虚空可以测量吗?德国版主观空虚量表的心理测量学评价[j]。

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Naomi Johanna Seifert, Laura Lübke, Johannes Zimmermann, Christopher J Hopwood, Elmar Brähler, Matthias Volz, Cord Benecke, Carsten Spitzer
{"title":"虚空可以测量吗?德国版主观空虚量表的心理测量学评价[j]。","authors":"Naomi Johanna Seifert, Laura Lübke, Johannes Zimmermann, Christopher J Hopwood, Elmar Brähler, Matthias Volz, Cord Benecke, Carsten Spitzer","doi":"10.1055/a-2703-2617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subjective feelings of inner emptiness represent a transdiagnostic phenomenon that plays a major role in clinical practice, but has so far been insufficiently addressed by psychometrics. The recently developed Subjective Emptiness Scale (SES) is a user-friendly measure that fills this gap. In this study, the German version of the SES was psychometrically evaluated in a rather large general population sample.Respondents from a sample representative of the German general population (N=2508) completed the SES and other instruments to measure psychological distress. The eval-uation included a confirmatory factor analysis, calculation of test statistics (e. g., item-total correlations, internal consistency) and correlation analyses of the sum score with sociodemographic and clinical variables. In addition, age- and gender-specific norm values were determined in the form of T-values.The SES demonstrated a unidimensional factor structure with good model fit (CFI=0.999; TLI=0.998) and excellent internal consistency (McDonald's ω=0.92). Corrected item-total correlation was above 0.75 in all instances. Significant positive correlations of the sum score were found with depression and anxiety symptoms, providing evidence for criterion validity. Normative T-scores were established for age groups and gender; an SES value of 11 can be considered to be markedly increased (T<sub>70</sub>).The German version of the SES proves to be a reliable and potentially valid instrument for measuring subjective emptiness. For a further analysis of its clinical applicability and the definition of clinically relevant threshold values, studies in clinical samples are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Can Emptiness be measured? The Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Subjective Emptiness Scale].\",\"authors\":\"Naomi Johanna Seifert, Laura Lübke, Johannes Zimmermann, Christopher J Hopwood, Elmar Brähler, Matthias Volz, Cord Benecke, Carsten Spitzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2703-2617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Subjective feelings of inner emptiness represent a transdiagnostic phenomenon that plays a major role in clinical practice, but has so far been insufficiently addressed by psychometrics. The recently developed Subjective Emptiness Scale (SES) is a user-friendly measure that fills this gap. In this study, the German version of the SES was psychometrically evaluated in a rather large general population sample.Respondents from a sample representative of the German general population (N=2508) completed the SES and other instruments to measure psychological distress. The eval-uation included a confirmatory factor analysis, calculation of test statistics (e. g., item-total correlations, internal consistency) and correlation analyses of the sum score with sociodemographic and clinical variables. In addition, age- and gender-specific norm values were determined in the form of T-values.The SES demonstrated a unidimensional factor structure with good model fit (CFI=0.999; TLI=0.998) and excellent internal consistency (McDonald's ω=0.92). Corrected item-total correlation was above 0.75 in all instances. Significant positive correlations of the sum score were found with depression and anxiety symptoms, providing evidence for criterion validity. Normative T-scores were established for age groups and gender; an SES value of 11 can be considered to be markedly increased (T<sub>70</sub>).The German version of the SES proves to be a reliable and potentially valid instrument for measuring subjective emptiness. For a further analysis of its clinical applicability and the definition of clinically relevant threshold values, studies in clinical samples are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2703-2617\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2703-2617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内心空虚的主观感受是一种跨诊断现象,在临床实践中发挥着重要作用,但迄今为止心理测量学尚未充分解决。最近开发的主观空虚量表(SES)是一种用户友好的测量方法,填补了这一空白。在这项研究中,德国版的SES在相当大的一般人群样本中进行了心理测量学评估。来自德国普通人群样本代表(N=2508)的受访者完成了SES和其他测量心理困扰的工具。评价包括验证性因子分析、检验统计量的计算(如:(项目-总相关性,内部一致性)以及总得分与社会人口学和临床变量的相关性分析。此外,年龄和性别特定的规范值以t值的形式确定。该指标具有一维因子结构,模型拟合良好(CFI=0.999; TLI=0.998),内部一致性良好(McDonald's ω=0.92)。在所有情况下,修正后的项目总数相关性都在0.75以上。总得分与抑郁和焦虑症状呈显著正相关,为标准效度提供了证据。建立了年龄组和性别的标准t分数;SES值为11可认为显著增高(T70)。德国版的SES被证明是一种可靠的、潜在有效的测量主观空虚的工具。为了进一步分析其临床适用性和临床相关阈值的定义,需要在临床样本中进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Can Emptiness be measured? The Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Subjective Emptiness Scale].

Subjective feelings of inner emptiness represent a transdiagnostic phenomenon that plays a major role in clinical practice, but has so far been insufficiently addressed by psychometrics. The recently developed Subjective Emptiness Scale (SES) is a user-friendly measure that fills this gap. In this study, the German version of the SES was psychometrically evaluated in a rather large general population sample.Respondents from a sample representative of the German general population (N=2508) completed the SES and other instruments to measure psychological distress. The eval-uation included a confirmatory factor analysis, calculation of test statistics (e. g., item-total correlations, internal consistency) and correlation analyses of the sum score with sociodemographic and clinical variables. In addition, age- and gender-specific norm values were determined in the form of T-values.The SES demonstrated a unidimensional factor structure with good model fit (CFI=0.999; TLI=0.998) and excellent internal consistency (McDonald's ω=0.92). Corrected item-total correlation was above 0.75 in all instances. Significant positive correlations of the sum score were found with depression and anxiety symptoms, providing evidence for criterion validity. Normative T-scores were established for age groups and gender; an SES value of 11 can be considered to be markedly increased (T70).The German version of the SES proves to be a reliable and potentially valid instrument for measuring subjective emptiness. For a further analysis of its clinical applicability and the definition of clinically relevant threshold values, studies in clinical samples are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信