{"title":"Pathways to Substate Variation in the UK's Employment Relations: The Case of the Welsh Government","authors":"Leon Gooberman, Marco Hauptmeier","doi":"10.1111/irj.70003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70003","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The UK is often viewed as a centralised entity that has pursued neoliberal policies. Yet its political system features devolved parliaments whose governments deploy responsibilities including those linked to employment relations. This article explores the Welsh Government's role within employment relations to argue that it has shaped pathways to substate variation by (1) defining the procedural status of other actors through creating social partnership structures (2) deploying its role as employer, funder, and procurer to influence employer behaviour, and (3) making some statutory regulation. We conclude that the Welsh Government is part of an increasingly fragmented regulatory state within the UK that offers some opportunities for subnational actors to create divergences within its national system of employment relations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46619,"journal":{"name":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL","volume":"56 5","pages":"411-418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irj.70003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144929925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Concise Introduction to Employment Relations By Richard Hyman, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2025. 148 pp. £21.56. ISBN: 978-1-80-220749-1","authors":"Manuela Galetto","doi":"10.1111/irj.70001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.70001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46619,"journal":{"name":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL","volume":"56 5","pages":"419-421"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144930021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to “Did COVID-19 Level the Playing Field or Entrench It? Comparing Patterns of Homeworking by Ethnicity, Gender and Migration Status, Before, During and After COVID-19 in the UK”","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/irj.12475","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12475","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chung, H., and S. Yuan. 2025. “Did COVID-19 Level the Playing Field or Entrench It? Comparing Patterns of Homeworking by Ethnicity, Gender and Migration Status, Before, During and After COVID-19 in the UK.” <i>Industrial Relations Journal</i> 56: 236–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12462</p><p>The funding information was incorrect in the previous version. It was written as ‘This project received funding from the Trade Union Congress project on “Black and Minority ethnic workers” experience of home and hybrid working’ and the Productivity Institute funded project “Hybrid Working And Productivity: Exploring Flexibility Stigma And Racial Inequalities”.</p><p>This should be changed to ‘<b>This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council [grant number: ES/V002740/1]—for</b> the Productivity Institute funded project “Hybrid Working And Productivity” and from the Trade Union Congress project on “Black and Minority ethnic workers” experience of home and hybrid working’.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":46619,"journal":{"name":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irj.12475","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144574256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Trade Unions, the Right to Strike and the Political Economy of Labour: The Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1974","authors":"Paul Smith","doi":"10.1111/irj.12473","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12473","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The law of trade unions and industrial action remains a focus of debate and conflict between contrasting norms and values as to how the economy and society function or how they should do so. This is articulated in a conflict between the political economy of capital and the political economy of labour. This paper explores this theme in an analysis of the struggle to create a right to strike against the legacy of the Combination Acts and the vitality of the common law. This culminated in the Trade Disputes Act (TDA) 1906, which, after the failure of the Industrial Relations Act 1971, was restated in wider language by the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act 1974 (as amended in 1976). Judicial opposition to this Act helped to pave the way for the legislation enacted after 1979 by a Conservative government committed to restricting and regulating the right to strike and union government.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":46619,"journal":{"name":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL","volume":"56 5","pages":"397-410"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144930015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Sea Change in UK Strike Statistics, Implications for Public Policy, and Misrepresentation of the 2022–2023 Strike Surge","authors":"Dave Lyddon","doi":"10.1111/irj.12474","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12474","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The UK state has collected data on strike activity for over a century, to inform public policy on industrial relations. This involved creating and maintaining a consistent and reliable data set, despite inevitable limitations and funding pressures. Yet how the Office for National Statistics now constructs and presents its statistics on strikes, collected through the Labour Disputes Inquiry, has been radically transformed. Two revisions to the definition of a ‘stoppage’, departing from International Labour Organisation resolutions, have broken the consistency of this longstanding series. The most egregious is that a multi-employer strike (such as in health or education), or a multi-union strike, no longer constitutes just one but multiple stoppages (of each employer and of each union), resulting in an ‘explosion’ of recorded stoppage numbers. Weaknesses in data collection and presentation compound these difficulties. Not only are the dimensions of the 2022–2023 strike surge misrepresented, but the historic role of strike statistics in informing public policy is now undermined. Recommendations are made on how to improve the ONS's published strike data.</p>","PeriodicalId":46619,"journal":{"name":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL","volume":"56 5","pages":"382-396"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irj.12474","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144929839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Desmond Tutu Ayentimi, Albert Amankwaa, John Burgess
{"title":"A Decade of Industrial Relations Research in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda","authors":"Desmond Tutu Ayentimi, Albert Amankwaa, John Burgess","doi":"10.1111/irj.12472","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12472","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This review paper examines the state of IR research in SSA and establishes a future research agenda—a context that has had limited coverage in global IR literature. Following the Preferred Reporting Items method for conducting Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses, we reviewed 52 IR studies published in 43 journals between 2013 and 2023 that covered 16 countries in SSA. Analysis of the studies revealed five core areas of IR research: union militancy, new form of union activism and democratisation, union fragmentation, tripartism and externally driven neoliberalism. Further analysis identified four emerging themes: colonial and historical legacies, overrepresentation of the South African context, and theoretical and methodological challenges linked to researching IR in the region. Despite regional variations between Francophone, Lusophone and Anglophone Africa, our review contends that regardless of the country-specific orientation and history, IR in SSA is entangled with colonisation, decolonisation, institutional democratisation, economic informality and precarious labour politics. These findings have significant implications for IR research and policy, particularly on the advancement of decent work and regeneration of trade unions in SSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":46619,"journal":{"name":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL","volume":"56 5","pages":"363-381"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irj.12472","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144929643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Serf-ing the Net: Contrasting Uber Workers in the United Kingdom With Uber Neo-Villeins in Ontario","authors":"Geraint Harvey, Naveena Prakasam, Refat Shakirzhanov","doi":"10.1111/irj.12471","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12471","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We illustrate the exploitation in the relationship between Uber and its drivers by aligning their work with the characteristics of neo-villeiny. Two different legal developments in response to irregulation (or the lack of effective regulation) in similar institutional contexts emerge. While Uber drivers in the United Kingdom now have worker status, dysregulation (by which we mean regulation that exacerbates the problem it seeks to resolve) in Ontario has established neo-villeiny in law.</p>","PeriodicalId":46619,"journal":{"name":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL","volume":"56 5","pages":"353-362"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irj.12471","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144929644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"German Trade Unions and Decarbonisation: A Transition to Green Growth, A-Growth or Degrowth?","authors":"Vera Trappmann, Dennis Eversberg, Felix Schulz","doi":"10.1111/irj.12467","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12467","url":null,"abstract":"<p>While the need for a transformation to tackle climate change is no longer contested, competing visions about the future have taken the front seat in political debates. Previous research on stakeholders in the European Parliament and the German Bundestag identified opposing views relating to green growth, degrowth and post-growth. In relation to trade unions, these have recently been discussed conceptually to some extent, but empirical work on the topic has hitherto been absent. Drawing on 25 semi-structured interviews with representatives of Germany's DGB trade unions, we find that, despite their strong support for a green growth narrative and official opposition to post-growth thought, the majority of interviewees sketched out concrete visions for a just future that in some respects aligns with post- or a-growth positions. In line with post-growth discourses, trade union officials described an economy that allows for ‘a good life’ and ‘good work’, based on principles of co-determination, secure and well-paid jobs ensured by collective bargaining, income, wealth and inheritance tax reform and a stronger, more active role of the state. Findings suggest that despite German labour unions’ shared opposition to the term post-growth or degrowth, there is significant overlap in terms of concrete goals and policy proposals.</p>","PeriodicalId":46619,"journal":{"name":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL","volume":"56 4","pages":"322-333"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irj.12467","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144573899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"‘I Can Just Do Work I'm Paid to Do’: Hybrid Work and Tertiary Labour Time Gains","authors":"Lila Skountridaki, Oliver Mallett","doi":"10.1111/irj.12469","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12469","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper adopts a moral economy framework to analyse the unique and collective experience of remote work during the UK pandemic lockdowns. Through analysis of qualitative interviews with workers based at home during periods of lockdown, we explore how this offered workers a new opportunity to evaluate a particular type of work extensification experienced when working onsite. We found that workers gained clarity over ‘preparing-for-work’, commuting and other unpaid labour as unfairly burdening nonwork time and social goods like family, health and leisure. We expand on the idea of tertiary time to suggest that hybrid work, despite its potential drawbacks, is viewed by workers as a way to regain some control over this area of their lives. By examining this in terms of the concept of lay normativity, our analysis draws out the importance of personal needs and emotional connections. We identify how, during the pandemic's extreme circumstances, a new opportunity for evaluation emerged that facilitated the development of a new sentiment around tertiary time devoted to the commute and preparation for work.</p>","PeriodicalId":46619,"journal":{"name":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL","volume":"56 5","pages":"339-352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irj.12469","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144929739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Right-to-Work Laws and Firm Productivity in U.S. Firms","authors":"Mohamed Shaker Ahmed, Charilaos Mertzanis","doi":"10.1111/irj.12468","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12468","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We investigate the impact of Right-to-Work (RTW) laws on firm-level total factor productivity (TFP) in U.S. firms. We find that RTW laws, which reduce union bargaining power, are associated with a decrease in firm-level TFP, particularly for firms adopting innovation-driven strategies or facing financial constraints. These effects are robust across various models and endogeneity treatments, emphasising the importance of internal and external factors in assessing labour policy impacts. Weakening labour protection and limiting union influence may reduce worker engagement, weaken bargaining power, and ultimately hinder productivity. The study contributes to the literature by empirically linking RTW adoption with TFP and expanding the discussion on labour market policies as determinants of productivity. It also highlights the roles of business strategy, market dynamism, and financial constraints in mitigating the corporate effects of RTW laws. The research provides insights for policymakers and business leaders, emphasising the need for balanced labour market policies that support both corporate flexibility and worker engagement to sustain productivity.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":46619,"journal":{"name":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL","volume":"56 4","pages":"301-321"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144574172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}