Review of Philosophy and Psychology最新文献_第2页

Early Conceptual Knowledge About Food 关于食物的早期概念知识

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-24 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-024-00742-z

Matteo Gandolini, Andrea Borghini, Jérémie Lafraire

引用次数: 0

Where is the Motivation in Motivated Numeracy? 激励式计算的动力何在？

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-024-00737-w

Kathrin Glüer-Pagin, Levi Spectre

引用次数: 0

“I’m Not Hungry:” Bodily Representations and Bodily Experiences in Anorexia Nervosa "我不饿"：厌食症患者的身体表征和身体体验

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-024-00735-y

Mara Floris, Matteo Panero

引用次数: 0

In Defense of Introspective Affordances 捍卫自省能力

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-024-00734-z

David Miguel Gray

引用次数: 0

The Informativeness Norm of Assertion 断言的信息规范

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-024-00736-x

Grzegorz Gaszczyk

引用次数: 0

Words and Roots – Polysemy and Allosemy – Communication and Language 词与词根 - 多义词与异义词 - 交流与语言

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-024-00729-w

Robyn Carston

{"title":"Words and Roots – Polysemy and Allosemy – Communication and Language","authors":"Robyn Carston","doi":"10.1007/s13164-024-00729-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-024-00729-w","url":null,"abstract":"Most substantive (content-bearing) words are polysemous, but polysemy is cross-categorial; for instance, the lexical forms ‘stone’ and ‘front’ are associated with families of interrelated senses and these senses are spread across their manifestations as three words, noun, verb and adjective. So, the ultimate unit underpinning polysemy is not a word but the categoryless root of the related words, which must, in some sense, track the interrelated families of senses. The main topic of this paper is the vexed question of the meaning of roots and the backdrop is a view of words as delineated syntactic domains which allow assignment of atomic content (non-compositional meaning), and whose actual meanings are, in the first instance, pragmatically inferred in the throes of communication, some of them subsequently becoming established, so stored in a lexicon and directly retrieved in comprehension. Three different positions on the meanings of roots are outlined, and their merits and shortcomings are discussed: (a) inherent underspecified meanings; (b) meanings conditioned by grammatical context (allosemy); (c) meaninglessness. I argue that, overall, the current state of the evidence favours the third position: roots are categoryless, meaningless (perhaps phonological) indices.","PeriodicalId":47055,"journal":{"name":"Review of Philosophy and Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140798391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Are Biology Experts and Novices Function Pluralists? 生物学专家和新手都是功能多元论者吗？

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-024-00733-0

Andrew J. Roberts, Pierrick Bourrat

{"title":"Are Biology Experts and Novices Function Pluralists?","authors":"Andrew J. Roberts, Pierrick Bourrat","doi":"10.1007/s13164-024-00733-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-024-00733-0","url":null,"abstract":"Philosophers have proposed many accounts of biological function. A coarse-grained distinction can be made between backward-looking views, which emphasise historical contributions to fitness, and forward-looking views, which emphasise the current contribution to fitness or role of a biological component within some larger system. These two views are often framed as being incompatible and conflicting with one another. The emerging field of synthetic biology, which involves applying engineering principles to the design and construction of biological systems, complicates things further by adding intentional design as a source of function. In the current study we explored how biology experts and novices think about function in the context of single-celled, multi-celled, and synthetic organisms. We also explored the extent to which each group were function pluralists, and if they were function pluralists, which accounts of function tended to be endorsed together. The results showed a surprising degree of similarity between experts and novices in most contexts, although certain differences were apparent. Most surprisingly, we found evidence not only of function pluralism in both groups, but pluralism between backward-looking and forward-looking accounts. We discuss these findings in the context of the philosophical debate on function and consider the practical implications for public acceptance of synthetic biology. First, we argue that philosophers of biology should re-examine the purported incompatibility between accounts of function. Second, we argue that due to the introduction of an intentional aetiology in synthetic biology, there may be an inherent conflict between the views of experts and novices when thinking about synthetic biology.","PeriodicalId":47055,"journal":{"name":"Review of Philosophy and Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140624695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Experimenting with Truth 实验真理

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-024-00728-x

Jamin Asay

引用次数: 0

Spatial Indexicals 空间索引

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-024-00731-2

Andreas Stokke

引用次数: 0

Intellectual Humility and Humbling Environments 智力上的谦逊和谦逊的环境

IF 2

Review of Philosophy and Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI: 10.1007/s13164-024-00732-1

Steven Bland

{"title":"Intellectual Humility and Humbling Environments","authors":"Steven Bland","doi":"10.1007/s13164-024-00732-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-024-00732-1","url":null,"abstract":"While there are many competing accounts and scales of intellectual humility, philosophers and psychologists are generally united in treating it as an epistemically beneficial disposition of individual agents. I call the research guided by this supposition the traditional approach to studying intellectual humility. The traditional approach is entirely understandable in light of recent findings that individual differences in intellectual humility are associated with various deleterious epistemic tendencies. Nonetheless, I argue that its near monopoly has resulted in an underestimation of important limitations of human cognition. In particular, it neglects the fact that intellectual arrogance can be both deeply recalcitrant and significantly beneficial for bounded cognitive agents whose reliance on one another is profound. I propose to integrate these insights into the study of intellectual humility by treating it as a collective virtue that gets manifested in the structure of epistemic environments. More specifically, it is an interactive virtue that harnesses and constrains intellectual arrogance to yield benefits for both individuals and collectives. I claim that this can happen only within humbling environments, such as forecasting tournaments and open institutional science.","PeriodicalId":47055,"journal":{"name":"Review of Philosophy and Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140148594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0