Did COVID-19 Level the Playing Field or Entrench It? Comparing Patterns of Homeworking by Ethnicity, Gender and Migration Status, Before, During and After COVID-19 in the UK

IF 1.6 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Heejung Chung, Shiyu Yuan
{"title":"Did COVID-19 Level the Playing Field or Entrench It? Comparing Patterns of Homeworking by Ethnicity, Gender and Migration Status, Before, During and After COVID-19 in the UK","authors":"Heejung Chung,&nbsp;Shiyu Yuan","doi":"10.1111/irj.12462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines how the pandemic changed the ethnicity gaps in working-from-home practices in the UK. We do this by examining seven waves of the UK Labour Force Survey from 2017 to 2023, divided into three time periods—pre-pandemic, during-lockdown and post-lockdown. The results show that although the gap found between White and BME workers in the pre-pandemic period disappears as we move into the post-lockdown period, there are large differences between different ethnicities, especially when we intersect ethnicity with migration status, gender, and parental status. Even in the post-lockdown period of 2022–2023, Black men, particularly Black fathers, stood out for their low levels of homeworking, alongside Chinese and ‘Other Asian’ workers - both men and women. On closer inspection, we found that it was especially migrant workers from these ethnicities who were significantly worse off in terms of their access to homeworking. The paper shows that although we see a positive change in homeworking, which has increased for most ethnic groups over the course of the pandemic, certain groups are still left behind in this growth. The paper further highlights the need for an intersectional analysis when examining such labour market patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":46619,"journal":{"name":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL","volume":"56 3","pages":"236-250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/irj.12462","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/irj.12462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how the pandemic changed the ethnicity gaps in working-from-home practices in the UK. We do this by examining seven waves of the UK Labour Force Survey from 2017 to 2023, divided into three time periods—pre-pandemic, during-lockdown and post-lockdown. The results show that although the gap found between White and BME workers in the pre-pandemic period disappears as we move into the post-lockdown period, there are large differences between different ethnicities, especially when we intersect ethnicity with migration status, gender, and parental status. Even in the post-lockdown period of 2022–2023, Black men, particularly Black fathers, stood out for their low levels of homeworking, alongside Chinese and ‘Other Asian’ workers - both men and women. On closer inspection, we found that it was especially migrant workers from these ethnicities who were significantly worse off in terms of their access to homeworking. The paper shows that although we see a positive change in homeworking, which has increased for most ethnic groups over the course of the pandemic, certain groups are still left behind in this growth. The paper further highlights the need for an intersectional analysis when examining such labour market patterns.

Abstract Image

COVID-19是公平竞争还是巩固竞争环境?比较英国在COVID-19之前、期间和之后按种族、性别和移民身份划分的在家工作模式
本研究考察了疫情如何改变英国在家工作的种族差异。为此,我们研究了2017年至2023年英国劳动力调查的七次浪潮,分为大流行前、封锁期间和封锁后三个时期。结果表明,虽然在大流行前白人和BME工人之间发现的差距随着我们进入封锁后的时期而消失,但不同种族之间存在很大差异,特别是当我们将种族与移民身份、性别和父母身份联系起来时。即使在2022年至2023年的封锁后时期,黑人男性,尤其是黑人父亲,与中国和“其他亚洲”工人(包括男性和女性)一样,在家工作的比例也很低。经过更仔细的观察,我们发现,尤其是来自这些种族的农民工,在获得在家办公的机会方面,情况明显更糟。该论文表明,尽管我们看到了家庭作业的积极变化,在大流行期间,大多数族裔群体的家庭作业有所增加,但某些群体在这一增长中仍被抛在后面。本文进一步强调了在检查此类劳动力市场模式时需要进行交叉分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信