Journal of Social Philosophy最新文献

{"title":"Dilemmas of dating: The case of aprioristic sexual lookism","authors":"Rossella De Bernardi","doi":"10.1111/josp.12585","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12585","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Philosophy","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141773246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reparative justice, historical injustice, and the nonidentity problem","authors":"Felix Lambrecht","doi":"10.1111/josp.12583","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12583","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Philosophy","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141745446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The mirage of a “paradox” of dehumanization: How to affirm the reality of dehumanization","authors":"Maria Kronfeldner","doi":"10.1111/josp.12566","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12566","url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that the so‐called ‘paradox’ of dehumanization is a mirage arising from misplaced abstraction. The alleged ‘paradox’ is taken as a challenge that arises from a skeptical stance. After reviewing the history of that skeptical stance, it is reconstructed as an argument with two premises. With the help of an epistemologically structured but pluralistic frame it is then shown how the two premises of the Skeptic's argument can both be debunked. As part of that it emerges that there are a couple of ways how dehumanization can be realized, and one such realization can be sufficient for affirming the reality of dehumanization for a specific case.","PeriodicalId":46756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Philosophy","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141569788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A troubled inheritance: Overcoming the temporality problem in cases of historical injustice","authors":"Renaud‐Philippe Garner, Marion Godman","doi":"10.1111/josp.12582","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12582","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Philosophy","volume":"143 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141569790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"What we owe to impaired agents","authors":"Giacomo Floris","doi":"10.1111/josp.12581","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12581","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Philosophy","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141569789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Non-ideal theory and critical theory and their relationship to standpoint theory","authors":"Hilkje C. Hänel","doi":"10.1111/josp.12580","DOIUrl":"10.1111/josp.12580","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper brings together two distinct areas of philosophy that have so far not received much attention together: Critical Theory and non-ideal theory. Its main argument is that these two yet distinct areas of philosophy share a methodological stance when it comes to analyzing social reality, namely standpoint theory. While there is a well-acknowledged relation between Critical Theory and standpoint theory, the claim that non-ideal theory is committed to standpoint theory as a methodology deserves further explanation. In a co-authored paper, Johanna Müller and I (<span>2022</span>) argue for a descriptive claim, they urge non-ideal theorists to engage in an act of self-clarification about the way in which they are doing non-ideal theory and argue that the commitment to start from real world injustices always already entails a commitment to standpoint theory. According to this claim, any theorist is embedded in a given ideology and, thus, needs methodological tools to overcome the ideological arrogance that might prevent them from analyzing particular instances of injustice.<sup>1</sup></p><p>Here, I want to make an explicitly normative claim, namely that taking seriously the pervasiveness of ideology and the resulting challenge of false consciousness, means that any endeavor in non-ideal theory that is not committed to standpoint theory is fruitless. This claim is not just about self-clarification. Instead, it proposes a way in which non-ideal theory <i>should</i> proceed.<sup>2</sup> To do so, I am guided by three claims: First, if non-ideal theory is theory that is non-idealizing (as Hänel & Müller, <span>2022</span>; Khader, <span>forthcoming</span>; and Mills, <span>2005</span> show), then ideology is a barrier to such theorizing. Second, critical standpoints (as advanced by versions of standpoint theory) can function as a tool to overcome such barriers, yet, critical standpoints have to be achieved or struggled for and are not necessarily given due to a person's social group memberships or social identities. And, third, being subject to (intersecting) oppressions can be an epistemic advantage insofar as it provides the moral ruptures or internal contradictions needed to achieve a critical standpoint. It should be noted that the paper's aim is rather modest insofar as none of its claims are original in themselves, rather I am relying on the toolbox of Critical Theorists, standpoint theorists, and non-ideal theorists. What is new is (a) the way in which I let these traditions talk to each other and (b) my focus on the “trap of ideology”; neither do non-ideal theorists concern themselves with this particular dimension of ideology as an obstacle for theorizing, nor do contemporary standpoint epistemologists pay much attention to this problem.</p><p>In recent years, feminist philosophers and other moral and political philosophers have been increasingly disappointed with the dominant Rawlsian paradigm of doing normative theory in which the","PeriodicalId":46756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Philosophy","volume":"56 1","pages":"24-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josp.12580","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141548856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Issue Information - NASSP Page","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/josp.12530","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12530","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Philosophy","volume":"55 2","pages":"164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josp.12530","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141424944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/josp.12528","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12528","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Philosophy","volume":"55 2","pages":"165-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141424945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Editor's introduction: Special issue—Rawls at 100; Theory at 50","authors":"David Reidy","doi":"10.1111/josp.12565","DOIUrl":"10.1111/josp.12565","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Philosophy","volume":"55 2","pages":"167-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141060459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Lottocracy and class‐specific political institutions: A plebeian constitutionalist defense","authors":"Vincent Harting","doi":"10.1111/josp.12564","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12564","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Philosophy","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140841766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}