[风险指数作为心身康复效果的预测指标:风险指数高或中等的个体从康复中获益吗?]]

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Axel Kobelt-Pönicke, Esther Kobelt
{"title":"[风险指数作为心身康复效果的预测指标:风险指数高或中等的个体从康复中获益吗?]]","authors":"Axel Kobelt-Pönicke, Esther Kobelt","doi":"10.1055/a-2703-8021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic validity of the risk index for predicting the effectiveness of medical-psychosomatic rehabilitation treatments. Specifically, it was investigated whether the risk index contributes additional explanatory value beyond sick leave duration in the year preceding rehabilitation. Sociodemographic, clinical, and motivational differences between risk groups were also analyzed.This retrospective study was based on data from 725 patients treated at a rehabilitation center between September 2022 and December 2023. Participants were categorized by risk level (high, medium, low). Measures included depression severity (PHQ-9), work motivation (DIAMO), subjective return-to-work expectations (SPE), and social-medical assessments. Statistical analyses included ANOVAs, multiple and logistic regressions, and the Reliable Change Index.The high-risk group was older, more frequently female, and more likely to have been on extended sick leave. They reported poorer subjective and social-medical return-to-work expectations, lower work motivation, more avoidant behavior, and reduced participation capabilities. The risk index significantly predicted depression severity at discharge, though less strongly than prior depression levels and sick leave duration. It did not significantly predict return-to-work status at discharge.The risk index provides additional value in predicting psychological treatment outcomes, but not in forecasting work ability. Clinically relevant differences in motivation, participation assessment, and return-to-work expectations in the high-risk group underline the need for targeted early interventions. Conclusion While useful for identifying vulnerable groups, the risk index does not replace individualized assessments of occupational and psychological burdens. Early recognition and promotion of motivational and functional resources are essential for successful rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The risk index as a predictor of the effectiveness of psychosomatic rehabilitation: do individuals with a high or moderate risk index benefit from rehabilitation?]\",\"authors\":\"Axel Kobelt-Pönicke, Esther Kobelt\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2703-8021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic validity of the risk index for predicting the effectiveness of medical-psychosomatic rehabilitation treatments. Specifically, it was investigated whether the risk index contributes additional explanatory value beyond sick leave duration in the year preceding rehabilitation. Sociodemographic, clinical, and motivational differences between risk groups were also analyzed.This retrospective study was based on data from 725 patients treated at a rehabilitation center between September 2022 and December 2023. Participants were categorized by risk level (high, medium, low). Measures included depression severity (PHQ-9), work motivation (DIAMO), subjective return-to-work expectations (SPE), and social-medical assessments. Statistical analyses included ANOVAs, multiple and logistic regressions, and the Reliable Change Index.The high-risk group was older, more frequently female, and more likely to have been on extended sick leave. They reported poorer subjective and social-medical return-to-work expectations, lower work motivation, more avoidant behavior, and reduced participation capabilities. The risk index significantly predicted depression severity at discharge, though less strongly than prior depression levels and sick leave duration. It did not significantly predict return-to-work status at discharge.The risk index provides additional value in predicting psychological treatment outcomes, but not in forecasting work ability. Clinically relevant differences in motivation, participation assessment, and return-to-work expectations in the high-risk group underline the need for targeted early interventions. Conclusion While useful for identifying vulnerable groups, the risk index does not replace individualized assessments of occupational and psychological burdens. Early recognition and promotion of motivational and functional resources are essential for successful rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2703-8021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2703-8021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨风险指数预测医学-心身康复治疗效果的预后效度。具体而言,研究了风险指数在康复前一年的病假时间之外是否有额外的解释价值。社会人口学、临床和动机方面的差异也被分析。这项回顾性研究基于2022年9月至2023年12月期间在康复中心接受治疗的725名患者的数据。参与者按风险等级(高、中、低)进行分类。测量包括抑郁严重程度(PHQ-9)、工作动机(DIAMO)、主观重返工作期望(SPE)和社会医学评估。统计分析包括方差分析、多元回归和逻辑回归以及可靠变化指数。高风险人群年龄更大,女性更常见,而且更有可能长期请病假。他们报告了较差的主观和社会医疗重返工作的期望,较低的工作动机,更多的逃避行为,和较低的参与能力。风险指数显著预测出院时的抑郁严重程度,但低于先前的抑郁水平和病假时间。它不能显著预测出院后的重返工作状态。风险指数在预测心理治疗效果方面有附加价值,但在预测工作能力方面无附加价值。高危人群在动机、参与评估和重返工作岗位期望方面的临床相关差异强调了有针对性的早期干预的必要性。结论风险指数虽能有效识别弱势群体,但不能代替个体的职业和心理负担评估。早期认识和促进动机和功能资源对成功康复至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The risk index as a predictor of the effectiveness of psychosomatic rehabilitation: do individuals with a high or moderate risk index benefit from rehabilitation?]

The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic validity of the risk index for predicting the effectiveness of medical-psychosomatic rehabilitation treatments. Specifically, it was investigated whether the risk index contributes additional explanatory value beyond sick leave duration in the year preceding rehabilitation. Sociodemographic, clinical, and motivational differences between risk groups were also analyzed.This retrospective study was based on data from 725 patients treated at a rehabilitation center between September 2022 and December 2023. Participants were categorized by risk level (high, medium, low). Measures included depression severity (PHQ-9), work motivation (DIAMO), subjective return-to-work expectations (SPE), and social-medical assessments. Statistical analyses included ANOVAs, multiple and logistic regressions, and the Reliable Change Index.The high-risk group was older, more frequently female, and more likely to have been on extended sick leave. They reported poorer subjective and social-medical return-to-work expectations, lower work motivation, more avoidant behavior, and reduced participation capabilities. The risk index significantly predicted depression severity at discharge, though less strongly than prior depression levels and sick leave duration. It did not significantly predict return-to-work status at discharge.The risk index provides additional value in predicting psychological treatment outcomes, but not in forecasting work ability. Clinically relevant differences in motivation, participation assessment, and return-to-work expectations in the high-risk group underline the need for targeted early interventions. Conclusion While useful for identifying vulnerable groups, the risk index does not replace individualized assessments of occupational and psychological burdens. Early recognition and promotion of motivational and functional resources are essential for successful rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信