Ludovico Bullini Orlandi , Gianluca Veronesi , Alessandro Zardini
{"title":"Unpacking linguistic devices and discursive strategies in online social movement organizations: Evidence from anti-vaccine online communities","authors":"Ludovico Bullini Orlandi , Gianluca Veronesi , Alessandro Zardini","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100409","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100409","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates linguistic devices and discursive strategies employed by online social movement organizations (SMOs) in attempts to deinstitutionalize long-standing, institutionalized behaviors. The research draws from an in-depth analysis of public discourse within anti-vaccine online communities in Italy and contributes to the social movement literature on framing and the theory of discursive institutionalization. It employs semi-automated text-analysis methods and interpretive analysis of textual data from seven anti-vaccine social media communities, before and subsequent to the 2017 regulatory intervention of the Italian government to increase vaccination rates. This intervention followed a phase of intense debate centered on the decrease in vaccination coverage and the spread of anti-vaccine ideas in social media as well as in the broader public discourse. The study analyzes the discursive strategies and linguistic devices of community leaders (moderators) and followers (members), and investigates shifts in micro-level online anti-vaccine discursive strategies that developed after the government regulation. The findings suggest that anti-vaccine online SMOs employ specific sets of linguistic devices, namely rhetorical fallacies, that support well-defined discursive strategies such as those aiming to delegitimize actors that endorse vaccines. Furthermore, the evidence shows that these linguistic devices and discursive strategies, after the government regulation, shift from an evidence-based stance towards values and emotions-based argumentations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"32 2","pages":"Article 100409"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50165773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The digital is different: Emergence and relationality in critical realist research","authors":"Alexander Moltubakk Kempton","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100408","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100408","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When analyzing empirical phenomena, the implicit or explicit assumptions we have of relationality guide what we take as the primary units of analysis and how we study them. This paper investigates and expands on the notion of relationality and relational explanations in the Critical Realist (CR) paradigm of Information Systems (IS) research. As digital technologies are becoming increasingly adaptive to the social and socio-technical structures they are embedded in, it is necessary to expand the field's conceptual tools in its study of digital phenomena. Therefore, to explain why the digital seems more tightly coupled to social phenomena than other types of technologies, the concept of transformational emergence is introduced. The key argument is that the malleability of digital entities entails that they are disposed to transform by emergence, which is key to understanding the constitutive relationality between the social and the technical in contemporary digital phenomena. This has fundamental implications for CR-based theories in the IS field, most notably Affordance theory and Representation theory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"32 2","pages":"Article 100408"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471772722000215/pdfft?md5=1f4f39a205fdd551050fca9101671e7f&pid=1-s2.0-S1471772722000215-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50165776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Coordinating knowledge work across technologies: Evidence from critical care practices","authors":"Maria Festila , Sune Dueholm Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100411","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100411","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines how heterogeneous technologies impact the coordination of knowledge work in complex socio-technical settings. It is based on an in-depth field study of critical care practices characterized by intensive knowledge work and technological heterogeneity. We observe that heterogeneous technologies create workflow gaps within which health professionals adapt technology use to contingencies and local needs, prioritize interventions, and identify problems before they become detrimental to patient care. These adaptations provide opportunities for health professionals to continuously align work across heterogeneous technologies and to accomplish broader professional and ideological goals. Our analysis shows that health professionals use three coordination practices when working across heterogeneous technologies: controlling and enhancing information, reconstructing workflows, and circumventing requirements. We theorize how these practices address coordination needs associated with heterogeneous technologies and discuss implications for knowledge work. We provide a more complete understanding of coordination practices in complex, socio-technical settings which contributes to both knowledge work and coordination literatures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"32 2","pages":"Article 100411"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50165770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Managing paradoxical tensions in the development of a telemedicine system","authors":"Neha Agarwal , Christina Soh , Adrian Yeow","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100393","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100393","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The global pandemic has escalated the demand for telemedicine systems across the world, particularly for vulnerable populations such as the elderly in nursing homes. However, challenges in implementation and high failure rates continue to affect the sustainability and capability of telemedicine systems. This study therefore addresses the question of how to sustain and develop telemedicine systems, and offers a conceptual model developed from </span>longitudinal study data and paradox theory. We found that in the inter-organizational context of telemedicine systems, paradoxical tensions arise from conflict between demands and interests of the telemedicine system versus those of its members. We also identified </span><em>when</em><span> the specific tensions of belonging, learning, organizing, and performing are likely to occur. These tensions are addressed through responses, initiated by the hub, that address both system and member level demands and interests through creating collaborative governance, uplifting member capabilities, and targeted resourcing. We further demonstrate the temporal dynamics of how the hub's responses create inter-organizational norms and structures that in turn influence responses to tensions in subsequent phases. We examined variations in members' reactions to the responses, and found that they were influenced by member-specific resource factors, suggesting that while the hub does sustain the development of the telemedicine system through addressing common member demands, there are limits with regard to aspects that are more member-specific. Finally, we show how technology can be both enabler-trigger and enabler-response due to its inherent attributes of malleability and reconfigurability.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"32 1","pages":"Article 100393"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50165924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Legitimating digital technologies in industry exchange fields: The case of digital signatures","authors":"Laila Dahabiyeh , Panos Constantinides","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100392","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100392","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Emergent digital technologies need to be legitimated for them to enable new marketplaces to diffuse and scale. The extant literature has emphasized the role of discourse in framing legitimation efforts. Despite recognizing the broader role of technology in the legitimation process, these studies have not examined the specific affordances of digital technologies used by field members and also how this relates to the institutional infrastructure of the field to influence the legitimation process. In our study of an </span>industry exchange field, we drew on </span>archival data between 1997 and 2001 to examine how members of the then emergent e-commerce industry exchange field achieved legitimation of digital signatures in electronic transactions through legislation. Our research contributes to </span>extant research by showing how the legitimation process involves invoking and scaling affordances through sensegiving, translating, and decoupling mechanisms. We also show how affordances are conditioned by the specific institutional infrastructure that supports and enables them, and how issue fields can arise within exchange fields as spaces to (re)negotiate and shape institutional changes. We conclude with implications for further research into the diffusion and scale of digital marketplaces that is of increasing importance in light of recent regulatory debates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"32 1","pages":"Article 100392"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50165925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Helping at NASA: Guidelines for using process consultation to develop impactful research","authors":"Loizos Heracleous","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100388","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100388","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Management research has long been criticized for its perceived lack of relevance or impact beyond academia. How can we, as management scholars, create research that is more relevant and impactful? I argue that Edgar Schein's process consultation approach can be part of the answer. Process consultation's ultimate aim is to help client organizations. Key aspects of what is now recognized as engaged scholarship were fundamental to process consultation even before engaged scholarship was part of the management vocabulary. Based on my engagement process with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration since 2013, I argue that trust can fruitfully be seen as an outcome and an enabler of productive long-term helping relationships and of engaged scholarship; that what I call <em>pragmatic bricolage</em> is important in terms of offering help based on the client's needs as they develop at different junctures; and that unexpected dilemmas in such relationships are inevitable, but ways forward can be found by applying key principles of social systems. I conclude by outlining guidelines for impactful research and for disseminating research to wider audiences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"32 1","pages":"Article 100388"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147177272200001X/pdfft?md5=abcea71bb6da557ba7a811e64d0debd9&pid=1-s2.0-S147177272200001X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50165934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Organizational scandal on social media: Workers whistleblowing on YouTube and Facebook","authors":"Tamar Lazar","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100390","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100390","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The paper explores the emergence of organizational scandals on social media, and how the communicative dynamics of such scandals evolve as a social drama. I propose that when whistleblowers utilize information technologies to expose evidence of organizational misconduct, they, and their audiences, engage in </span><em>meta- organizational discourse</em>: The reflexive – immediate and durational – interactions through which organizational stakeholders instigate organizational scandals on social media, negotiate the normative boundaries of whistleblowing, and (de)legitimize the act of disclosing managerial transgressions online. I examine an organizational scandal embedded in the recent wave of workers’ unionization struggles in Israel in which whistleblowers performed the role of investigative journalists by posting a video on YouTube exposing a senior manager trying to dissuade workers from joining the union. Following that, on workers’ unionization Facebook pages, union supporters and opponents vigorously deliberated the intentions and consequences of publicly shaming their manager and damaging the reputation of their company. Analyzing workers’ discourse suggests that participants from both sides experienced the scandal as something that affected all company employees. They acknowledged the high visibility of their social drama and recognized the potential impact of whistleblowing online across organizational spatial and temporal boundaries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"32 1","pages":"Article 100390"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50165931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Figuring out IT markets: How and why industry analysts launch, adjust and abandon categories","authors":"Neil Pollock, Robin Williams, Luciana D'Adderio","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100389","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100389","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite being a source of significant change, there has been little focus on how and why industry analysts constantly launch, adjust and abandon market-defining categories. To address this issue, we investigate the Big Three industry analyst firms and find that they promote categories clients find valuable and adjust or abandon those no longer attracting attention. Bringing together insights from information systems research and category scholarship, we show that industry analysts ensure their expertise is seen as relevant to clients through material and visual processes theorised as category-work, figuring-work, and client-mapping, which together create client-induced categories’. This novel theorisation throws light on the processes market intermediaries use to align categories with client concerns and how incorporating categories in graphical figurations can intensify the cycle of category creation and abandonment. It also enhances understanding of the dynamics surrounding transitory terminologies and opens up new research opportunities for studying IT markets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"32 1","pages":"Article 100389"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471772722000021/pdfft?md5=770c91d1e291abf579644cb7d4a2fcb2&pid=1-s2.0-S1471772722000021-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"109128870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Crowdworkers, social affirmation and work identity: Rethinking dominant assumptions of crowdwork1","authors":"Ayomikun Idowu , Amany Elbanna","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100335","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100335","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Crowdwork is becoming increasingly popular as evidenced by its rapid growth. It is a new way of working that is conducted through global digital platforms where money is exchanged for services provided online. As it is digitally grounded, it has been assumed to be context-free, uniform and consisting of a simple exchange of tasks/labour from a global workforce for direct monetary pay. In this study, we examine these dominant, largely Western assumptions from crowdworkers' perspective and turn to a non-Western context to destabilise them. We adopt an inductive research approach using multiple sources of qualitative data including interviews, participant observations, documents review, observation of social media chat rooms and online forums. The study reveals that as they lack organisational, occupational and professional context and referent, crowdworkers rely on social affirmation in the construction of their work identity. They construct a work identity of who they are that cuts across the boundaries between themselves, the digital work they do and their social environment. This constructed work identity then frames how they do crowdwork and their relationships with digital platforms and employers. This study advances theories about crowdwork contesting the dominant assumptions and showing that it is not context free, neither it is a simple exchange of labour. Further, it shows that the construction of a crowdwork identity in context plays a significant role in shaping the way this digitally-grounded work is conducted and managed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"31 4","pages":"Article 100335"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100335","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122098364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Distributed seeing: Algorithms and the reconfiguration of the workplace, a case of 'automated' trading","authors":"Thijs Willems , Ella Hafermalz","doi":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100376","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100376","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Contemporary organizations increasingly rely on digital technologies structuring how work gets done. Algorithms in particular are fundamental for such technologies. Management literature on digital transformation has studied how algorithms either automate or augment work. In doing so, this literature treats algorithms as largely independent from existing work practices. This paper, on the contrary, theorizes and empirically illustrates how algorithms transform the workplace in a spatiotemporal sense by introducing a new epistemic vantage point through which work is understood. We do so by drawing on previous work on reconfiguration and ‘Ways of Seeing’, and through a qualitative case study on sports trading. Our analysis shows that traders and algorithms each perceive and see the market in specific, though incomplete ways. Since this market is partly virtual and constituted via a range of heterogeneous actors, ‘seeing’ the market entails knowing its distributed nature and pulling spatiotemporal distant elements together. Our paper contributes to the literature on the effects of algorithms on work by putting forward the conceptual lens of ‘distributed seeing’. This highlights that digital transformation is more than an instrumental optimization process by automating or augmenting tasks with technology but that it actively reconfigures the work to be done. We show that digital transformation 1) is reciprocal and thus irreversible; 2) patchworked and thus requires mending work; 3) introduces new organizational vulnerabilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47253,"journal":{"name":"Information and Organization","volume":"31 4","pages":"Article 100376"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50165966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}