Settler Colonial Studies最新文献_第10页

Appropriating Indigenous lands: the liberal founding of Manitoba 占用土著土地:马尼托巴省的自由主义建立

IF 0.9

Settler Colonial Studies Pub Date : 2020-11-30 DOI: 10.1080/2201473x.2020.1853947

Éléna Choquette

{"title":"Appropriating Indigenous lands: the liberal founding of Manitoba","authors":"Éléna Choquette","doi":"10.1080/2201473x.2020.1853947","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473x.2020.1853947","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the language and strategies of Canadian land expansion through the founding of Manitoba in 1870. It analyses the discourse of key colonial authorities, which reveal that Canada mobilises the ideals of liberalism to promote the colonial policy of appropriating Indigenous lands. Because liberalism endures as the dominant paradigm that both structure contemporary politics and contemporary thinking about politics in the West, it is critical to clarify the connection between liberalism and the wrongs of land appropriation. Examining the role of liberal ideas in the founding of Manitoba also helps defuse the capacity of liberalism to produce dispossession, especially of Indigenous Peoples. In addition to exposing the ideas that supported the production of Canadian sovereignty, this article also analyses the various tactics Canada deployed to secure that sovereignty amidst Indigenous resistance. If Canadian officials first opted to absorb Indigenous lands through the ‘gentle’ means of administration, declaration and negotiation, they resorted to military forces when Indigenous Peoples frustrated Canadian claims to sovereignty. By bringing into focus the shifting tactics that Canadian state officials employed to annex Indigenous lands, the founding of Manitoba enriches our understanding of settler colonial statecraft and of the distinctive means of settler state expansion.","PeriodicalId":46232,"journal":{"name":"Settler Colonial Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89874413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Four foundations of settler colonial theory: four insights from Argentina 移民殖民理论的四个基础:来自阿根廷的四个见解

IF 0.9

Settler Colonial Studies Pub Date : 2020-11-17 DOI: 10.1080/2201473X.2020.1845939

Lucy Taylor

引用次数: 6

Settler silencing and the killing of Colten Boushie: naturalizing colonialism in the trial of Gerald Stanley 定居者的沉默和对科尔顿·布希的杀害:杰拉尔德·斯坦利审判中的归化殖民主义

IF 0.9

Settler Colonial Studies Pub Date : 2020-11-11 DOI: 10.1080/2201473x.2020.1841505

David B. MacDonald

{"title":"Settler silencing and the killing of Colten Boushie: naturalizing colonialism in the trial of Gerald Stanley","authors":"David B. MacDonald","doi":"10.1080/2201473x.2020.1841505","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473x.2020.1841505","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A particularly egregious example of settler injustice was the murder of a young nehiyaw man named Colten Boushie in August, 2016, shot in the head by a white farmer named Gerald Stanley. An all-white jury in Saskatchewan acquitted Stanley in February 2018, touching off demonstrations across the country. This article contextualizes the Stanley trial within settler colonial history, and argues that the trial and its aftermath provide a window into the ways settler colonialism tries to silence Indigenous peoples. Divided into four parts, the article first explores the concept of settler silencing, while the second looks at the context of settler colonialism in with a focus on Treaty 6 lands in Saskatchewan, and how the Treaty has been silenced for over a century. I then move to a detailed engagement with the killing of Colten Boushie and the trial which followed. I draw liberally on the trial transcript, demonstrating various techniques used to silence Indigenous peoples while confining speech and the articulation of what constitutes the norm to a handful of non-Indigenous legal professionals. I focus here on multiple examples of how settler silencing works in practice, before in the final part make several conclusions.","PeriodicalId":46232,"journal":{"name":"Settler Colonial Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2020-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82401299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Unsettling the boundaries of Latin America: Rapa Nui and the refusal of Chilean settler colonialism 扰乱拉丁美洲的边界:拉帕努伊和智利殖民者殖民主义的拒绝

IF 0.9

Settler Colonial Studies Pub Date : 2020-10-06 DOI: 10.1080/2201473X.2020.1823751

F. Young

{"title":"Unsettling the boundaries of Latin America: Rapa Nui and the refusal of Chilean settler colonialism","authors":"F. Young","doi":"10.1080/2201473X.2020.1823751","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2020.1823751","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Latin America is popularly imagined territorialized by continental Central and South America, extending to the Caribbean Islands; however, from the vantage of the Chilean government, Latin America expands thousands of miles into the Pacific Ocean within an area it legalizes as ‘the Chilean Sea’ (El Mar Chileno) given its control of ‘Easter Island’ (Isla de Pascua). Since 1888, despite persistent resistance by the Indigenous Polynesian Rapa Nui people, Chile has imposed colonial rule on the island through a variety of administrative strategies. This paper illuminates how state construction of a Marine Protected Area (MPA) around Rapa Nui can be understood as a biopolitical strategy of environmentality that strengthens Chilean settler colonialism in Rapa Nui. While settler colonialism has been rightly analyzed in terms of control of land, herein the ‘transit of Empire’ from Indigenous loci of enunciation appears to also articulate through the ocean. Despite the MPA, forces of Rapa Nui biopower mobilizing new Indigenous institutions and practices of self-determination are shown resilient in El Mar Chileno; the boundaries of settler colonial Latin America are unsettled.","PeriodicalId":46232,"journal":{"name":"Settler Colonial Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2020-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76516820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Dispossession and legal mentalité in nineteenth-century South Africa: Grotian and Lockean theories of property acquisition in the annexations of British Kaffraria and Natalia 19世纪南非的剥夺和法律心理:格罗提安和洛克关于英国吞并南非和纳塔利亚时财产获取的理论

IF 0.9

Settler Colonial Studies Pub Date : 2020-10-06 DOI: 10.1080/2201473x.2020.1829423

Darren R. Reid

引用次数: 1

Settler colonialism and/in (urban) Brazil: black and indigenous resistances to the logic of elimination 移民殖民主义和/在(城市)巴西:黑人和土著对消除逻辑的抵抗

IF 0.9

Settler Colonial Studies Pub Date : 2020-10-06 DOI: 10.1080/2201473X.2020.1823750

Desirée Poets

{"title":"Settler colonialism and/in (urban) Brazil: black and indigenous resistances to the logic of elimination","authors":"Desirée Poets","doi":"10.1080/2201473X.2020.1823750","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2020.1823750","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT How does elimination work in Brazil? After a brief history of miscegenation as assimilation/elimination, this article addresses this question through the experiences of one urban indigenous group (Aldeia Maracanã) and one urban Afro-descendant quilombo (Sacopã) in Rio de Janeiro. Based on fieldwork conducted between 2014 and 2017, the article traces the continuities of settler colonialism in independent Brazil, including the multicultural turn of the 1988 Constitution. I centre the lived experiences and struggles of the two groups, whose intersecting politics are caught within the inescapability of being ‘within Empire’ while having to imagine a politics outside of it (Simpson 2014). I then contribute to Settler Colonial Theory from this perspective, challenging its land-labour binary, for Black and Indigenous peoples have both been affected by processes of elimination, dispossession, labour exploitation, and exclusion (racism). Moreover, miscegenation/assimilation has not been merely ‘a kind of death’, as Patrick Wolfe has portrayed it (Wolfe, 2006). Miscegenation has also functioned as the space from which indigenous and black peoples have resurged, survived, and thrived. When we engage critically with the political options available to these groups within settler colonialism, we are forced to ask: What does it mean to talk about de-colonisation in Brazil?","PeriodicalId":46232,"journal":{"name":"Settler Colonial Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2020-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73217553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Endless dispossession: the Charrua re-emergence in Uruguay in the light of settler colonialism 无休止的剥夺:在殖民者殖民主义的光照下，查鲁亚人在乌拉圭重新出现

IF 0.9

Settler Colonial Studies Pub Date : 2020-10-06 DOI: 10.1080/2201473X.2020.1823752

Gustavo Verdesio

{"title":"Endless dispossession: the Charrua re-emergence in Uruguay in the light of settler colonialism","authors":"Gustavo Verdesio","doi":"10.1080/2201473X.2020.1823752","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2020.1823752","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In a country like Uruguay, that imagines itself as a ‘country without Indians’, the emergence of groups of activists who claim to be of indigenous descent has provoked a series of reactions that cover a wide spectrum that goes from mockery to wrath. The State and some of the most revered anthropologists (like Daniel Vidart and Renzo Pi Hugarte), as well as the general public, are reluctant to recognize their legitimacy. This has serious legal consequences in that country, which does not count with a specific legal framework to deal with indigenous matters due to the fact that Uruguay has not ratified the ILO Convention number 169, which is the most important international piece of indigenous legislation that has binding power for the ratifying nations. In this paper, I will discuss the pertinence of settler colonial studies for the understanding of some historical processes in the Southern Cone. I will also try to shed some light on the Uruguayan case through an analysis of the importance of the Marxian notion of primitive accumulation, which explains the process of dispossession suffered by the diverse indigenous groups that populated the land before the arrival of European settlers. Hopefully, this will shed some light on the sometimes angry and violent reactions of Uruguayan mainstream society to the reemergence of indigenous collectives in a country where they were thought to be extinct: their reappearance puts into question the legitimate possession of the land by the Uruguayan State and its inhabitants.","PeriodicalId":46232,"journal":{"name":"Settler Colonial Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2020-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73281924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Janus-faced mobility, sense of road-as-place and Indigenous Bedouin-Jewish settlers relationships 双面人的流动性，道路作为地方的感觉以及土著贝都因人与犹太定居者的关系

IF 0.9

Settler Colonial Studies Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI: 10.1080/2201473x.2020.1829369

A. Meir, B. Roded, Arnon Ben-Israel

引用次数: 1

The red tape of reparations: settler governmentalities of truth telling and compensation for Indian residential schools 赔偿的繁文缛节:殖民者政府的真相和对印第安寄宿学校的赔偿

IF 0.9

Settler Colonial Studies Pub Date : 2020-09-06 DOI: 10.1080/2201473x.2020.1811591

Jennifer Matsunaga

{"title":"The red tape of reparations: settler governmentalities of truth telling and compensation for Indian residential schools","authors":"Jennifer Matsunaga","doi":"10.1080/2201473x.2020.1811591","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473x.2020.1811591","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper brings into conversation truth telling and compensation as forms of reparation for historical injustices in the Canadian settler colonial context. I examine how settler bureaucracy engages with stories of Indian residential schools and former students through analysis of the Common Experience Payment program’s application form and final evaluation. This program, which provided former students with compensation for their collective experience in residential schools, erases survivor-centred forms of truth telling within the records and practices of the public service. I argue that the Common Experience Payment process both produces a new Indigenous population to be governed and perpetuates longstanding settler colonial rationalities that attempt to manage and marginalize the emotion and voices of Indigenous peoples and racialize them as inferior by way of being a ‘challenge to overcome’ for the bureaucracy. I emphasize that assimilation is not located simply in the spectacular or brute acts embedded in settler colonial policy, but in the everyday procedural instruments and mechanisms of the public service such as application forms and final evaluations which are largely taken for granted as benign.","PeriodicalId":46232,"journal":{"name":"Settler Colonial Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2020-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75528962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The end(s) of regeneration: naturalist frontier chronotopes and the time of US settler colonial biopolitics 再生的终结:自然主义的边疆时代与美国移民殖民生物政治的时代

IF 0.9

Settler Colonial Studies Pub Date : 2020-08-21 DOI: 10.1080/2201473x.2020.1809939

Ryan Wander

{"title":"The end(s) of regeneration: naturalist frontier chronotopes and the time of US settler colonial biopolitics","authors":"Ryan Wander","doi":"10.1080/2201473x.2020.1809939","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473x.2020.1809939","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article reads naturalist portrayals of “post-frontier” frontiers by Frank Norris and Jack London, two key turn-of-the-twentieth-century US literary naturalists, for their chronotopic engagement with the temporal logics and phenomenological orientations that underwrite US settler colonialism. Despite its 1890 “closure,” the concept of the frontier remained central to the ongoing enactment of US settler colonialism around the turn of the twentieth century, and it remains so to this day. This article argues that Norris and London's naturalist aesthetics support the US settler state's biopolitics of white ascendance, racialized death, and Native elimination through narratives of white settler death. By considering texts whose narratives appear to contradict the white masculine triumphalism that literary critics often stress in readings of naturalist frontier fiction, I trace how texts including McTeague (1899), The Call of the Wild (1903), and “To Build a Fire” (1908) mobilize US literary naturalism's evolutionary and typological representational idiom to stage critiques of the racial and genocidal logics of US settler colonialism. Ultimately, these critiques uniquely help to consolidate the phenomenological orientations that underwrite US settler biopolitics: Norris and London's narratives of white settler death turn the representation of white settler death into a source of (white) settler futurity.","PeriodicalId":46232,"journal":{"name":"Settler Colonial Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2020-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86563826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0