Ecological Psychology最新文献_第3页

Ecological Aesthetics 生态美学

IF 1.9 3区心理学

Ecological Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-29 DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2024.2332760

Julia J. C. Blau

引用次数: 0

The Aesthetic Dimension of Reading: An Embodied-Ecological Approach 阅读的审美维度：体现生态学方法

IF 1.9 3区心理学

Ecological Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-18 DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2024.2329188

Juan Toro, Sarah Bro Trasmundi

引用次数: 0

The Problem of Coordination in Movement and Art 运动与艺术中的协调问题

IF 1.9 3区心理学

Ecological Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-13 DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2024.2327351

Nathaniel F. Barrett

引用次数: 0

The Visual Information Available in Virtual Reality 虚拟现实技术提供的视觉信息

IF 1.9 3区心理学

Ecological Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-03 DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2024.2322992

Edward Baggs, Paweł Grabarczyk, Zuzanna Rucińska

引用次数: 0

The Haptic Moving Room 触觉移动室

IF 1.9 3区心理学

Ecological Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-03 DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2024.2319351

Carlos de Paz, Nicole S. Carver, Scott G. Fasone, Jorge Ibáñez-Gijón, David M. Jacobs, Paula L. Silva

引用次数: 0

Multifractal Auditory Stimulation Promotes the Effect of Multifractal Torso Sway on Spatial Perception: Evidence from Distance Perception by Blindwalking 多重分形听觉刺激促进多重分形躯干摇摆对空间感知的影响——来自盲行距离感知的证据

IF 1.9 3区心理学

Ecological Psychology Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2023.2287752

Damian Kelty-Stephen, Oliver Drew Similton, Emma Rabinowitz, Marty Allen

引用次数: 0

Attractive Stepping Stones Landscapes: Preference for Stone Height Variation Appears to Be Age Independent 有吸引力的踏脚石景观:对石头高度变化的偏好似乎与年龄无关

IF 1.9 3区心理学

Ecological Psychology Pub Date : 2023-08-09 DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2023.2235621

A. M. Jeschke, R. Withagen, F. Zaal, S. Caljouw

{"title":"Attractive Stepping Stones Landscapes: Preference for Stone Height Variation Appears to Be Age Independent","authors":"A. M. Jeschke, R. Withagen, F. Zaal, S. Caljouw","doi":"10.1080/10407413.2023.2235621","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2023.2235621","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract An earlier study on the attractiveness of stepping stones configurations revealed that children like variation in stone height better than variation in stone size or gap width. In the present study, we conducted two experiments to examine whether this preference is found also in young and older adults. In Experiment 1, participants stepped freely in a standardized configuration, and three configurations with either height, size or gap width variation. Most interestingly, adults judged playgrounds with variation in stone height as most fun and beautiful, suggesting that the preference for variation in height is indeed age independent. In Experiment 2, we compared the configuration with only height variation with three configurations in which variation in height was combined with variation in stone size or gap width, or both. Although we found no significant differences among the configurations in the older adults, young adults judged the combination of height with size and gap width variation as more fun and esthetically appealing than the configuration with only height variation. The implications of our findings for playground research and designers are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47279,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48060845","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Field of Invitations 邀请的领域

IF 1.9 3区心理学

Ecological Psychology Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2023.2230192

R. Withagen

引用次数: 2

Ecological Optics as the Conceptual Basis for the Interpersonal Self and Social Interaction 生态光学:人际自我与社会互动的概念基础

IF 1.9 3区心理学

Ecological Psychology Pub Date : 2023-04-05 DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2023.2193173

Nam-Gyoon Kim, J. Effken, Ho-Won Lee

{"title":"Ecological Optics as the Conceptual Basis for the Interpersonal Self and Social Interaction","authors":"Nam-Gyoon Kim, J. Effken, Ho-Won Lee","doi":"10.1080/10407413.2023.2193173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2023.2193173","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Agency, the ability to negotiate one’s surroundings to bring about changes, is the defining feature of animacy. Because agency is embodied in each individual’s self, inquiry into agency is necessarily an inquiry into selfhood. William James divided selfhood into the self as “I” and the self as “me” with the I self being, in essence, an active agent responsible for thoughts and actions. In Gibson’s ecological paradigm, self plays a central role, being co-perceived with the environment. Neisser (1988), an advocate of Gibson, classified self via 5 different forms of self–knowledge, each portraying a different aspect of self. Of these, the ecological self is an agent that regulates its encounters with the surroundings based on affordances the environment offers, whereas the interpersonal self is an agent that interacts with conspecifics based on the mutual affordances their interactions offer. For interpersonal selves to interact effectively with each other necessitates that their shared environment becomes common knowledge to all participants, based on information determined in accordance with the principle of ecological optics (in particular, information about occluding edges, reversible occlusion, and opaque and non-opaque substances). We suggest that Gibson’s principles of ecological optics be extended to the social domain, as he envisioned.","PeriodicalId":47279,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44475176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Investigating What Variables People Pick Up When Perceiving Other People’s Maximum Vertical One Degree-of-Freedom Reach Heights to Inform the Design of Assistive Robots 研究人们在感知他人最大垂直自由度到达高度时所拾取的变量，为辅助机器人的设计提供信息

IF 1.9 3区心理学

Ecological Psychology Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10407413.2023.2192200

Keith S. Jones, Nicholas A. Garcia, Dana Wilder

{"title":"Investigating What Variables People Pick Up When Perceiving Other People’s Maximum Vertical One Degree-of-Freedom Reach Heights to Inform the Design of Assistive Robots","authors":"Keith S. Jones, Nicholas A. Garcia, Dana Wilder","doi":"10.1080/10407413.2023.2192200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2023.2192200","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We aim to design assistive robots that perceive people’s affordances in ways that are similar to how people perceive other people’s affordances. Toward that end, two experiments investigated what variables people pick up when perceiving actors’ maximum vertical one degree-of-freedom reach heights. In Experiment 1, point-light displays depicted actors who moved, were either tall or short, and had markers placed on either their whole body (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, hands, hips, knees, & ankles), upper body (head, shoulders, elbows, wrists, & hands), lower body (hips, knees, & ankles), or ankles. Participants instructed the experimenter to adjust an object’s height so that it was just reachable. Experiment 2 was identical except actors moved or were still. In both experiments, judgment error for the Full Body condition was not significantly different from that for the Upper or Lower Body conditions, but was significantly different from that for the Ankles condition. In Experiment 2, that result replicated when actors moved and when they were still. These results suggest participants may have picked up object height in relation to actor height. Implications about how people perceive other people’s maximum vertical one degree-of-freedom reach heights and how that might inform assistive robot design are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47279,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44175402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0