{"title":"冷熵:评估冷应激中认知适应性的个体差异","authors":"T. Dunn, Douglas M. Jones, J. Heaney","doi":"10.1080/10407413.2022.2055473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Human cognition unfolds in a multitude of environments, including those that are associated with extreme stressors. Successfully measuring and modeling behaviors in such environments is inherently difficult. The current effort aimed to assess variation in stability and flexibility of cognitive performance during cold stress, individual differences in errors, and physiological correlates. Fifty-seven service members completed cold water immersion during winter months. Individuals were required to immerse themselves in an outdoor pond for 10 minutes, reclothe into dry clothing, and attempt to rewarm. Simple reaction time and match-to-sample tasks were completed throughout the 90 minute procedure. To assess response stability, sample entropy was computed for the response time time-series of each task. Hierarchical clustering applied to sample entropy values identified two clusters of individuals. One highly affected group demonstrated low stability and weak flexibility by way of higher autocorrelation and more omission errors, and had lower hand temperature pre- and post-immersion. Results are discussed within the context of cold stress, adaptive behaviors, and cold stress.","PeriodicalId":47279,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cold Entropy: Assessing Individual Differences in Cognitive Adaptability during Cold Stress\",\"authors\":\"T. Dunn, Douglas M. Jones, J. Heaney\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10407413.2022.2055473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Human cognition unfolds in a multitude of environments, including those that are associated with extreme stressors. Successfully measuring and modeling behaviors in such environments is inherently difficult. The current effort aimed to assess variation in stability and flexibility of cognitive performance during cold stress, individual differences in errors, and physiological correlates. Fifty-seven service members completed cold water immersion during winter months. Individuals were required to immerse themselves in an outdoor pond for 10 minutes, reclothe into dry clothing, and attempt to rewarm. Simple reaction time and match-to-sample tasks were completed throughout the 90 minute procedure. To assess response stability, sample entropy was computed for the response time time-series of each task. Hierarchical clustering applied to sample entropy values identified two clusters of individuals. One highly affected group demonstrated low stability and weak flexibility by way of higher autocorrelation and more omission errors, and had lower hand temperature pre- and post-immersion. Results are discussed within the context of cold stress, adaptive behaviors, and cold stress.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2022.2055473\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2022.2055473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cold Entropy: Assessing Individual Differences in Cognitive Adaptability during Cold Stress
Abstract Human cognition unfolds in a multitude of environments, including those that are associated with extreme stressors. Successfully measuring and modeling behaviors in such environments is inherently difficult. The current effort aimed to assess variation in stability and flexibility of cognitive performance during cold stress, individual differences in errors, and physiological correlates. Fifty-seven service members completed cold water immersion during winter months. Individuals were required to immerse themselves in an outdoor pond for 10 minutes, reclothe into dry clothing, and attempt to rewarm. Simple reaction time and match-to-sample tasks were completed throughout the 90 minute procedure. To assess response stability, sample entropy was computed for the response time time-series of each task. Hierarchical clustering applied to sample entropy values identified two clusters of individuals. One highly affected group demonstrated low stability and weak flexibility by way of higher autocorrelation and more omission errors, and had lower hand temperature pre- and post-immersion. Results are discussed within the context of cold stress, adaptive behaviors, and cold stress.
期刊介绍:
This unique journal publishes original articles that contribute to the understanding of psychological and behavioral processes as they occur within the ecological constraints of animal-environment systems. It focuses on problems of perception, action, cognition, communication, learning, development, and evolution in all species, to the extent that those problems derive from a consideration of whole animal-environment systems, rather than animals or their environments in isolation from each other. Significant contributions may come from such diverse fields as human experimental psychology, developmental/social psychology, animal behavior, human factors, fine arts, communication, computer science, philosophy, physical education and therapy, speech and hearing, and vision research.