[不同结构层次的冲突动态- OPD-3中冲突与结构之间的关系]。

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Philipp Wülfing, Larissa Vierl, Matthias Volz, Florian Juen, Susanne Hörz-Sagstetter, Cord Benecke, Carsten Spitzer
{"title":"[不同结构层次的冲突动态- OPD-3中冲突与结构之间的关系]。","authors":"Philipp Wülfing, Larissa Vierl, Matthias Volz, Florian Juen, Susanne Hörz-Sagstetter, Cord Benecke, Carsten Spitzer","doi":"10.1055/a-2599-8127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD) system extends the descriptive classification systems (e. g. DSM, ICD) of mental disorders and is well established in psychodynamic research and practice. With the 3rd version published in 2023, the OPD underwent a comprehensive revision, which also includes a stronger linking of the axes. Until OPD-3, the 'conflict' and 'structure' axes were considered separately, which resulted in a fragmentation of psychodynamic understanding. The OPD-3 changes this separation by now assessing conflicts at all levels of structural integration, which enables a more integrative view. In this study, the relationships between the conflicts and their coping modes were analyzed as a function of structural impairment (low vs. severely impaired). The study comprised two clinical subsamples with a total of N=3678 psychotherapy patients (N=1645 inpatients; N=2032 outpatients). Psychodynamic conflicts were assessed using the OPD conflict questionnaire (OPD-CQ), while the OPD structural questionnaire (OPD-SQS) was used to assess structural integration. The sample was divided using a median split on the OPD-SQS (Md=24). There were no group differences for the intraindividual variability measure in the OPD-KF or in the network models (network invariance test). Our results confirm the conceptual extensions of OPD-3: conflicts can be identified and differentiated also in patients with more severe structural impairments and the relationships between the conflicts remain stable regardless of the level of structural integration. These findings have relevant implications for psychodynamic diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":" ","pages":"403-410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Conflict dynamics at different structural levels - Relationship between conflict and structure in the OPD-3].\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Wülfing, Larissa Vierl, Matthias Volz, Florian Juen, Susanne Hörz-Sagstetter, Cord Benecke, Carsten Spitzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2599-8127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD) system extends the descriptive classification systems (e. g. DSM, ICD) of mental disorders and is well established in psychodynamic research and practice. With the 3rd version published in 2023, the OPD underwent a comprehensive revision, which also includes a stronger linking of the axes. Until OPD-3, the 'conflict' and 'structure' axes were considered separately, which resulted in a fragmentation of psychodynamic understanding. The OPD-3 changes this separation by now assessing conflicts at all levels of structural integration, which enables a more integrative view. In this study, the relationships between the conflicts and their coping modes were analyzed as a function of structural impairment (low vs. severely impaired). The study comprised two clinical subsamples with a total of N=3678 psychotherapy patients (N=1645 inpatients; N=2032 outpatients). Psychodynamic conflicts were assessed using the OPD conflict questionnaire (OPD-CQ), while the OPD structural questionnaire (OPD-SQS) was used to assess structural integration. The sample was divided using a median split on the OPD-SQS (Md=24). There were no group differences for the intraindividual variability measure in the OPD-KF or in the network models (network invariance test). Our results confirm the conceptual extensions of OPD-3: conflicts can be identified and differentiated also in patients with more severe structural impairments and the relationships between the conflicts remain stable regardless of the level of structural integration. These findings have relevant implications for psychodynamic diagnosis and treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"403-410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2599-8127\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2599-8127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

操作性心理动力学诊断(OPD)系统扩展了描述性分类系统(例如:DSM, ICD),在心理动力学研究和实践中得到了很好的建立。随着2023年发布的第三版,OPD进行了全面修订,其中还包括更强的轴连接。在OPD-3之前,“冲突”和“结构”轴是分开考虑的,这导致了心理动力学理解的碎片化。OPD-3现在通过评估所有层次结构集成的冲突改变了这种分离,这使得一个更综合的视图成为可能。本研究分析了冲突与应对方式之间的关系,并将其作为结构障碍(低与严重)的函数进行分析。本研究包括两个临床亚样本,共N=3678名心理治疗患者(N=1645名住院患者;N = 2032门诊)。采用OPD冲突问卷(OPD- cq)评估心理动力冲突,采用OPD结构问卷(OPD- sqs)评估结构整合。样本在OPD-SQS上采用中位数分割(Md=24)。在OPD-KF或网络模型(网络不变性检验)中,个体内变异性测量没有组间差异。我们的研究结果证实了OPD-3的概念延伸:冲突也可以在更严重的结构障碍患者中被识别和区分,并且无论结构整合水平如何,冲突之间的关系都保持稳定。这些发现对心理动力学诊断和治疗具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Conflict dynamics at different structural levels - Relationship between conflict and structure in the OPD-3].

The Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD) system extends the descriptive classification systems (e. g. DSM, ICD) of mental disorders and is well established in psychodynamic research and practice. With the 3rd version published in 2023, the OPD underwent a comprehensive revision, which also includes a stronger linking of the axes. Until OPD-3, the 'conflict' and 'structure' axes were considered separately, which resulted in a fragmentation of psychodynamic understanding. The OPD-3 changes this separation by now assessing conflicts at all levels of structural integration, which enables a more integrative view. In this study, the relationships between the conflicts and their coping modes were analyzed as a function of structural impairment (low vs. severely impaired). The study comprised two clinical subsamples with a total of N=3678 psychotherapy patients (N=1645 inpatients; N=2032 outpatients). Psychodynamic conflicts were assessed using the OPD conflict questionnaire (OPD-CQ), while the OPD structural questionnaire (OPD-SQS) was used to assess structural integration. The sample was divided using a median split on the OPD-SQS (Md=24). There were no group differences for the intraindividual variability measure in the OPD-KF or in the network models (network invariance test). Our results confirm the conceptual extensions of OPD-3: conflicts can be identified and differentiated also in patients with more severe structural impairments and the relationships between the conflicts remain stable regardless of the level of structural integration. These findings have relevant implications for psychodynamic diagnosis and treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信