{"title":"Trade and Environmental Policies With Special Interest Politics: A Case of Asymmetric Information","authors":"Gaurav Bhattacharya, Meeta Keswani Mehra","doi":"10.1111/jpet.70081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70081","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This paper presents a model on the political economy of trade and environmental policies in the presence of asymmetric information. Information asymmetries stem from the preference of the incumbent government towards welfare of the general voter and political contributions made by special interest groups. Special interest groups are owners of sector-specific factors of production used to produce traded final goods and there exist negative production externalities. The incumbent uses trade and environmental policies to regulate trade flows and environmental quality, respectively. Results show that: (i) information asymmetries work in favour of special interest groups as they guarantee laxer environmental policy in comparison to the baseline scenario of complete information; (ii) trade policy in the domestic country is invariant of the information on the incumbent's preference over aggregate social welfare and reflect terms-of-trade effects and addresses production externalities generated abroad; (iii) including intermediate goods along with final goods in the model creates an additional layer of distortion in the environmental policy through cross-sectoral effects on returns to the sector-specific factors of production. The downward distortion in environmental policy worsens environmental quality, which adversely affects the general voters.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145845825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Environmentally Conscious Fishing Communities and Fishing Quota Negotiations: The Impact of Environmental Externalities","authors":"Elias Asproudis, Eleftherios Filippiadis","doi":"10.1111/jpet.70093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70093","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper uses a Nash bargaining model for analyzing negotiations between a fishing community and a vessel over fishing quotas and wages, for a given Total Allowable Catch imposed by the regulator. The analysis considers the environmental awareness of the community and whether the entire quota allotment is being leased, to examine how environmental externalities, unrelated to fishery sustainability, affect wages, employment, and social welfare. It is argued that if the maximum number of quotas is leased to the vessel, a system of transferable fishing rights is a vehicle for pure transfer payments from the vessel to the community, in the form of higher wages and leased quota revenues. In this context, employment level and social welfare are not affected by the fishing communities' environmental consciousness. However, if less than the maximum number of quotas is leased to the vessel, both wages and revenues from leased quotas are higher, while employment is lower when the community is environmentally conscious compared to when it is not. In such case, social welfare is higher when the community is environmentally conscious provided that the inverse demand for fish does not decline too sharply relative to the rate at which marginal pollution damages increase. Finally, it is shown that the strictness of the <b>Total Allowable Catch</b> regulations impacts both the community's well-being and the vessel's profitability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpet.70093","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145845826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ramsey's Conjecture in Dynamic Contests","authors":"Kerim Keskin, Sıla Pehlivan, Çağrı Sağlam","doi":"10.1111/jpet.70092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70092","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We investigate the extent to which Ramsey's conjecture holds in an infinite-horizon model with two agents in strategic interaction. Our model can also be interpreted as a dynamic contest game with resource constraints and an endogenous winning prize. We show that the most patient agent holds all productive resources in the long run (consistent with Ramsey's conjecture) if he is sufficiently productive. However, under different parameter values, a steady state may arise in which both agents have positive amounts of resources or, surprisingly, in which the least patient agent holds all resources. Our results also shed light on the comparative effects of ability versus patience on the long-run equilibrium behavior in dynamic contests.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145739851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Emission Markets Linkage and Strategic Environmental Policy","authors":"Fabio Antoniou, Panos Hatzipanayotou, Nikos Tsakiris","doi":"10.1111/jpet.70089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70089","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study develops a strategic environmental policy model with linked emission permit markets. We examine whether a cooperative outcome can emerge when exporting countries act non-cooperatively. We endogenize the participation decision through a specific permit revenue-sharing scheme. This allows the cooperative outcome to be sustained as a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. Asymmetries across countries regarding abatement technologies and environmental preferences affect the optimal distribution of the permit revenue. Whenever these asymmetries remain within a certain range, the cooperative outcome in the non-cooperative solution is implementable.</p>","PeriodicalId":47024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpet.70089","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145750912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Monopoly in Bilateral Exchange: Some Historico-Analytical Remarks","authors":"Francesca Busetto, Giulio Codognato, Franco Donzelli, Sayantan Ghosal, Damiano Turchet","doi":"10.1111/jpet.70088","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70088","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, we characterize, under the assumption that the aggregate demand of the atomless part for the commodity held by the monopolist is invertible, the monopoly quantity setting solution proposed by Kats (1974a) as the monopolist's most preferred commodity bundle in the complement of the atomless part's offer curve which is feasible with respect to the aggregate initial endowments. Then, we show that the monopoly solution in bilateral exchange introduced by Busetto et al. (2023) coincides with the monopoly quantity setting solution proposed by Kats (1974a). Finally, we reformulate, the Shitovitz paradox, first exhibited by Busetto et al. (2025), in terms of the Kats monopoly solution. In particular we show that, for any allocation corresponding to a Kats' monopoly solution, there is an allocation in the core, which is, utility-wise, advantageous for the monopolist and nonadvantageous for the small traders, and which is not in the feasible complement of the atomless part's offer curve.</p>","PeriodicalId":47024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpet.70088","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145686373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"International Cross-Ownership, Tariff Simplification, and Welfare Superiority","authors":"Qidi Zhang, Leonard F. S. Wang, Ya-Po Yang","doi":"10.1111/jpet.70086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70086","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study examines the welfare effects of tariff simplification—a shift from a specific to an ad valorem tariff—in an import trade model featuring a domestic and a foreign firm with international cross-ownership. We find that in the absence of cross-shareholdings, tariff simplification increases tariff revenue and domestic social welfare without affecting the domestic firm's profit. However, when cross-shareholdings are present, tariff simplification induces an output-reallocation effect, which shifts some output from the foreign firm to the domestic one, and thus may reduce both firms’ profits, tariff revenue, domestic social welfare, and global welfare. Consequently, an ad valorem tariff can be Pareto-inferior to a specific tariff under international cross-ownership. Extending the model to a reciprocal dumping framework with symmetric linear demands in both countries, we find that with symmetric cross-ownership, tariff simplification harms (benefits) the country with a more (less) efficient domestic firm. Furthermore, when firms have asymmetric production efficiencies, tariff simplification reduces global welfare.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145686372","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Anti-Consumerism: Stick or Carrot?","authors":"Iwan Bos, Giovanni Maccarrone, Marco A. Marini","doi":"10.1111/jpet.70085","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70085","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anti-consumerism is a doctrine that aims to discourage excessive consumption because of its damaging effect on the environment. It can either focus on creating psychic costs for consumers (a ‘stick’) or psychic benefits for non-consumers (a ‘carrot’). This paper examines the impact of these two approaches on competition and welfare. The competitive effect is comparable in both cases—anti-consumerism reduces competitive pressure as well as prices, outputs and profits. In terms of consumer and social welfare, however, the carrot performs strictly better than the stick.</p>","PeriodicalId":47024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpet.70085","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145686159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Delegated Networking","authors":"Jing Fu, Frank Page","doi":"10.1111/jpet.70087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70087","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We construct a model of a principal-agent game of network formation (over layered networks) with asymmetric information and consider the following two questions: (1) Is it possible for the principal to design a mechanism that links the reports of agents' private information and the set of connections allowed and recommended by the principal via the mechanism in such a way that players truthfully reveal their private information to the principal and follow the recommendations specified by the mechanism. (2) An even more fundamental question we address is whether or not it is possible for the principal to achieve the same outcome (as that achieved via a mechanism and centralized reporting) by instead choosing a profile of sets of allowable ways an agent (a player) can connect to a club (here modeled as player-club pair specific sets—or catalogs—of arc types) and then delegating connection choice to the player. We call this approach to network formation with incomplete information delegated networking and we show, under relatively mild conditions on our game-theoretic model, that strategic network formation with incomplete information, implemented via a mechanism and centralized reporting, is equivalent to implementation via arc catalogs and delegated networking with monitoring. Because the principal's problem over connection catalogs can be shown to have a solution, our equivalence result allows us to show that the principal's much more difficult problem over incentive compatible network formation mechanisms has a solution.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145686158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Robust Collective Agreements: A Theory of Cooperation Under Heterogeneity and Limited Enforcement","authors":"Gustavo Nicolas Paez Salamanca","doi":"10.1111/jpet.70084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70084","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This paper develops a unified theoretical framework to explain why informal collective agreements frequently persist even when they deviate from welfare-maximizing rules. It addresses four empirical puzzles of cooperation, commitment without enforcement, persistence of inefficient rules, the ambiguous role of inequality, and the coexistence of unequal treatment with equalizing outcomes, by introducing the concept of <i>robustness</i>: the ability of a rule to sustain cooperation under the weakest incentive conditions. Within a common stochastic repeated-game setting, two archetypal forms of collective agreements are examined: <i>club good agreements</i>, with unequal contributions and equal benefits, and <i>common pool agreements</i>, with equal contributions and unequal benefits. Robust agreements are shown to exist broadly and to differ systematically across these institutional forms, yet in both cases, they minimize incentives to deviate while compressing disparities in expected utility. The analysis reconciles diverse empirical regularities, such as partial pooling, persistent inequality, and stability of informal arrangements, by shifting the focus from efficiency to robustness as the key organizing principle of sustainable cooperation under heterogeneity.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145695514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Selective Contracting in Heath Care: Is There an Optimal Network Size?","authors":"Michel Mougeot, Florence Naegelen","doi":"10.1111/jpet.70083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.70083","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In many countries, insurers build preferred provider networks to reduce costs. In this paper, we address the issue of the optimal size of such networks. Considering the case of medical services whose price is not regulated, we assume that the insurer sets a number <span></span><math>\u0000 <semantics>\u0000 <mrow>\u0000 <mi>m</mi>\u0000 </mrow>\u0000 <annotation> $m$</annotation>\u0000 </semantics></math> of in-network providers and organizes price competition to select the preferred providers among <span></span><math>\u0000 <semantics>\u0000 <mrow>\u0000 <mi>n</mi>\u0000 </mrow>\u0000 <annotation> $n$</annotation>\u0000 </semantics></math> suppliers. Policyholders benefit from a higher reimbursement when they choose an in-network provider. We show that both in-network and off-network prices decrease with the number of in-network providers, that the largest possible network is optimal for the representative policyholder and for a not-for-profit insurer while a network with only one provider is preferred by a for-profit insurer.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145626112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}