CLASSICAL QUARTERLY最新文献_第3页

N. HEINSIUS'S FRAGMENTVM CAESENAS OF OVID'S METAMORPHOSES REDISCOVERED 1 N.海因修斯的碎片vm重新发现了奥维德变形的凯撒1

IF 0.2 3区历史学

CLASSICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2016-04-20 DOI: 10.1017/S0009838816000264

Luis Rivero García

{"title":"N. HEINSIUS'S FRAGMENTVM CAESENAS OF OVID'S METAMORPHOSES REDISCOVERED 1","authors":"Luis Rivero García","doi":"10.1017/S0009838816000264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838816000264","url":null,"abstract":"Among the manuscripts of Ovid's Metamorphoses used by N. Heinsius (1620–1681) and as yet unidentified or given up for lost is the so-called fragmentum Caesenas (Cs), the collation of which was not carried out by Heinsius himself but provided for him by the Hamburg jurist Lucas Langermann (1625–1686), who was a correspondent of Heinsius, Gronovius and Vossius, among others. According to M.D. Reeve, he was also responsible for adding these notes, using the siglum c, to Oxon. Bodl. Auct. S.V.5, which also includes the collations—by another hand—of A (= Vrbinas ueterrimus, our V2) and B (= Berneggerianus, our P2). The variants provided by this fragment affect lines 9.235–11.169 and 13.1–403, although this does not imply that these were the exact limits of its content, as we shall see below. Some of these variants ended up in the notes of the editions by Heinsius himself and by those who continued his work (the most prominent example being the admirable edition of Ovid by P. Burman, in 1727), and it was D.A. Slater who rescued the collation of Bodl. Auct. S.V.5 from obscurity when he included the greater part of the readings of c (the siglum he himself retains) among the rich store of information presented in his work. F. Munari included the fragment in his catalogue, clearly pointing to the uncertainty surrounding its dating (‘aetatis incertae’, the same expression as used by Slater) while adding the information that it was not at that time to be found in Cesena. The succinct information offered by Slater is used by I. Marahrens for her dissertation and by W.S. Anderson for his edition. R.J. Tarrant, in turn, explicitly states that the fragment is now lost. In the following pages, however, I will attempt to show that this fragment is not lost, but still preserved in the Biblioteca Malatestiana in Cesena.","PeriodicalId":47185,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2016-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0009838816000264","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56743990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

MOUSIKÊ AND MYSTERIES: A NIETZSCHEAN READING OF AESCHYLUS’ BASSARIDES MousikÊ与奥秘:尼采式解读埃斯库罗斯的巴萨里德

IF 0.2 3区历史学

CLASSICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2015-10-01 DOI: 10.1017/S0009838815000154

Sarah Burges Watson

引用次数: 2

A TEXTUAL NOTE TO PLATO, GORGIAS 465a4* 给柏拉图的文本注释，高尔吉亚465a4*

IF 0.2 3区历史学

CLASSICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2015-09-07 DOI: 10.1017/S0009838815000269

Marco Romani Mistretta

引用次数: 0

TWO TEXTUAL PROBLEMS IN BOOK 7 OF VARRO'S DE LINGVA LATINA* 瓦罗的《拉丁语》第7卷中的两个文本问题*

IF 0.2 3区历史学

CLASSICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2015-04-02 DOI: 10.1017/S0009838814000019

W. D. De melo

引用次数: 0

AEQVOR: THE SEA OF PROPHECIES IN VIRGIL'S AENEID* 埃克沃尔:维吉尔的《埃涅伊德》中的预言之海

IF 0.2 3区历史学

CLASSICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2014-11-20 DOI: 10.1017/S0009838814000159

M. G. García Ruiz

引用次数: 0

THE NORMAL ROAD TO GEOMETRY: δή IN EUCLID'S ELEMENTS AND THE MATHEMATICAL COMPETENCE OF HIS AUDIENCE* 通往几何的正常道路:欧几里得的元素和他的听众的数学能力之间的δή *

IF 0.2 3区历史学

CLASSICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2014-11-20 DOI: 10.1017/S0009838814000457

S. L. van der Pas

引用次数: 1

INTRATEXT, DECLAMATION AND DRAMATIC ARGUMENT IN TACITUS' DIALOGUS DE ORATORIBUS 塔克图斯《演说家对话》中的文本内、朗诵与戏剧性论证

IF 0.2 3区历史学

CLASSICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2014-04-16 DOI: 10.1017/S0009838813000736

Christopher S. van den Berg

{"title":"INTRATEXT, DECLAMATION AND DRAMATIC ARGUMENT IN TACITUS' DIALOGUS DE ORATORIBUS","authors":"Christopher S. van den Berg","doi":"10.1017/S0009838813000736","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838813000736","url":null,"abstract":"Tacitus' Dialogus de oratoribus (c. 100 c.e.) may be the most perplexing of the extant Roman dialogues, quite possibly, of the entire Greco-Roman tradition. Despite advances in the rhetorical and literary appreciation of ancient dialogues, this text continues to elude understanding. Oddly, the difficulties stem neither from obscurities of subject matter and presentation nor from any anomalism vis-à-vis the norms of the genre. Six compelling speeches lucidly detail the value, history and development of eloquentia (‘skilled speech’) from the perspective of the late first and early second centuries c.e. They provide convincing accounts of rhetoric and its evolution: the social and political efficacy of eloquentia (Marcus Aper's and Curiatius Maternus' prescriptions on how best to assert oneself with and against the powerful, and the famous yet notoriously tumultuous oratory of the Late Republic), evaluative categories for rhetoric, including the competing discourses that prized renown and canonical status (Vipstanus Messalla's praise of the ancients), or external and absolute aesthetic criteria; and lastly, exemplary instances (e.g. past luminaries) or suitable models for imitation (ancient and modern orators and poets). The richness of these diverse emphases, along with the complex and ambiguous reworking of literary forerunners, not to mention the open-endedness at the work's conclusion, all conspire against the expectation of a uniform message.","PeriodicalId":47185,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2014-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0009838813000736","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56743488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

GALEN, DIVINATION AND THE STATUS OF MEDICINE1 盖伦、占卜与医学的地位

IF 0.2 3区历史学

CLASSICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2014-04-16 DOI: 10.1017/S0009838813000761

Peter van Nuffelen

{"title":"GALEN, DIVINATION AND THE STATUS OF MEDICINE1","authors":"Peter van Nuffelen","doi":"10.1017/S0009838813000761","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838813000761","url":null,"abstract":"Galen's stories about his successes in predicting the development of an illness belong to the best-known anecdotes drawn from his writings. Brilliant pieces of self-presentation, they set Galen apart from his peers, who tried to cover up their ignorance by levelling accusations of magic and divination against their superior colleague. These accusations are usually interpreted as very real threats, as Roman law punished illicit magic and divination. Pointing out that Galen sometimes likes to present himself as a mantis and a prophet, others have suggested that the accusations against Galen and his own self-presentation indicate that the border line between medicine and religion was still fluid. Both approaches correctly draw attention to the social reality that the accusations betray: they suggest that Galen belongs to a group of healers of dubious standing that populated the empire and thus show that medicine did not have a monopoly on healing. Yet such a socio-historical approach may not be sufficient. For one thing, both explanations have their limitations. Regarding the former, it can be said that Augustus' prohibition of divination aimed at controlling prediction about the emperor and one can doubt that a widespread clampdown of all forms of divination ever was intended. A possible objection to the second view is that throughout his oeuvre Galen emphasizes his medicine as a rational undertaking, even as a science (epistêmê). If one takes his self-presentation as a mantis to be more than metaphorical and to indicate the not yet fully crystallized identity of medicine as a separate scientific discipline, then Galen's usual way of understanding his own craft as a ‘science’ is in need of explanation. Besides such possible objections, a different set of questions still needs to be asked: why precisely were accusations of practising magic and divination levelled against Galen and why do they recur so frequently in his writings? Why divination and not, say, poisoning?","PeriodicalId":47185,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2014-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0009838813000761","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56743537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

PROCLUS ON HESIOD'S WORKS AND DAYS AND ‘DIDACTIC’ POETRY 接着是赫西奥德的作品和日子，以及“说教”诗歌

IF 0.2 3区历史学

CLASSICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2014-04-16 DOI: 10.1017/S0009838813000773

R. M. van den Berg

{"title":"PROCLUS ON HESIOD'S WORKS AND DAYS AND ‘DIDACTIC’ POETRY","authors":"R. M. van den Berg","doi":"10.1017/S0009838813000773","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838813000773","url":null,"abstract":"In their introduction to the recent excellent volume Plato & Hesiod, the editors G.R. Boys-Stones and J.H. Haubold observe that when we think about the problematic relationship between Plato and the poets, we tend to narrow this down to that between Plato and Homer. Hesiod is practically ignored. Unjustly so, the editors argue. Hesiod provides a good opportunity to start thinking more broadly about Plato's interaction with poets and poetry, not in the least because the ‘second poet’ of Greece represents a different type of poetry from Homer's heroic epics, that of didactic poetry. What goes for Plato and Hesiod goes for Proclus and Hesiod. Proclus (a.d. 410/12–85), the productive head of the Neoplatonic school in Athens, took a great interest in poetry to which he was far more positively disposed than Plato had ever been. He wrote, for example, two lengthy treatises in reaction to Socrates' devastating criticism of poetry in the Republic as part of his commentary on that work in which he tries to keep the poets within the Platonic pale. This intriguing aspect of Proclus' thought has, as one might expect, not failed to attract scholarly attention. In Proclus' case too, however, discussions tend to concentrate on his attitude towards Homer (one need only think here of Robert Lamberton's stimulating book Homer the Theologian). To some extent this is only to be expected, since much of the discussion in the Commentary on the Republic centres on passages from Homer. Proclus did not, however, disregard Hesiod: we still possess his scholia on the Works and Days, now available in a recent edition by Patrizia Marzillo.","PeriodicalId":47185,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2014-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0009838813000773","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"56743900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

THE ARISTOTELIAN CORPUS AND THE RHODIAN TRADITION: NEW LIGHT FROM POSIDONIUS ON THE TRANSMISSION OF ARISTOTLE'S WORKS* 亚里斯多德语料库与罗得斯传统:波西多尼乌斯对亚里斯多德作品传播的新光*

IF 0.2 3区历史学

CLASSICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2013-11-08 DOI: 10.1017/S0009838813000207

Irene Pajón Leyra

引用次数: 11