constraints and prioritizing complex cases are the primary challenges. Additional assessments are needed for several disorders and languages. Employees are interested in receiving training in the field of culturally sensitive diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Diagnostic practice in the PSZs is characterized by numerous challenges that differ from the challenges in standard care. In order to ensure appropriate standardized diagnostics and care for mentally distressed people with a refugee or migrant background, further expansion of the linguistic and cultural adaptation of established diagnostic instruments is essential.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the care of psychologically distressed refugees, culturally sensitive standardized diagnostics offer critical benefits for both practitioners and affected individuals. Existing resources are being referred to.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141894594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[How to Support People with Hearing Impairment beyond Hearing aid Provision - A Systematic Review on Self-Management Interventions].","authors":"Sophie Geßner, Michael Fuchs, Lennart Heinrich Pieper, Kathleen Tretbar","doi":"10.1055/a-2333-7521","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2333-7521","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>People with hearing handicap have to use a whole range of strategies to cope with everyday challenges - they have to self-manage their hearing impairment. While the support of self-management is well established in foreign language audiological rehabilitation programs, there are no recommendations in Germany yet. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is first to give an overview of existing self-management interventions for people with hearing handicap and then to suggest possible applications in the German care system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed. The articles dealt with self-management interventions for people with hearing impairment. This eligibility criterion was applied to titles, abstracts, and full texts. If eligible, information on the publication, intervention, and evaluation were extracted and qualitatively summarized. The methodological quality of studies was investigated using the NIH assessment tool for interventional studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>23 papers could be included and show a high heterogeneity regarding methodological quality, applied intervention, and design of evaluation. The interventions pursuing various goals include a wide range of content (e. g., communication improvement or psychosocial aspects) and have been implemented on a group-based, individual-based, or self-administered level. Despite a few studies that failed to demonstrate intervention effects, most evaluations found positive ef-fects of the intervention on hearing impairment, psychological well-being, and communication.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The included studies present a high heterogeneity with regard to methodological quality, the intervention conducted, and the evaluation design. Therefore, a summary of the findings was only possible in a qualitative manner. Possibilities of adapting existing intervention programs as well as chances and limits of an implementation in the German health care system are to be discussed in the following.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, interventions including self-management support seem to be a profitable complement to sole technical device supply and should be further fostered in German-speaking countries as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141601892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"[Indication and Contraindication of Video-Based Psychotherapy: A Qualitative Delphi Survey to Capture Psychotherapists' Reflection and Deliberation Processes].","authors":"Isabelle Thurmann, Alena Leukhardt, Christiane Eichenberg","doi":"10.1055/a-2255-3800","DOIUrl":"10.1055/a-2255-3800","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Corona pandemic forced many psychotherapists to make a rapid transition to video setting. Even after the acute phase of the pandemic, video-based treatments can be determined to a certain extent in practice. Thus, indication and contraindication recommendations are essential to ensure treatment quality. However, empirical studies are almost completely lacking in this regard. In the context of this work, the decision-making and consideration processes of psychotherapists regarding video-based treatments are to be recorded and those factors that can have an effect on the indication are to be identified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two-stage, qualitative Delphi survey with psychodynamically oriented psychotherapists (n=9) and behavioural therapists (n=7) who can be assigned to the fields of research and practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The quality of the therapeutic alliance guides the participants' choice of setting. An indication for video setting results from the feasibility of therapeutic interventions and the respective treatment goal. The therapists weighed the costs and benefits of video setting for various disorders. The changed feeling of control on both sides and the possibility of improving health care are decisive factors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Based on the results, a decision tree for psychotherapists was created, which includes the identified indication criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140858825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}